Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:43:24.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutrient Chemistry of Loch Leven, Kinross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. V. Holden
Affiliation:
Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Pitlochry.
L. A. Caines
Affiliation:
Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Pitlochry.
Get access

Synopsis

A study has been made of the supply and utilisation of nitrogen and phosphorus in Loch Leven, a shallow eutrophic lake receiving discharges from sewage treatment plants, industry and agricultural sources. Calculations of the nutrient budgets over a period of several years indicate that nitrogen enters primarily as nitrate derived from agricultural fertilisers, in quantities more than sufficient to sustain the dense algal blooms which occur. Much of the nitrate appears to be removed by benthic algae, or other processes associated with the sediments, and a high proportion of the incoming nitrogen is retained in the lake.

Phosphorus enters the lake mainly from industry, with some contribution from sewage and agriculture, and a high proportion is discharged at the outflow. The algal blooms require more phosphate than is present in solution initially, and utilise it at rates greater than that of the inflowing sources, and it is deduced that the additional phosphate is derived from the sediments. A mechanism for such a release, occurring in the absence of stratification, is postulated, and the processes involved in the return of phosphorus to the sediments are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

American Public Health Association, 1960. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 11th Edn, Washington, D.Cs.Google Scholar
Bachofen, R., 1960. Stoffhaushalt und Sedimentation im Baldegger- und Hallwilesee, 118 pp. Zürich: Inaug. Diss. Juris-Verlay.Google Scholar
Bailey-Watts, A. E., Bindloss, M. E. and Belcher, J. H., 1968. Freshwater primary production by a blue-green alga of bacterial size. Nature, Land., 220, 13441345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barth, E. E., Mulbarger, M., Solotto, B. V. and Ettinger, M. B., 1966. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed., 38, 12081219.Google Scholar
Chang, S. P. and Jackson, M. L., 1957. Soil Sci., 84, 133144.Google Scholar
Holden, A. V., 1959. Sci. Invest. Freshwat. Salm. Fish. Res. Scott. Home Dep., 24, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Holden, A. V., 1961. Verh. Int. Verein Theor. Angew Limnol., 14, 247251.Google Scholar
Kear, J. 1963. Rep. Wildfowl Trust, 14, 72771.Google Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1972. Productivity studies at Loch Leven. Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater. Kazimierz Dolny 1970, 183205.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M., 1937. Salm. Trout Mag., 89, 313322.Google Scholar
Smith, I. R., 1974. The structure and physical environment of Loch Leven, Scotland. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. B., 74, 81100.Google Scholar
Vollenweider, R. A., 1968. OECD Tech. Rep. Wat. Management Res., DAS/CSI 68.27.Google Scholar