Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:06:00.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Man's use of Sitka spruce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

J. D. Brazier
Affiliation:
Princes Risborough Laboratory, Building Research Establishment, Princes Risborough, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Man's use of the timber of Sitka spruce grown in North America and in the United Kingdom is reviewed. The contrast in character and properties of the timber from the two sources is considered and an explanation for the differences given in terms of the growth. The importance of Sitka spruce to the British forest and timber industries is examined and consideration given to how Sitka spruce should be managed to ensure the production of timber which will meet the requirements of the British timber user.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1933. The Properties of Home-grown Sitka Spruce. Report of the Forest Products Research Laboratory, Princes Risborough, Proj. 0, Investigation 68 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Anon. 1973. Encyclopaedia Britannica 4, 230–8. Chicago: Wm. Benton.Google Scholar
Brazier, J.D., Hands, R., & Seal, D.T., 1985. Structural wood yields from Sitka spruce: the effect of planting spacing. Forestry and British Timber 14, 3437.Google Scholar
Latham, B., 1957. Timber; its development and distribution. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lord 1947. British Forestry. Forestry 21, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, H.N., & Craig, R.D., 1918. Forests of British Columbia. Ottawa: Commission of Conservation.Google Scholar
Woodfin, R.O., 1973. Sitka spruce…an American wood. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture Service Leaflet, FS265.Google Scholar