Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:38:25.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air pollution and vegetation: hypothesis, field exposure, and experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

M. H. Unsworth
M. H. Unsworth
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Environmental Science, University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Unravelling the subtle effects of air pollution on vegetation requires adherence to the experimental method for testing hypotheses. Three experimental approaches are described. Field release of pollutants causes minimal disturbance of other aspects of the environment but is difficult to control and to operate continuously. Closed chambers, such as glasshouses, are furthest removed from field conditions but many aspects of their environments can be controlled. There is scope for the more sophisticated use of computer controlled glasshouses to investigate responses of stands of crop plants and natural/semi natural communities. Open-top chambers (OTCs) are a popular research tool, but results from major studies such as the U.S. National Crop Loss Assessment Network are of uncertain general value. Incursion of air into the tops of OTCs creates vertical pollution gradients. Evaporation, and the stomatal control of transpiration in OTCs may be very different from that in the field. Uptake of pollutant gases in OTCs may also differ from that in the field, directly because of differences in air movement, and/or indirectly through differences in the distribution of temperatures and moisture.

The development and design of a U.K. research programme on red spruce is used to illustrate (i) the need to develop hypotheses from a wide range of observations, (ii) the advantages of using a range of experimental approaches and (iii) the requirement to synthesise results before reaching general conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 97: Acidic Deposition: Its Nature and Impacts , 1990 , pp. 139 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. S., Stephenson, S. L. & Biasing, T. J. 1985. Growth-trend declines in spruce and fir in mid-Appalachian subalpine forests. Environmental and Experimental Botany 25, 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. M., Glyer, J. D. & McCarl, B. A. 1988. The NCLAN economic assessment: approach, findings and implications. In Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants, pp. 473–504, eds Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K. & Fullwood, A. E. 1986. Leaf damage following crop spraying in winter barley exposed to sulphur dioxide. Crop Protection 5, 365–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K. Unsworth, M. H. & Greenwood, P. 1982. Leaf injury on wheat plants exposed in the Held in winter to SO2. Nature (Lond.) 299, 149–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K. Colls, J. J., Fullwood, A. E. & Seaton, G. G. R. 1986. Depression of growth and yield in winter barley exposed to sulphur dioxide in the field. New Phytologist 104, 233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K., Fullwood, A. E. & Colls, J. J. 1987. Tillering and leaf area of winter barley exposed to sulphur dioxide in the field. New Phytologist 107, 373–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, J. N. B. & Mudd, C. H. 1976. Sulphur dioxide resistance in plants: a case study of Lolium perenne. In Effects of air pollutants on plants, pp. 87–103, ed., Mansfield, T. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., Sheppard, L. J., Smith, R. I., & Murray, M. B. 1985. Autumn frost damage to young Picea sitchensis 2. Shoot frost hardening and the probability of frost damage in Scotland. Forestry 58, 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cape, J. N., Leith, I. D., Fowler, D., Murray, M. B., Sheppard, L. J., Eamus, D. & Wilson, R. H. F. 1991. Sulphate and ammonium in mist impair the frost hardening of red spruce seedlings. New Phytologist (in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEC 1986. Microclimate and plant growth in open-top chambers. Air Pollution Research Report 5, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Colls, J. J. & Baker, C. K. 1988. The methodology of open field fumigation. In Pollution and Ecosystems, pp. 361–71, ed., Mathy, P. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colls, J. J., Geissler, P. A. & Baker, C. K. 1991. Use of a field release system to distinguish the effects of dose and concentration of sulphur dioxide on winter barley. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment (in press).Google Scholar
Cowling, E., Krahl-Urban, B. & Schimansky, Chr. 1988. Hypotheses to explain forest decline. In Forest Decline, pp. 120–5, eds, Krahl-Urban, B., Papke, H. E., Peters, K. & Schimansky, Chr. Mich, FRG: Julich Nuclear Research Centre.Google Scholar
Crout, N. M. J., Gregson, K. & Unsworth, M. H. 1990. TLM: a technique with application in the numerical solution of diffusion problems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 51, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, D. C. & Hudson, J. P. 1967. Local advection over crops and fallow. I. Changes in evaporation rates along a 17 km transect in the Sudan Gezira. Agricultural Meteorology 4, 339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denmead, O. T. & Shaw, R. H. 1962. Availability of soil water to piants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions. Agronomy Journal 54, 385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, G. J., Unsworth, M. H. & Harvey, M. J. (1983). Pollutant transfer in upland regions by occult precipitation. Nature (Lond.) 302, 241–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D., Cape, J. N., Deans, J. D., Leith, I. D., Murray, M. B., Smith, R. I., Sheppard, L. J. & Unsworth, M. H. 1989. Effects of acid mist on the frost hardiness of red spruce seedlings. New Phytologist 113, 321–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedland, A. J., Gregory, R. A., Karenlampi, L. & Johnson, A. H. 1984. Winter damage to foliage as a factor in red spruce decline. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14, 963–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P., Greenhalgh, A., Baker, C. K. & Unsworth, M. H. 1982. A computer-controlled system for exposing field crops to gaseous air pollutants. Atmospheric Environment 16, 2261–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heagle, A. S., Body, E. E. & Heck, W. W. 1973. An open-top field chamber to assess the impact of air pollution on plants. Journal of Environmental Quality 2, 365–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heagle, A. S., Kress, L. W., Temple, P. J., Kohut, R., Miller, J. E. & Heggestad, H. E. 1988. Factors influencing ozone dose-yield response relationships in open-top field chamber studies. In Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants, pp. 141–79, eds. Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, P. G. & McNaughton, K. G. 1986. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. In Advances in Ecological Research, pp. 1–49, eds, Macfadyen, A. & Ford, E. D. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. H. & Siccama, T. G. 1983. Acid deposition and forest decline. Environmental Science and Technology 17, 294a–305a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, R. 1891. Urer bakteriologische Forschung. Verhandlungendes Internationaler Medizinischer Kongress 10th, 1989, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar
Last, F. T. 1989. Experimental investigation of forest decline: the use of open-top chambers. In Statuskolloquium des PEF 1989, pp. 141–172. Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Leith, I. D., Murray, M. B., Sheppard, L. J., Cape, J. N., Deans, J. D., Smith, R. I. & Fowler, D. 1989. Visible foliar injury of red spruce seedlings subjected to simulated acid mist. New Phvtologist 113, 313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leuning, R. & Foster, I. J. 1990. Estimation of transpiration by single trees: comparison of ventilated chamber, leaf energy budgets and a combination equation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 51, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Cotham, D. A., Sheppard, L. J. & Francis, B. J. 1988. Growth responses and delayed winter hardening in Sitka spruce following summer exposure to ozone. New Phytologist 108, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdowall, F. D. H., Mukammal, E. I. & Cole, A. F. W. 1964. Direct correlation of air-polluting ozone and tobacco weather-fleck. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 44, 410–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, A. R. 1988. Effects of open-air fumigation with sulphur dioxide on the occurrence of fungal pathogens in winter cereals. Phytopathology 78, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, A. R. & Baker, C. K., 1988. The use of open field systems to assess yield response to gaseous pollutants. In Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants, pp. 181–210, eds, Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, A. R., Fackrell, J. E. & Alexander, K. 1985. Open-air fumigation of field crops: criteria and design for a new experimental system. Atmospheric Environment 19, 1639–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, A. R., Holland, M. R., Shaw, P. J. A., Sutherland, P. M., Darrall, N. M. & Skeffington, R. A. 1990. Enhancement of nitrogen deposition to forest trees exposed to sulphur dioxide. Nature (Lond.) 347, 277–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandl, R. H., Weinstein, L. H., McCune, D. C. & Keveny, M. 1973. A cylindrical, open-top chamber for exposure of plants to air pollutants in the field. Journal of Environmental Quality 2, 371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathy, P. 1988a. The European Open-top Chambers Programme: objectives and implementation. In Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants, pp. 505–13, eds, Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathy, P. (editor) 1988b. Air Pollution and Ecosystems. Dordrecht: D Reidel, 981 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. B. & Saffell, R. A. 1986. Computer control of humidity in experimental glasshouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 33, 213–21.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. B., Marshall, B., Saffell, R. A. & Harris, D. 1987. Computer control of carbon dioxide concentration in experimental glasshouses and its use to estimate net canopy photosynthesis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 40, 279–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. R., Parmeter, J. R., Taylor, O. C. & Cardiff, E. A. 1963. Ozone injury to the foliage of Pinus ponderosa. Phytopathology 53, 1072–6.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L., Marshall, B., Saffell, R. A., Clarke, D., Gallagher, J. N., Gregory, P. J., Ong, C. K., Squire, G. R. & Terry, A. 1983. Environmental control of a glasshouse suite for crop physiology. Journal of Experimental Botany 34, 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L., Marshall, B., Saffell, R. A., Clarke, D., Gallagher, J. N., Gregory, P. J., Ong, C. K., Squire, G. R. & Unsworth, M. H. 1990. Principles of Environmental Physics, 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Mooi, J. & van der Zalm, A. J. A. 1986. Research on the effects of higher than ambient concentrations of SO2 and NO2 on vegetation under semi-natural conditions. The developing and testing of a field fumigation system: Final report. Research Institute for Plant Protection, Report R317, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Neighbour, E. A., Cottam, D. A. & Mansfield, T. A. 1988. Effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on the control of water loss by birch. New Phytologist 108, 149–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neighbour, E. A., Cottam, D. A., Pearson, M. & Mehlhorn, H. 1990a. Purafil-filtration prevents the development of ozone-induced frost injury: a potential role for nitric oxide. Atmospheric Environment 24A, 711–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neighbour, E. A., Pearson, M., Pearson, M., Paul, N. D., Wood, W. A., Smith, P. J., Johnston, G. K. & Caporn, S. J. M. 1990b. A small-scale controlled environment chamber for the investigation of the effects of pollutant gases on plants growing at cool or sub-zero temperatures. Environmental Pollution 64, 155–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, E. M. & Tingey, D. T. 1988. The NCLAN Program for crop loss assessment. In Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants, pp. 45–62, eds. Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, J. O., Lesser, V. M. & Dassel, K. A. 1988. Statistical approaches to assessing crop losses. In Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants, eds. Heck, W. W.. Taylor, O. C. & Tingey, D. T. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sheppard, L. J., Smith, R. I. & Cannell, M. G. R. 1989. Frost hardiness of Pieea rubens growing in spruce decline regions of the Appalachians. Tree Physiology 5, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, M. H. 1982. Exposure to gaseous pollutants and uptake by plants. In Effects of Gaseous Air Pollution in Agriculture and Horticulture, pp. 43–63, eds, Unsworth, M. H. & Ormrod, D. P. London: Butterworths Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, M. H. 1986. Principles of microclimate and plant growth in open-top chambers. In Microclimate and Plant Growth in Open-top Chambers, pp. 16–29, Air Pollution Research Report 5. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Unsworth, M. H. & Crossley, A. 1987. Consequences of cloud water deposition on vegetation at high elevation. In Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants on Forests, Wetlands and Agricultural Ecosystems, pp. 171–88, eds, Hutchinson, T. C. & Meema, K. M. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, M. H., Heagle, A. S. & Heck, W. W. 1984a. Gas exchange in open-top field chambers – I. Measurement and analysis of atmospheric resistances to gas exchange. Atmospheric Environment 18, 373–80.Google Scholar
Unsworth, M. H., Heagle, A. S., & 1984b. Gas exchange in open-top field chambers – II. Resistance to ozone uptake by soybeans. Atmospheric Environment 18, 381–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, M. E. & Freer-Smith, P. H. 1982. Growth effects of SO2 and–or NO2 on woody plants and grasses during spring and summer. Nature (Lond.) 300, 55–7.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, J. & Mansfield, T. A. 1991. Physiological disturbances in plants caused by air pollutants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 97B, (for 1990), 117–38.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, J., Pearson, M. & Francis, B. J. 1991. Effects of over-winter fumigation with sulphur and nitrogen dioxides on biochemical parameters and spring growth in red spruce. Plant, Cell and Environment (submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar