Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:47:35.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer-aided drug discovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

W. Graham Richards
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Molecular Sciences and Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis:

The role of computers in drug discovery depends on just how much is known about the target macromolecule. If atomic detail of the receptor is known, binding free energy differences between drug variants may be computed. Major effort is being expended in extending the area of applicability of such studies by predicting protein structure based on homologies with known protein crystal data. Where no target structure is available, computational methods can provide leads by defining transition state structures and then using the approach of molecular similarity to define stable mimics to act as blockers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, J. E., Morris, G. M. & Richards, W. G. 1991. Electron transport in cytochromes P-450 by covalent switching. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 245, 4351.Google ScholarPubMed
Burt, C. 1990. ASP, Oxford Molecular Ltd., Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, OX4 4GA.Google Scholar
Burt, C. & Richards, W. G. 1990. Molecular similarity: the introduction of flexible fitting. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 4, 23–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, C., Richards, W. G. & Huxley, P. 1990. The application of molecular similarity calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 11, 1139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essex, J. W., Reynolds, C. A. & Richards, W. G. 1989. Relative partition coefficients from partition functions: a theoretical approach to drug transport. Journal of the Chemical Society. Chemical Communications 853–5.Google Scholar
Gago, F. & Richards, W. G. 1990. Netropsin binding to poly[d(IC)].poly[IC] and [poly[d(GC)].poly[d(GC)]: a computer simulation. Molecular Pharmacology 37, 341–6.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. 1991. A method for protein structure prediction using a novel digital encoding algorithm. Journal of Molecular Graphics (in press).Google Scholar
Haworth, I. S., Rodger, A. & Richards, W. G. 1991a. A molecular mechanics study of spermine complexation to DNA: a new model for spermine/poly(dG-dC) binding. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 244, 107–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Haworth, I. S., Elcock, A. H., Rodger, A. & Richards, W. G. 1991b. Sequence selective binding of A-tris (1,10 phenanthroline) ruthenium II to DNA. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 9, 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menziani, M. C., Cocchi, M., De Benedetti, P. G., Gilbert, R. G., Richards, W. G., Zamai, M. & Caiolfa, V. R. 1991. A theoretical study of the structure of big endothelin. Journal de Chimie Physique – in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, G. 1988. The matching of protein sequences using colour intrasequence homology displays. Journal of Molecular Graphics 6, 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, G. 1989. CAMELEON, Oxford Molecular Ltd., Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, OX4 4GA.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. 1947. The mechanism of enzyme action. American Scientist 36, 51–8.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. A., King, P. M. & Richards, W. G. 1988. Computed redox potentials and the design of bioreductive agents. Nature 334, 80–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, W. G. & Hodgin, E. E. 1988. Molecular similarity. Chemistry in Britain 24, 1141–4.Google Scholar
Richards, W. G. & Reynolds, C. A. 1990. Bioreductive anti-cancer drugs. In Theoretical Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, pp. 321–8, Beveridge, D. L. & Lavery, R. New York: Adenine Press.Google Scholar