Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:10:28.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IX.—Uromyces punctatus Schroet. in Britain*†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

D. W. Burns
D. W. Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The University, Aberdeen
Get access

Synopsis

On the European continent, Uromyces punctatus is heterœcious and occurs on 35 species and 1 variety of Astragalus, 6 species of Oxytropis and 1 species of Onobrychis. There are 3 æcidial hosts recorded, the major one being Euphorbia cyparissias. At St Andrews, the uredo stage of the rust is confined to A. danicus and only uredospores and teleutospores have been found. Experiments conducted showed that the local population of the rust was capable of infecting 9 species of Astragalus and 1 species of Medicago, out of 27 species of Astragalus, 5 species of Medicago and 28 species of other legumes inoculated. No host specialization within the local population was evident. Attempts to germinate the teleutospores, using a variety of methods, failed, with the exception of a single spore. The major æcidial host, when inoculated with teleutospores, failed to show any signs of æcidial infection over a period of four years. Possible factors affecting the shortening of the life cycle of the rust are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , 1956 , pp. 212 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

†

This study was carried out in the Department of Botany, United College, University of St Andrews, under the supervision of Dr J. A. Macdonald.

References

References to Literature

Arthur, J. C., 1929. The Plant Rusts. New York.Google Scholar
Brown, W., 1922. “Studies in the physiology of parasitism: IX”. Ann. Bot. Lond., 36, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubàk, F R., 1904. “Infektionversuche mit einige Uredineen”, Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, 12, 411–426.Google Scholar
Burns, D. W., 1954. A Study on the Uromyces pisi Group of Rust Fungi. Ph.D. Thesis, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G., and Warburg, E. F., 1952. Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cotter, R. U., 1940. “Unseasonable germination of teleutospores of Puccinia graminis tritici”, Phytopathology, 30, 689.Google Scholar
Duggar, B. M., 1901. “Physiological studies with reference to the germination of certain fungus spores”, Bot. Gaz., 31, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Mary R. 1948. “Chemical activation of ascospore germination in Neurospora crassa”, J. Bad., 55, 327–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Fischer, E., 1904. Die Uredineen der Schweiz, 2 (2), 1–591.Google Scholar
Guyot, A. L., 1938. Uredineana, 1, 122.Google Scholar
Johansen, C. I., 1886. “Uber die den Hockgerbergen Jantlands”, Bot. Zbl., 28, 347, 377.Google Scholar
Jordi, E., 1903. “Kulturversuche mit Papilionacean bewohnenden Rostpilze”, Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, 10, 777–779. Also “Beiträge zur Kentiss der Papilionacean bewohnenden Uromyces Arten”, Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, 11, 763.Google Scholar
Jordi, E., 1904. “Weitere Untersuchungen über Uromyces pisi (Pers.)”. Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, 13, 64–72.Google Scholar
Jørstad, I., 1948. “Erterust, Uromyces pisi (D.C.) Fuck. I Norge”, Nordisk. Jordbr Forskn., 7–8.Google Scholar
Lamb, I. M., 1943. “On the morphology and cytology of Puccinia prostii Moug.”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 58, 230.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1949. Handlist of the Rust Fungi of St Andrews District. St Andrews.Google Scholar
Magnus, P., 1893. “Ueber die auf Compositien auftretenden Puccinien mit Teleutosporen”, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges., 11, 453–464.Google Scholar
Mueller, W., 1907. “Versuchemit Uredineen”, Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 2, 17, 210–211.Google Scholar
Noble, R. J., 1923. “Studies on Urocystis tritici Koern.”, Phytopathology, 13, 127.Google Scholar
Noble, R. J., 1924. “Studies on the parasitism of Urocystis tritici Koern.”, J. Agric. Res., 27, 451.Google Scholar
Opiz, P. M., 1852. In Seznam Rostlin, p. 151.Google Scholar
Schroeter, J., 1869. “Die Brand- und Rostpilze Schlesiens”, Abh. Schl.-holst. Ges. Vaterl. Cult., 1–31. Also 1871, Hedwigia, 10, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeter, J., 1875. “Über einige Amerikanische Uredineen”, Hedwigia, 14, 161–172.Google Scholar
Sydow, P. et H., 1904–1912. Monographia Uredinearum, 2, 1–396.Google Scholar
Thiel, A. F., and Weiss, F., 1920. “The effect of citric acid on the germination of the teliospores of Puccinia graminis tritici”, Phytopathology, 10, 448–452.Google Scholar
Treboux, O., 1912. “Infektionversuche mit parasitischen Pilze I”, Ann. Mycol. Berl., 10, 73–76 and 557–563.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., 1948. “The occurrence in the Uredinales of species with unstable life histories”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, 63, 177–187.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., and Bisby, G. R., 1954. “List of British Uredinales”, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc, 37, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, G., 1880. “Mykologisches aus Graubünden”, Hedwigia, 19, 159–167.Google Scholar
Young, W., 1936. “Flowering plants of Fife and Kinross”, Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., 32, 3–173.Google Scholar