Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:15:03.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partial validation of a numerical model for tidal motion in the Tay Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

D. J. Gunn
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University College of Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, U.K.
J. McManus
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, U.K.
O. Yenigun
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access

Synopsis

In a mathematical model of the Tay (Gunn & Yenigun 1987) based upon the Local Integral Method (Gunn & Yenigun 1985), tidal levels at the seaward boundaries and velocities at landward boundaries are used in setting boundary conditions, so that validation studies are mainly based upon changes in internal tidal levels, and comparison between computed and measured velocities within the modelled region. The comparisons of tidal levels within this estuary over a 5.0 m tide showed agreement with overall values from Buddon Ness to the rail bridge, but within the overall agreement there were significant differences in the immediate vicinity of the road bridge. Velocities predicted within the estuary have been compared with measurements provided by a number of surveys in the period from 1972-78. The agreement between experiment and prediction was good in the central and western regions of the model, but the comparison between measurement and prediction was less good near the eastern boundaries. The principal reason for poorer agreement in the east was the difficulty in setting boundary conditions at the open sea extremes of the model. The most satisfactory way of improving the model near the open sea boundaries would be to link the model for the Tay with a model for velocity and level in the North Sea.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buller, A. T., Charlton, J. A. & McManus, J. 1972. Data from physical and chemical measurements in the Tay estuary for neap and spring tides, June 1972. Tay Estuary Research Centre Report 2. Dundee: University of Dundee.Google Scholar
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open Channel Hydraulics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Charlton, J. A. 1980. The tidal circulation and flushing capability of the outer Tay Estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 78B, 3346.Google Scholar
Charlton, J. A., McNicoll, W. & West, J. R. 1975. Tidal and freshwater induced circulation in the Tay Estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 75B, 1127.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. 1974. Sedimentary and morphological dynamics between St Andrews Bay and Tayport, Tay Estuary, Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dundee.Google Scholar
Gunn, D. J. & Yenigun, O. 1985. Modelling of tidal motion in shoaling waters: The Estuary of Milford Haven. Esluarine & Shelf Science 21, 337356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D. J. & Yenigun, O. 1987. A model for tidal motion and level in the Tay Estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 92B, 257273.Google Scholar
McManus, J. 1984. Data from tidal cycle measurement stations on the Tay Estuary 1972–82. Dundee: University of Dundee, Tay Estuary Research Centre.Google Scholar
Prandle, D. 1978. Residual flows and elevations in the North Sea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A359, 189228.Google Scholar