Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:23:06.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intertidal habitats and benthic macrofauna of the Forth estuary, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Donald S. McLusky
Donald S. McLusky
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

The intertidal habitats of the Forth estuary are dominated by fine-grained muds, which experience a salinity range of 0–32%, j over the length of the estuary from Stirling to Queensferry. The current total area of the intertidal zone is 23.3 km2, the majority of which is found in the three central bays of Skinflats, Kinneil and Torry Bay. Over the centuries, agricultural and industrial reclamation has reduced by almost 50% the size of the Forth estuary intertidal habitat. The upper estuary has narrow intertidal shores, inhabited almost exclusively by oligochaete worms, which are very abundant due to organic enrichment of the area. The middle estuary is responsible for the greatest biomass and production of the intertidal benthic macrofauna. The lower estuary has a greater diversity of species than the upper and middle estuary, but has a lower biomass and abundance of macrofauna. It is shown that the production/biomass (P/B) ratio of several species in the Forth estuary is lower than that of the same species in other estuaries. This depression cannot be explained by natural environmental variables, and is suggested as being due to the levels of pollutants throughout the area. Despite this depressed productivity, and the threats from further reclamation, the Forth estuary retains abundant populations of intertidal animals, which are an important food source for birds and fish.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 93 , Issue 3-4: The Natural Environment of the Estuary and Firth of Forth , 1987 , pp. 389 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, F. E., 1983. The northern muddy intertidal, a seasonally changing source of suspended sediment to estuarine waters—a review. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 30 (Suppl. 1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagheri, E. A., & McLusky, D. S., 1982. Population dyanamics of oligochaetes and small polychaetes in the polluted Forth estuary ecosystem. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagheri, E. A., & McLusky, D. S., 1984. The oxygen consumption of Tubificoides benedeni in relation to temperature, and its application to production biology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 78, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkhurst, R. O., 1985. A further contribution to the taxonomy of the genus Tubificoides. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadell, H. M., 1913. The story of the Forth. Glasgow: James Maclehose.Google Scholar
Davies, I. M., & Pirie, J. M., 1980. Evaluation of a “Mussel watch” project for heavy metals in Scottish coastal waters. Marine Biology 57, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M. E., 1979. Studies on the production ecology of several mollusc species in the estuarine Firth of Forth (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling).Google Scholar
Elliott, M. E., & McLusky, D. S., 1985. Invertebrate production ecology in relation to estuarine quality management. In Estuarine management and quality assessment, eds. Wilson, J. G., & Halcrow, W., pp. 85–103. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostelow, T. P., & Brown, M. A. E., 1981. Engineering geology of the upper Forth estuary. Institute of Geological Sciences report no. 81/13.Google Scholar
Hibbert, C. J., 1976. Biomass and production of a bivalve community on an intertidal mudflat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 25, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leatherland, T. M., 1987. The estuary and Firth of Forth, Scotland—uses and aims. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 285–297.Google Scholar
McCraw, R. T., 1985. An investigation into the production ecology of Nereis diversicolor and Nephtys hombergi in the intertidal Forth estuary (M.Sc., Thesis, University of Stirling).Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., 1968. Some effects of salinity on the distribution and abundance of Corophium volutator in the Ythan estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 48, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., 1971. Ecology of estuaries. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., 1978. Ecology of the Forth estuary. Forth Naturalist and Historian 3, 10–23.Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., 1981. The estuarine ecosystem. Glasgow: Blackie.Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., 1982. The impact of petrochemical effluent on the fauna of an intertidal estuarine mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 14, 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Bryant, D. B., Elliott, M. E., Tear, M., & Moffatt, G., 1976. Intertidal fauna of the industrialised Forth estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 7, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Elliott, M. E., & Warnes, J. M., 1978. The impact of pollution on the intertidal fauna of the Forth estuary. In Physiology and behaviour of marine organisms, eds. McLusky, D. S., & Berry, A. J., pp. 203–210. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Teare, M., & Phizacklea, A. P., 1980. Effects of domestic and industrial pollution on the distribution and abundance of aquatic oligochaetes in the Forth estuary. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 33, 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Anderson, F. E., & Wolfe-Murphy, S., 1983. The distribution and population recovery of Arenicola marina and other benthic fauna after bait-digging. Marine Ecology, Progress Series 11, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Anderson, F. E., & Allan, D. G., 1976. Aspects of the biology of Macoma balthica from the estuarine Firth of Forth. Journal of Molluscan Studies 42, 31–45.Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Anderson, F. E., & Elliott, M. E., 1981. The feeding and survival strategies of estuarine molluscs. In Feeding and survival strategies of estuarine organisms, ed. Jones, N. V., & Wolff, W., pp. 109–121. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Anderson, F. E., & McCrory, M., (in press). A long-term study of an estuarine mudflat subject to industrial pollution. Investigacion Pesquara.Google Scholar
Warnes, J. M., 1981. The impact of overwintering birds on the production ecology of estuarine benthic invertebrates (Ph.D., Thesis, University of Stirling).Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M., & Price, R., 1975. Macrofauna production in an estuarine habitat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 55, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, W. J., & de Wolf, L., 1977. Biomass and production of zoobenthos in the Grevelingen estuary, The Netherlands. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar