Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:56:23.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planktonic Oceanic Ostracods—Historical, Present and Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

M. V. Angel
M. V. Angel
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey
Get access

Synopsis

Brady's (1880) Challenger report mentioned only three species of planktonic ostracods, all halocyprids. At that time only 10 halocyprid species were known and only 14 papers had been written on the group. The major burst of interest came in the twenty years 1890–1909, when first Claus and then G. W. Müller published series of papers describing the majority of the present species. Table 1 shows the wax and wane in the numbers of papers published and the species described by decades since 1849 when Dana described the first species. The table clearly shows the recent upsurge of interest in the group. Many of the papers include only passing mention of planktonic ostracods, and so this review attempts to assemble all these scattered references so that the ecological importance of the group can be appreciated and further research requirements become clearer

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 73: Challenger Expedition Centenary Proceedings 2 , 1972 , pp. 213 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Angel, M. V., 1968 a. Sarsia, 34, 299–312.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1968 b. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 48, 255–257.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1968 c. Sarsia, 33, 1–6.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1969 a. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 49, 515–553.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V. 1969 b J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 3, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1969 c. Crustaceana, 17, 35–44.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1969 d. Crustaceana, 17, 45–63.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1970 a. Crustaceana, 18, 147–166.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1970 b. J.Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 50, 731–736.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1970 c. Crustaceana, 19, 181–199.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1971 a. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 21, 257–283.Google Scholar
Angel, M. V., 1971 b. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 21, 289–296.Google Scholar
Badcock, J., 1970. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 50, 1001–1044.Google Scholar
Baker, A. de C, 1970. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 50, 301–342.Google Scholar
Barney, R. W., 1921. Nat. Hist. Rep. Br. Antarct. Terra Nova Exped., 3, 175–190.Google Scholar
Blumer, M., Mullin, M. M. and Thomas, D. W., 1964. Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters., 10, 187–201.Google Scholar
Brady, G. S., 1880. Rep. Scient. Res. Voy. H.M.S. Challenger, Zool, 1, 1–179.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1940. Scient. Rep. John Murray Exped., 6, 319–325.Google Scholar
Cassanova, J.-P., 1970. Revue Trav. Inst. (Scient. Tech.) Pech. Marit., 31, 45–58.Google Scholar
Claus, C, 1891. Die Halocyprididen des Atlantischen Oceans und Mittelmeeres. Wien: Holder.Google Scholar
Glaus, C, 1894. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss., Wien, Math-Nat. Kl, 61, 1–10.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D., 1849. Conspectus Crustaceorum quae in Orbis Terrarum circumnavigatione, Carolo Wilkes e Classe Reipublicae Foederatae Duce, lexit et descripsit J. D. Dana. Pars II. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 2, 9.Google Scholar
Davidson, V. M., 1925. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish., 2, 297–306.Google Scholar
Deevey, Georgiana B., 1968 a. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., 26, 1–125Google Scholar
Deevey, Georgiana B., 1968 b. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 81, 539–570.Google Scholar
Deevey, Georgiana B., 1970. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 82, 799–824.Google Scholar
Deevey, Georgiana B., 1971. Limnol. Oceanogr., 16, 219–240.Google Scholar
Eagar, S. H., 1970. J. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 1, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erhardt, J.-P., 1967. Cah. Oceanogr., 9, 729–782.Google Scholar
Eloffson, R., 1966. Sarsia, 25, 1–128.Google Scholar
Elofson, O., 1941. Zool. Bidr. Upps., 19, 215–534.Google Scholar
Fowler, G. H., 1909. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool, 10, 219–336.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 a.. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 50, 939–960.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 b.. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 50, 961–1000.Google Scholar
Furnestin, M.-L., 1960. Revue Trav. Inst. (Scient. Tech.) Pech. Marit., 24, 153–252.Google Scholar
George, J., 1969. Bull. Natn. Inst. Sci. India, 38, 641–648.Google Scholar
George, J., 1971. Crustaceana, 21, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, E. H., 1965. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 22, 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granata, L. and Caporiacco, L. Di, 1949. Result. Camp. Scient., Prince Albert I, 109, 1–51.Google Scholar
Grice, G. D. and Hart, A., 1962. Ecol. Monogr., 32, 287–309.Google Scholar
Grice, G. D. and Hulsemann, K., 1968. Deep Sea Res., 15, 229–233.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1964. Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli, 33, (Suppl), 9–31.Google Scholar
Hartman, G., 1962. Abh. Verh. Naturw. Ver. Hamburg, 7, 137–143.Google Scholar
Hillman, N. S., 1967. Antarctic J. U.S., 2, 199–200.Google Scholar
Hillman, N. S., 1968. Antarctic J. U.S., 3, 157–158.Google Scholar
Hillman, N. S., 1969 a. Antarctic J. U.S., 4, 189–190.Google Scholar
Hillman, N. S., 1969 b. Antarctic Map Folio Ser. 11, 29–30.Google Scholar
Hulings, N., 1967. Crustaceana, 13, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huré, J., 1955. Acta Adriat., 7 , 3–69.Google Scholar
Huré, J., 1961. Acta Adriat., 9, 3–59.Google Scholar
Iles, E. J., 1953. ‘Discovery’ Rep., 26, 259–280.Google Scholar
Iles, E. J., 1961. ‘Discovery’ Rep., 31, 299–326.Google Scholar
Johannes, R. E. and Satomi, M., 1966. Limnol. Oceanogr., 11, 191–197.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V., 1951. Illinois Biol. Monogr., 21, 1–324.Google Scholar
Kielhorn, W. V., 1952. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 9, 223–264.Google Scholar
Kimor, B. and Bardugo, V., 1967. Bull. St. Israel Sea Fish. Res. Stn, 45, 6–31.Google Scholar
Kiorstin, V., 1965. Tech. Rep. U.S. Navy Contract N62558.Google Scholar
Klie, W., 1944. Fich. Ident. Zooplancton, 6, 1–3.Google Scholar
Kornicker, L. S., 1968. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 81, 439–472.Google Scholar
Lakkis, S., 1971. Mar. Biol., 11, 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveau, M., 1965. Reel Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, 37, 161–243.Google Scholar
Leveau, M., 1966. Reel Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, 40, 249–252.Google Scholar
Leveau, M., 1967. Reel Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, suppl, 6, 63–70.Google Scholar
Leveau, M., 1969. Reel Trav. Stn Mar. Endoume, suppl, 8, 124–142.Google Scholar
Lochhead, J. H., 1968. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol Lab. Woods Hole, 134, 456–464.Google Scholar
Lucas, V. Z., 1931. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish., 6 , 399–410.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A., 1937. ‘Discovery’ Rep., 16, 365–412.Google Scholar
McHardy, R. A., 1964. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 21, 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHardy, R. A. and Bary, B. McK., 1965. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 22, 823–840.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K. G., 1967. In Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography, 219–238. (Ed. Adam, C. G., and Ager, D. V.) Syst. Ass. Publ, 7.Google Scholar
Menzel, D. W. and Ryther, J. H., 1961. Bermuda Biol Stn Progr. Rep., June 1,1961.Google Scholar
Miller, J. K., 1966. Scripps Instn Oceanogr., Ref. Ser. 66–15.Google Scholar
Motoda, S. and Anraku, M., 1954. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ., 5, 15–19.Google Scholar
Müller, G. W., 1894. Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 21, 1–399.Google Scholar
Müller, G. W., 1906. Wiss. Ergebn. Dt. Tiefsee-Exped., 8, 29–154.Google Scholar
Pickavance, J. R., 1970. J. Anim. Ecol, 39, 715–724.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1962. Dana Rep., 57, 1–414Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1969 a. Dana Rep., 75, 1–100.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1969 b. Vidensk. Meddr Dansk Naturh. Foren., 132, 129–197.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1969 c. Fich. Ident. Zooplancton, 115, 1–5.Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. C. and Moguilevsky, Alicia, 1971. Physis, 30, 637–666.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. and Conover, R. J., 1961. Limnol. Oceanogr., 6, 154–164.Google Scholar
Riley, G. A., 1970. Adv. Mar. Biol, 8, 1–118.Google Scholar
Rudjakov, J. A., 1962 a. Trudy Inst. Okeanol, 58, 172–201.Google Scholar
Rudjakov, J. A., 1962 b. Trudy Inst. Okeanol, 58, 165–171.Google Scholar
Rudjakov, J. A., 1967. In Bioenegetica: Biologischerskaya Spectrophotometrica, 46–52. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1928. Crustacea of Norway, 9, Bergen.Google Scholar
Seguin, G., 1965. Pelagos, 2, 7–44.Google Scholar
Seguin, G., 1966 a. Bull. Inst. Fr. Afr. Noire, 28, A, 1–90.Google Scholar
Seguin, G., 1966 b. Bull. Inst. Fr. Afr. Noire, 28, A, 1332–1355.Google Scholar
Seguin, G., 1968. Pelagos, 10, 109–132.Google Scholar
Skogsberg, T., 1920. Zool. Bidr. Upps., Suppl, 1, 1–782.Google Scholar
Skogsberg, T., 1931. Rep. Scient. Res. Michael Sars N. Atlant. Deep Sea Exped., 5, 1–26.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Z., 1952. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 9 , 16–41.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1938. Zoology Iceland, 3, 1–19.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, P. C, 1961. In Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, 404–5. Part Q, Arthropoda 3, Crustacea, Ostracoda. Geol. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
Tchinodova, J. G., 1959. Trudy Inst. Okeanol, 30, 166–189.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1962. Rapp. P.-V. Reun. Cons. Perm Int. Explor. Mer, 153, 114–120.Google Scholar
Wiborg, K. R, 1954. FiskDir. Skr. Ser. Havunders., 11, (4), 1–66.Google Scholar
Zernova, V. V., 1967. In Bioenergetica: Biologischerskaya Spectrophotometrica, 46–52. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar