Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T02:47:35.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of pteridophyte–arthropod interactions in the fossil record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. C. Scott ,
W. G. Chaloner  and
S. Paterson
A. C. Scott
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Chelsea College, University of London, 552 Kings Road, London SW10 0UA, U.K.
W. G. Chaloner
Affiliation:
Botany Department, Royal Holloway and Bedford Colleges, University of London, Virginia Water, Surrey, U.K.
S. Paterson
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Chelsea College, University of London, 552 Kings Road, London SW10 0UA, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

The past decade has seen the emergence of significant fossil evidence of a history of pterodophytearthropod interaction extending back to the Devonian period. Such fossils include plant tissue showing lesions, bites and borings with associated features implicating arthropods as causal agents. Gut contents of Carboniferous arthropods, which include lycopod xylem elements and spores, are a tangible demonstration of phytophagy. Pteridophyte spores in fossil droppings (coprolites) indicate the prevalence of arthropod spore-eating in the Palaeozoic. This may have had compensations for the source plant and evidently represented the start of the co–evolution which culminated in the elaborate adaptations shown by flowering plants and their insect pollination vectors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 86: The Biology of Pteridophytes , 1985 , pp. 133 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxendale, R. W., 1979. Plant bearing coprolites from North American Pennsylvanian Coal Balls. Palaeontology 22, 537–548.Google Scholar
Chaloner, W. G., 1976. The evolution of adaptive features in fossil exines. In Evolutionary significance of the exine, ed. Ferguson, I. K. and Muller, J., pp. 1–14. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Condon, M. and Whalen, M.D., 1983. A plea for collection and preservation of herbivore and pathogen damaged plant materials. Taxon 32, 105–107.Google Scholar
Cooper-Driver, G., 1978. Insect–fern Associations. Entomologia Exp. App. 24, 110–116.Google Scholar
Crepet, W. L., 1979a. Some aspects of the pollination biology of Middle Eocene angiosperms. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 27, 213–238.Google Scholar
Crepet, W. L., 1979b, Insect pollination: a palaeontological perspective. Bioscience 29, 102–108.Google Scholar
De Witt, West. 1962. Notes on the Oliver collection of Carboniferous plants. 3. Wound reactions in a petiole of Ankyropteris westphaliensis Bertrand. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 5, 185–191.Google Scholar
Frankland, J. C., 1966. Succession of fungi on decaying petioles of Pteridium aquilinum. J. Ecol. 54, 41–63.Google Scholar
Gerson, U., 1979. The associations between pteridophytes and arthropods. Fern Gaz. 12, 29–45.Google Scholar
Gilbert, L. E., 1979. Development of theory in the analysis of insect–plant interactions. In Analysis of ecological systems, ed. Horn, D. J. et al. , pp. 117–154. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, T. M., 1957. How we study fossil plants: Caytonia. New Biol. 22, 24–38.Google Scholar
Hill, C. R., 1976. Coprolites of Ptilophyllum cuticles from the Middle Jurassic of North Yorkshire. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.) 27, 289–294.Google Scholar
Kevan, P. G. and Baker, H. G., 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. A. Rev. Ent. 407–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P. G., Chaloner, W. G. and Savile, D. B. O., 1975. Interrelationships of early terrestrial arthropods and plants. Palaeontology 18, 391–417.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. L., 1981. Stratigraphic occurrences and vegetational patterns of Pennsylvania pteridosperms in Euramerican coal swamps. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 32, 5–26.Google Scholar
Philllips, T. L. and Dimichelle, W. A., 1981. Paleoecology of Middle Pennsylvanian age coal swamps in the southern Illinois/Herrin Coal Member at Sahara Mine No. 6. In Paleobotany, Paleoecology & Evolution, ed. Niklas, K., Vol. 1, pp. 231–284. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Peppers, R. A., Avcin, M. J. and Laughnan, P. F., 1974. Fossil plants and coal patterns and change in Pennsylvanian coal swamps of the Illinois Basin. Science, N.Y. 184, 1367–1369.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I., 1980. Early invertebrate terrestrial faunas. In The terrestrial environment and origin of land vertebrates, ed. Panchen, A. L., Systematics Association Symposium Special Volume, 15, pp. 117–157. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I., 1982. Ancient air breathers. Bull. Field Mus. Nat. His. 53, 12–16.Google Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I. and Ingham, J. K., 1967. Limb structure, affinity and diet of the Carboniferous ‘centipede’. Arthropleura. Scott. J. Geol. 3, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, G. and Scott, A. C., 1983. Coprolites within marattiaceous fern stems (Psaronius magnificus) from the Upper Pennsylvanian of the Appalachian Basin. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. & Palaeoecol. 41, 227–232.Google Scholar
Scott, A. C., 1977. Coprolites containing plant material from the Carboniferous of Britain. Palaeontology 20, 59–68.Google Scholar
Scott, A. C., 1978. Sedimentological and ecological control of Westphalian B plant assemblages from West Yorkshire. Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc. 41, 461–508.Google Scholar
Scott, A. C., 1979. The ecology of coal measure floras from Northern Britain. Proc. Geol. Ass. 90, 97–116.Google Scholar
Scott, A. C. and Paterson, S., 1984. Techniques in the study of plant–arthropod interactions in the fossil record. Geobios Mem. Special 8, 449–455.Google Scholar
Scott, A. C. and Taylor, T. N., 1983. Plant–animal interactions during the Upper Carboniferous. Bot. Rev. 49, 259–307.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1923. The use of the microscope in palaeobotanical research. J. Roy. Micros. Soc. 229–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1924. On a new species of Tempskya from Montana: Tempskya knowltoni Sp. Nov. Ann. Bot. 38, 485–505.Google Scholar
Smart, J. and Hughes, N. P., 1973. The insect and the plant: progressive palaeoecological integration. In Insect–plant relationships, ed. Van Emden, H. F., Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond. 6, 143–155.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., 1973. The insect–plant relationship—an evolutionary perspective. In Insect–plant relationships, ed. Van Emden, H. F., Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond. 6, 3–30.Google Scholar
Stopes, M., 1907. A note on wounded Calamities. Ann. Bot. 21, 277–280.Google Scholar
Swain, T., 1978. Plant–animal co–evolution: A synoptic view of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. In Biochemical aspects of plant and animal co–evolution, ed. Harborne, J. B., London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. N. and Scott, A. C., 1983. Interactions of plants and animals during the Carboniferous. Bioscience 33, 488–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M., 1930. Note on a wounded lepidodendroid axis. Mem. Proc. Manchr Lit. Phil. Soc. 73, 75–82.Google Scholar
Wooton, R. J., 1981. Palaeozoic insects. A. Rev. Ent. 26, 319–344.Google Scholar