Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-5ws7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T22:52:21.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colonisation of hair in disturbed soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

H. T. Tribe
H. T. Tribe
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, The University, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3DX, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Laboratory soil samples are disturbed soils which resemble the arable condition so common in the external world. They have many advantages for study of colonisation of buried substrates and activity may be monitored continuously by the use of a newly-developed automatic electrolytic respirometer. A condensed account of experiments is given in which colonisation of hair in soil samples is followed by measurement of overall metabolism and by direct microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 94: Fungi and Ecological Disturbance , 1988 , pp. 109 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

English, M. P., 1965. The saprophytic growth of non-keratinophilic fungi on keratinized substrata, and a comparison with keratinophilic fungi. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 48, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onsberg, P., 1979. Some dermatophytes and other keratinophilic fungi from Denmark. Mykosen 22, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, H. T., & Abu El-Souod, S. M., 1979. Colonization of hair in soil-water cultures with particular reference to the genera Pilimelia and Spirillospora (Actinomycetales). Nova Hedwigia 31, 789–805.Google Scholar
Tribe, H. T., & Maynard, P., 1988. A new automatic electrolytic soil respirometer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 94B, 178–181.Google Scholar