Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:42:29.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The in vivo Action of Anti-lymphocytic Antibody

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

A. M. Denman  and
Evelyn J. Denman
A. M. Denman
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Rheumatism Unit, Canadian Red Cross Hospital, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire
Evelyn J. Denman
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Rheumatism Unit, Canadian Red Cross Hospital, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire
Get access

Extract

It Is the general object of this paper to consider which of the many actions of anti-lymphocytic antibody contribute to its immunosuppressive action. However, it will be principally concerned with the kinetics of lymphopoiesis in mice receiving anti-lymphocytic antibody and the relevance of this activity to the resulting immunosuppression.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , 1969 , pp. 317 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Borsook, H., Pratner, K., and Tattrie, B., 1969. Nature, Lond., 221, 1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craddock, C. G., Nakai, S. G., Fukata, H., and Vanslager, L. M., 1964. J. Exp. Med., 120, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meester, T. R., Anderson, N. D., and Shaffer, C. F., 1968. J. Exp. Med., 127, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denman, A. M., Denman, Evelyn J., and Embling, P. H., 1968 a. Lancet, 1, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denman, A. M., Denman, Evelyn J., and Holborow, E. J., 1968 b. Nature, Lond., 217, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denman, A. M., and Frenkel, E. P., 1968. Immunology, 14, 107 and 115.Google Scholar
Dupuy, J.-M., Perey, D. Y. E., and Good, R. A., 1969. Lancet, 1, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, N. B., Caffrey, R. W., and Rieke, W. O., 1964. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 113, 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, N. B., and Tyler, R. W., 1967. Intern. Rev. Cytol., 22, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, E. J., and Hughes, D., 1969. Lancet, 1, 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, E. P., Sugino, Y., Bishop, R. L., and Potter, R. L., 1963. Radiat. Res., 19, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowans, J. L., 1959. J. Physiol., Lond., 146, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K., 1967. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 6, 215.Google Scholar
Jeejeebhoy, H. F., 1965. Immunology, 9, 417.Google Scholar
Leuchars, E., Wallis, V. J., and Davies, A. J. S., 1968. Nature, Lond., 219, 1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, R. H., and Medawar, P. B., 1967. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 58, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewi, G., Temple, Anne, Nind, A. P. P., and Axelrad, M., 1969. Immunology, 16, 99.Google Scholar
Martin, W. J., and Miller, J. F. A. P., 1968. J. Exp. Med., 128, 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. I., and Riester, S. K., 1967. J. Exp. Med., 125, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, G., and Zukoski, C, 1968. J. Immunol., 101, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigeno, N., Hämmerling, U., Arpels, G., Boyse, E. A., and Old, L. J., 1968. Lancet, 1, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trowell, O. A., 1961. Int. J Radiat. Biol., 4, 163.Google Scholar