Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:08:01.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anti-oil pollution strategy in Sullom Voe—environmental considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

W. J. Syratt  and
M. G. Richardson
W. J. Syratt
Affiliation:
Sullom Voe Terminal Project, Shetland
M. G. Richardson
Affiliation:
Nature Conservancy Council, Shetland
Get access

Synopsis

This paper describes briefly the history behind oil pollution contingency planning for Sullom Voe. It describes in detail the environmental factors which have been considered when drawing up the Sullom Voe Harbour Oil Spill Plan. These factors are:

1. The nature of the sea zones within the Oil Spill Control Area.

2. The nature of the coastline within the Oil Spill Control Area.

In both cases accessibility of the various zones, and how this will affect contingency planning, is discussed.

3. Wildlife and conservation interests including: (a) ornithological interests; (b) mammals; (c) inshore fisheries; (d) salt marshes and soft mud shores; (e) houbs and other sensitive shallow water areas; (f) Sites of Special Scientific Interest SSSI's and Nature Reserves; (g) secondary beach structures; (h) sand amenity beaches and (i) other amenity areas, e.g. harbours.

Finally the strategy, based on the factors summarized above, and its effectiveness in the light of an oil spill, is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 80: The marine environment of Sullom Voe and the implication of oil developments , 1981 , pp. 33 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Admiralty. 1960. North Sea Pilot, Volume 1, Comprising the Faroes, Shetland Isles and Orkney Isles. Taunton: Hydrographic Department S.D. No. 52.Google Scholar
The Admiralty. 1978. Hydrographic Chart No. 3298, Yell Sound. Taunton: Hydrographic Department.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. S., 1978. Internal report on the Shetland Common Seal Survey, 1978. Unpublished report to the Sea Mammals Research Unit (NERC).Google Scholar
Anderson, S. S., 1981. Seals in Shetland waters. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 80B, 181–188.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, D., Da, C., Enticott, J. W., and Schofield, R. A., 1979. Surveys of breeding seabirds in Yell Sound and Hermaness, Shetland, Summer 1978. Unpublished Report to Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group.Google Scholar
Blackman, D. L., Graff, J., and Vassie, J. M., 1981. Tidal currents in Yell Sound and the outer regions of Sullom Voe. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 80B, 73–90.Google Scholar
Cramp, S., Bourne, W. R. P., and Saunders, D., 1974. The Seabirds of Britain and Ireland. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Dudley, G., 1976. The Incidence and Treatment of Oil Pollution in Oil Ports. In Marine Ecology and Oil Pollution, ed. Baker, J. M., pp. 27–40. Barking: Applied Science Publishers (for the Institute of Petroleum, Great Britain).Google Scholar
Erlinge, S., 1968. Territoriality of the otter Lutra lutra L. Oikos 19, 259–270.Google Scholar
Flinn, D., 1974. The Coastline of Shetland. In The Natural Environment of Shetland, ed. Goodier, R., pp. 12–23. Edinburgh: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. A., 1978. Ecological studies in the Maritime Approaches to the Shetland Oil Terminal. Unpublished Report to the Leicester Polytechnic (pt. 1).Google Scholar
Her Majesty's Stationary Office. 1978. Eleni V. 4th report of the Select Committee for Science and Technology. Command Doc. No. 7429 London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. 1975. Report to the Nature Conservancy Council on some aspects of the Ecology of Shetland. The Coast of Shetland. 6.1 Coastal Habitats–physical characteristics. Cambridge: I.T.E.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H., and Hewson, R., 1978. Spacing and foraging of otters (Lutra lutra L) in a Marine Environment. J. Zool., London 185, 205–212.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. G., 1977. Grey Seal Survey: Shetland 1977. Unpublished report to the Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. G., Dunnet, G. M., and Kinnear, P. K., 1981. Monitoring seabirds in Shetland. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 80B, 157–179.Google Scholar
Shetland Islands Council. 1978. Shetland Islands Anti-Oil Pollution Scheme. S.I.C., Lerwick, Shetland.Google Scholar
Shetland Islands Council. 1979. Tidal Stream Atlas: Approach to Port of Sullom Voe. S.I.C., Ports and Harbours Department, Sella Ness, Shetland.Google Scholar
Smith, A. S., Hays, S., Emerson, T. N., and Deeming, K. R., 1976. Oceanographic Study, Calback Ness, Sullom Voe. Phase 2. Glasgow: Marine Investigation and Services Ltd,Google Scholar
Stanley, S. O., Grantham, B. E., Leftley, J. W., and Robertson, N., Mrs 1981. Some aspects of the sediment chemistry of Sullom Voe, Shetland. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 80B, 91–100.Google Scholar
Sullom Voe Environmental Advisory Group. 1976. Oil Terminal at Sullom Voe–Environmental Impact Assessment. Sandwick, Shetland: Thuleprint.Google Scholar
Sullom Voe Oil Spill Advisory Committee. 1978. Sullom Voe Harbour Oil Spill Plan. Sella Ness, Shetland: SVOSAC.Google Scholar
Vaughan, R. W., 1977. Grey Seal Survey: Shetland 1977. Unpublished report to the Sea Mammals Research Unit (NERC).Google Scholar
Watson, H., 1978. Coastal otters (Lutra lutra L) in Shetland. Unpublished report to the Vincent Wildlife Trust.Google Scholar
West, R. B., 1975. The Suffolk otter survey. The findings of a three year survey. Suff. Nat. Hist. 16(6), 378–388.Google Scholar