Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:23:08.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXI.—Studies on Flowering-Plant Growth and Organogenesis. I. Morphogenetic Effects of 2, 3, 5-Triiodobenzoic Acid on Cannabis sativa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

J. Heslop-Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The Queen's University, Belfast.
Y. Heslop-Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The Queen's University, Belfast.
Get access

Synopis

Notwithstanding its reported effect upon the levels of native auxin in plant tissues, 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) does not influence sex expression in Cannabis sativa, a dioecious species in which there is evidence that flower sexuality may be regulated by auxin levels in the neighbourhood of developing primordia. The total production of flowers is, however, increased in both sexes by TIBA, an effect possibly resulting from an alleviation of the correlative inhibition of lateral buds. Whilst hardly influencing morphogenetic activity at a cellular level at all, TIBA treatment leads to gross ontogenetic abnormalities, of which the common feature is a tendency for the elimination of localized growth and the substitution instead of generalized growth fields, resulting in the formation of infundibuliform and cylindrical foliar and floral structures. It seems probable that the bulk of the effects of TIBA in the plant may be due to an influence on auxin distribution, perhaps through interference with the mechanism of polar transport.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Audus, L. J., and Thresh, R., 1956 a. “The effects of synthetic growth substances in the level of endogenous auxins in plants”, The chemistry and mode of action of plant growth substances, ed. Wain, R. L. and Wightman, F., 248–252.Google Scholar
Audus, L. J., and Thresh, R., 1956 b. “The effects of synthetic growth regulator treatments on the levels of free endogenous growth substances in plants”, Ann. Bot. Lond., 20, 439459.Google Scholar
Bonner, J., 1949. “Further experiments on flowering in Xanthium”, Bot. Gaz., 110, 625627.Google Scholar
Galston, A. W., 1947. “The effect of 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid on the growth and flowering of soybeans”, Amer.J. Bot., 34, 356360.Google Scholar
Gorter, C. J., 1949. “The influence of 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid on the growing points of tomatoes”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 52, 11851193.Google Scholar
Gorter, C. J., 1951. “The influence of 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid on the growing points of tomatoes. II. The initiation of ring-fasciations”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 54, 181190.Google Scholar
Gorter, C. J., 1954. “The flowering response of Phaseolus vulgaris to 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid and its Cl- and Br- analogues”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 57, 606616.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J., 1956. “Auxin and sexuality in Cannabis sativa”, Physiol. Plant., 9, 588597.Google Scholar
Kraus, E. J., and Mitchell, J. W., 1947. “Growth regulating substances as herbicides”, Bot. Gaz., 108, 301350.Google Scholar
Laibach, F., and Kribben, F. J., 1950 a. “Der Einfluss von Wuchstoff auf die Bildung männlicher und weiblicher Blüten bei einer monözischen Pflanze (Cucumis sativa L.)”, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges., 62, 5355.Google Scholar
Laibach, F., and Kribben, F. J., 1950 b. “Der Einfluss von Wuchstoff auf das Geschlecht der Blüten bei einer monözischen Pflanze”, Beitr. Biol. Pfl., 28, 6467.Google Scholar
Lang, A., 1952. “Physiology of flowering”, Annu. Rev. PI. Physiol., 3, 265306.Google Scholar
Niedergang-Kamien, E., 1955. “Chemical alteration of auxin transport”, Plant Physiol., 30, suppl., v.Google Scholar
Niedergang-Kamien, E., and Skoog, F., 1956. “Studies on polarity and auxin transport in plants. I. Modification of polarity and auxin transport by triiodobenzoic acid”, Physiol. Plant., 9, 6073.Google Scholar
Nitsch, J. P., Kurtz, E. B., Liverman, J. L., and Went, F. W., 1952. “The development of sex expression in Cucurbit flowers“, Amer.J. Bot., 39, 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, R. C, and Wain, R. L., 1955. “Studies on plant growth-regulating substances. IX. Investigations with pollen extracts and synthetic growth substances on the hop plant (Humulus Lupulus L.)”, Ann. Appl. Biol., 43, 355365.Google Scholar
De Waard, J., and Roodenburg, J. W. M., 1948. “Premature flower-bud initiation in tomato seedlings caused by 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 51, 249251.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, C. W., 1953. “Action of triiodobenzoic and trichlorobenzoic acids in morphogenesis”, New PhytoL, 52, 210217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, A. G., and Murray, M. A., 1948. “Abscission and other responses induced by 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid in bean plants”, Bot. Gaz., 109, 447473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittwer, S. H., and Hillyer, I. G., 1954. “Chemical induction of male sterility”, Science, 120, 893.Google Scholar
Van Zeist, W., and Koevoets, T. C. M., 1951. “Kalanchoe blossfeldiana treated with 2, 3, 5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA)”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., 54, 38.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, P. W., and Hitchcock, A. E., 1942. “Flowering habit and correlation of organs modified by triiodobenzoic acid”, Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst., 12, 491496.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, P. W., and Hitchcock, A. E., 1949 a.Triiodobenzoic acid influences flower formation of tomatoes”, Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst., 15, 353361.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, P. W., and Hitchcock, A. E., 1949 b.Formative effects of several substituted phenoxy acids applied to Kalanchoë”, Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst., 15, 421428.Google Scholar