Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:24.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A History of Some of the International Fisheries Commissions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

D. H. Cushing
Get access

Extract

This paper is an account of the development of the International Fisheries Commissions. Excluded are the commissions under the aegis of FAO: an earlier group, for example the Indo-Pacific Fisheries Commission, are only advisory, and later ones, like the Atlantic Tuna Commission, have not been in existence for long enough to discern characteristics in their activity. The activities of the Russo-Japanese commissions in the north-west Pacific are also excluded, because their actions do not have great influence on the older commissions or upon the newer ones established in the last five years or so. Although the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea has now only an advisory function in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission, during its earlier history before World War II it was always able to act through the Danish Foreign Office. But a much more important point is that the International Council played a historically dominant part in the early development of many of the commissions, except of course those which originated in the north-east Pacific.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 73: Challenger Expedition Centenary Proceedings 2 , 1972 , pp. 361 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References To Literature

Report—Inter-American Tropical Tuna CommissionGoogle Scholar
Annual Report, North-East Atlantic Fishing CommissionGoogle Scholar
Annual Report Permanent CommissionGoogle Scholar
Rapport et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions—Conseil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer.Google Scholar
Report of the Commissioner of Fisheries, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
Report—International Commission for North-West Atlantic FisheriesGoogle Scholar
Report—International Fish CommissionGoogle Scholar
Report—International Fur Seal CommissionGoogle Scholar
Report—International North Pacific Fisheries CommissionGoogle Scholar
Report of the International Pacific Halibut CommissionGoogle Scholar
Report—International Whaling CommissionGoogle Scholar
Aasen, O., Andersen, K. P., Gulland, J., Popp Madsen, K. and Sahrhage, D., 1961. ICES herring tagging experiment in 1957 and 1958. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 152, 50 pp.Google Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H. and Hodder, V. M. (Eds), 1962. Report of working group of scientists on fishery assessment in relation to regulation problems. A. Proc. Int. Commn NW. Atlant. Fish. Suppl., 2, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H. and Holt, S. J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Invest., Lond., (2), 19, 533 pp.Google Scholar
Broadhead, G. C., 1959. Morphometric comparisons among yellowfin tuna, Neothunnus macropterus, from the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 3 (8), 355–391.Google Scholar
Broadhead, G. C. and Barrett, I., 1964. Some factors affecting the distribution and apparent abundance of yellowfin and skipjack tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 8 (8), 419–473.Google Scholar
Bückmann, A., 1932. Die Frage nach der Zweckmässigkeit des Schutzes untermassiger Fische und die Voraussetzungen für ihre Beantwortung. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 80 (7), 16 pp.Google Scholar
Burd, A. C., 1972. The north-east Atlantic herring and the failure of an industry. In Sea Fisheries Research (Ed. Jones, F. R. Harden). London: Logos.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. G., 1961. Population dynamics of the Alaska fur seal herd. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf., 26, 356–369.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, J. A. (Ed.), 1965. The Fisheries. Problems in Resource Management, 136 pp. Seattle: Univ. Washington.Google Scholar
Cushing, D. H., 1968. The Downs stock of herring during the period 1955–1966. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 32, 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, D. H., and Bridger, J. P., 1966. The stock of herring in the North Sea, and changes due to fishing. Fishery Invest., Lond. (2), 25 (1), 123 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, F. M., 1934. Mesh experiments with trawls 1928–1933. Fishery Invest., Lond. (2), 14 (1), 56 pp. (with an appendix by H. J. Buchanan-Wollaston).Google Scholar
Doyle, L. P., 1957. Investigation of death losses in fur seal pups on St Paul Island, June 28-August 15, 1957. MS quoted by Nagasaki.Google Scholar
Elliott, H. W., 1884. A life history of the fur seal. In The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the United States, 1, 74–113 (Ed. Goode, G. Brown).Google Scholar
Fink, B. D. and Bayliff, W. H., 1970. Migrations of yellowfin and skipjack tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean as determined by tagging experiments, 1952–1964. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 15 (1), 227 pp.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Y., 1962. On the stocks of halibut and their fisheries in the northeastern Pacific. Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 7 (5), 39–50.Google Scholar
Fukuhara, F. M., Murai, S., LaLanne, J.-J. and Sribhibhadh, A., 1962. Continental origin of red salmon as determined from morphological characters. Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 8, 15–109.Google Scholar
Garrod, D. J., 1967. Population dynamics of the Arcto-Norwegian cod. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 24, 145–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, D. J. and Clayden, A. D., 1972. Current biological problems in the conservation of deep sea fishery resources. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 29, 161–184.Google Scholar
Garstang, W, 1900–1903. The impoverishment of the sea. A critical summary of the experimental and statistical evidence bearing upon the alleged depletion of the trawling grounds. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 6, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, W, 1904. Report of the convener on comparative trawling experiments in 1903. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 2, 47–57.Google Scholar
Garstang, W, 1905 a. Report on experiments with marked fish during 1902–3.1st Report on Fishery and Hydrographical Investigations in the North Sea and Adjacent Waters (Southern Area). Rep. N. Sea Fish. Invest. Comm., Command 2670, 13–43.Google Scholar
Garstang, W, 1905 b. Report on the trawling investigations, 1902–3, with special reference to the distribution of the plaice. 1st Report on Fishery and Hydrographical Investigations in the North Sea and Adjacent Waters (Southern Area). Rep. N. Sea Fish. Invest. Comm., Command 2670, 67–197.Google Scholar
Garstang, W, 1905 c. Experiments in the transplantation of small plaice to the Dogger Bank. 1st Report on Fishery and Hydrographical Investigations in the North Sea and Adjacent Waters (Southern Area). Rep. N. Sea Fish. Invest. Comm., Command 2670, 45–65.Google Scholar
Garstang, W, 1909. The distribution of the plaice in the North Sea, Skagerak and Kattegat, according to size, age and frequency. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 11, 65–134.Google Scholar
Graham, G. M., 1935. Modern theory of exploiting a fishery, and application to North Sea trawling. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 10, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. M., 1939. The sigmoid curve and the overfishing problem. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 110, 15–20.Google Scholar
Gulland, J. A., 1961. The estimation of the effect on catches of changes in gear selectivity. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 26, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. M., 1966. The effect of regulation on Antarctic whale catches. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 30, 308–315.Google Scholar
Graham, G. M., 1968. The concept of the marginal yield from exploited fish stocks. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 32, 256–261.Google Scholar
Heincke, F., 1913. Untersuchungen über die Scholle. Generallbericht. I. Schollenfischerei und Schonmassregeln. Vorläufige kurze Üebersicht über die wichtigsten Ergebnisse des Berichts. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 16, 1–70.Google Scholar
Hennemuth, R. G., 1961. Size and year class composition of catch, age and growth of yellowfin tuna in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean for the years 1954–1958. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 5(1), 5–112.Google Scholar
Hodgson, W. C., 1957. The Herring and its Fishery, 197 pp. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hylen, A., Jonsgard, A., Pike, G. C. and Ruud, J. T., 1955. A preliminary report on the age composition of Antarctic fin whale catches 1945/46 to 1952/53, and some reflections on total mortality rates of fin whales. Norsk Hvalfangsttid., 10, 577–589.Google Scholar
ICES, 1957. International Fisheries Convention 1946: report of the ad hoc Committee established at the fourth meeting of the Permanent Commission, September 1955. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 23, 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICES, 1960. International Fisheries Convention of 1946. Committee on Mesh Difficulties. Report of the Scientific Sub-committee, presented at the seventh meeting of the Permanent Commission, November 1958. Rapp. P.-V. Reun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 151, 39 pp.Google Scholar
ICES, 1965. The North Sea herring being the Report of the North Sea Working Group to the Herring Committee of ICES. ICES Co-op. Res. Rep. 4, 57 pp.Google Scholar
ICES, 1966. Arctic Fisheries Working Group. Report of meeting in Hamburg, 18–23 January 1965. Annex 1 to the 1965 Liasion Committee report. ICES Co-op. Res. Rep, B, 15–32.Google Scholar
INPFC, 1962. The exploitation, scientific investigation and management of halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis Schmidt) stocks on the Pacific coast of North America in relation to the abstention provisions of the North Pacific Fisheries Convention. Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 7, 93 pp.Google Scholar
International Commission on Whaling, 1964. Fourteenth Report of the Commission (covering the fourteenth fiscal year 1 June 1962 to 31 May 1963). Rep. Int. Commn Whal, 122 pp.Google Scholar
Joseph, J., Alverson, F. G., Fink, B. D. and Davidoff, E. B., 1964. A review of the population structure of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 9 (2), 55–112.Google Scholar
Kenyon, K. W., Scheffer, V. B. and Chapman, D. G., 1954. A population study of the Alaska fur-seal herd. Spec. Scient. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., 12, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Kipling, R., 1894. The White Seal. In The Jungle Book. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klawe, W. L., 1963. Observations on the spawning of four species of tuna (Neothunnus macropterus, Katsuwonus pelamis, Auxis thazard and Euthynnus lineatus) in the eastern Pacific Ocean, based on the distribution of their larvae and juveniles. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 6 (9), 449–540.Google Scholar
Larrañeta, M. G., 1967. Ecologia marina. Fundacion la salle, Caracas.Google Scholar
Laws, R. M. and Purves, P. C., 1956. The ear plug of the Mysticeti as an indication of age with special reference to the North Atlantic fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus Linn.). Norsk. Hvalfangsttid., 45, 413–425.Google Scholar
Manzer, J. I., Ishida, T., Peterson, A. E. and Hanavan, M. G., 1965. Salmon of the North Pacific Ocean. Part V. Offshore distribution of salmon. Bull. Int. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 15, 1–452.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., 1963. Parasites as indicators of the geographical origin of sockeye salmon, Onchorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), occurring in the North Pacific Ocean and adjacent seas. Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Int. Fish. Commn, 11, 101–156.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Cleaver, F. C., Fukuda, Y. and Godfrey, H., 1966. Salmon of the North Pacific. Part VI. Sockeye salmon in offshore waters. Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 20, 1–70.Google Scholar
Nagasaki, F., 1961. Population study on the fur seal herd. Contrib. B. 365, Coll. Repr. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab., 1961, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Olson, O. W., 1958. Hookworms, Uncinaria lucasi Stiles, 1901, in fur seals, Callorhinus ursinus (Linn.), on the Pribilov Islands. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf, 23, 152–175.Google Scholar
Ottestad, P., 1956. On the size of the stock of Antarctic fin whales relative to the size of the catch. Norsk. Hvalfangsttid., 45, 298–308.Google Scholar
Parrish, B. B. and Saville, A., 1967. Changes in the Fisheries of North Sea and Atlanto-Scandian Herring Stocks and their Causes. In Oceanography and Marine Biology, 5, 409–449 (Ed. by Barnes, Harold).Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1894. On the biology of our flat-fishes and on the decrease of our flat-fish fisheries. Rep. Dan. Biol. Stn, 1893 (4), 146 pp.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1900. What is over-fishing? J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 6, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., Garstang, W. and Kyle, H. M., 1907. Summary-report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the plaice and plaice-fisheries A. of the Kattegat B. of the North Sea. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 7C, 54–150.Google Scholar
Ricker, W. E., 1948. Methods of estimating vital statistics of fish populations. Indiana Univ. Publs Set Ser., 15, 101 pp.Google Scholar
Riley, F., 1967. Fur seal industry of the Pribilov Islands, 1786–1965. Circ. Fish Wildl. Serv., Wash., 275, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, R., 1910. The Prevention of Malaria. London.Google Scholar
Royce, W. F., 1964. A morphometric study of yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre). Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., 63, 395–443.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S., 1931. Some theroretical considerations on the overfishing problem.J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 6, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. S., 1939. An elementary treatment of the overfishing problem. Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 110, 5–14.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M. B., 1954. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 1, 27–56.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M. B., 1955. Morphometric comparison of yellowfin tuna from southeast Polynesia, Central America and Hawaii. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 1, 91–136.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M. B., 1957. A study of the dynamics of the fishery for yellowfin tuna in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 2, 245–285.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M. B. and Orange, C. J., 1956. Studies of the sexual development and spawning of yellowfin tuna (Neothunnus macropterus) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) in three areas of the eastern Pacific Ocean, by examination of gonads. Bull. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Commn, 1, 283–349.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. C. and Outram, D. N., 1953. Results of investigation of the herring populations on the west coast and lower east coast of Vancouver Island in 1952–53, with an analysis of fluctuations in population abundance since 1946–47. Rep. Prov. Dep. Fish. Br. Columb., 1952, 57–84.Google Scholar
Suda, A., 1970. Approximate estimation of parameters in dynamics of fish population utilising effort and catch statistics with little information on biological features. Bull. Far Seas Fish. Res. Lab., 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S., 1962. On the salmon stocks of the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada (views of the Japanese National Section on the abstention cases of the United States and Canada). Bull. Int. N. Pacif. Fish. Commn, 9, 69–84.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. H. C. and Wickett, W. P., 1967. Recent changes in abundance of British Columbia herring, and future prospects. Circ. Biol. Stn, Nanaimo, 80, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Tester, A. L., 1935. The herring-fishery of British Columbia—past and present. Rep. Prov. Dep. Fish. Br. Columb., 1934, 76–102.Google Scholar
Tester, A. L., 1948. The efficacy of catch limitations in regulating the British Columbia herring fishery. Trans. Roy. Soc. Can., 42 (3/5), 135–163.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F., 1916. The problem of the halibut. Rep. Prov. Dep. Fish. Br. Columb., 1915,130–140.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F., 1917. The regulation of the halibut fishery of the Pacific. Rep. Prov. Dep. Fish. Br. Columb., 1916, 28–34.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F., 1945. Effect of the obstruction at Hell's Gate on the sockeye salmon of the Fraser River. Bull. Int. Pacif. Salm. Fish. Commn, 1, 175 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F., 1950. The effect of fishing on stocks of halibut in the Pacific. Publs Fish. Res. Inst., Seattle, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. and Bell, F. H., 1934. Biological statistics of the Pacific halibut fishery. (2) Effects of changes in intensity upon total yield and yield per unit of gear. Rep. Int. Fish. Commn, 8, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. and Freeman, N., 1930. History of the halibut fishery. Rep. Int. Fish. Commn, 5, 61 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. and Herrington, W. C., 1930. Life history of the Pacific halibut. 1. Marking experiments. Rep. Int. Fish. Commn, 2, 137 pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. and van Cleve, R., 1936. Life history of the Pacific halibut. 2. Distribution and early life history. Rep. Int. Fish. Commn, 9, 184 pp.Google Scholar
Volterra, V., 1927. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi Memorie R. Com. Talassogr. Ital., 131, 142pp.Google Scholar