Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:48:49.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—The Hydroid Collections of James Ritchie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

William J. Rees  and
Sarah Thursfield
Get access

Synopsis

The introduction contains an appreciation of the work of James Ritchie (1882–1958) on hydroids. His collections in the Royal Scottish Museum consisting of 266 species have been re-examined and listed with up-to-date synonymy, this also serving as a catalogue of all the identified hydroid material in this Museum.

Among the important collections are those made by W. S. Bruce in the Scotia and E. H. Shackleton's Antarctic Expeditions; there is also much valuable secondary material, especially in the form of micro-preparations, from collections reported on by Ritchie, notably those of the Australian Thetis Expedition, the Scottish Loch collections of Sir John Murray, the Indian Museum and collections by Cyril Crossland, James Simpson and Rudmose Brown and others.

Ritchie described many new species and varieties and all the type material has been noted, lectotypes being designated where necessary.

Hydroids from the Goldseeker collections of the Fishery Board for Scotland were not reported on by Ritchie although he identified a considerable number of samples from Scottish waters—these have been included in this survey. These new records are of considerable value for compiling distribution lists. Apart from Ritchie's own work little has been done on hydroids from waters around the north of Scotland since the days of Hincks, Allman and Norman. The bibliography contains a full list of James Ritchie's hydroid papers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 69 , Issue 1-2 , 1965 , pp. 34 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Agassiz, A., 1865. “Illustrated Catalogue of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College”, No. 2. North American Acalephœ; 1–234, 360 text-figs.Google Scholar
Agassiz, J. L. R., 1862. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America, 4, 1–380, Pls. 20–34.Google Scholar
Alder, J., 1856. “Descriptions of Three new British Zoophytes”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 18, 439–441, Pl. 16.Google Scholar
Alder, J., 1857. “A Catalogue of the Zoophytes of Northumberland and Durham”, Trans. Tyneside Nat. Fid. Club, 3, 93–162, Pls. 3–10.Google Scholar
Alder, J., 1859. “Descriptions of Three New Species of Sertularian Zoophytes”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3, 353–356 Pls. 12–14.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1859. “Notes on the Hydroid Zoophytes”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 4, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1864 a. “On the Construction and Limitation of the Genera among the Hydroida”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 13, 345–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1864 b. “Notes on the Hydroida”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 14, 57–64, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1871–1872. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids. London, xxiv and 450 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1874. “Report on the Hydroida collected during the Expeditions of H.M.S. Porcupine”, Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 8, 469–481, Pls. 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1876. “Diagnoses of New Genera and Species of Hydroida”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 12, 251–284, Pls. 9–23.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1877. “Report on the Hydroida collected during the Exploration of the Gulf Stream”, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., 5, 1–66, Pls. 1–34.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1883. “Report on the Hydroida dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, Pt. 1, Plumulariidæ” Rep. Sci. Res. Voy. ‘Challenger’ Zool., 7, 1–55, Pls. 1–20.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1885. “Description of Australian, Cape and other Hydroida, mostly new, from the Collection of Miss H. Gatty”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool), 19, 132–161, Pls. 7–26.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1888. “Report on the Hydroida dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76, Pt. 2”, Rep. Sci. Res. Voy. ‘Challenger’ Zool., 23, lxix and 90 pp., Pls. 1–39.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. H. and Ritchie, J., 1915. “The Morphology and Development of the Free-swimming Sporosacs of the Hydroid Genus Dicoryne (including Heteroeordyle)”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 51, 257–285, Pl. 6–8 and 3 text-figs.Google Scholar
Babic, K., 1912. “Dimophismus der Gonangien bei Laomedea angulata Hincks”, Zool. Anz., 39, 457–460, 5 text-figs.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1882. “On the Hydroida of S.E. Australia, with Descriptions of supposed New Species and Notes on the Genus Aglaophenia”, J. Micr. Soc. Vict., 2, 15–48, Pls. 12–15.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1884. Catalogue of the Australian Hydroid Zoophytes, Sydney. 198 pp., Pls. 1–19.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1888. “On some New and Rare Hydroida in the Australian Museum Collection”, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 3, 745–749, Pls. 12–21.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1894. “Further Notes on Australian Hydroids, with Descriptions of some New Species”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., 6, 93–117, Pls. 3–6.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1913. “Further Notes on Australian Hydroids, 2”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. 26, 114–147, Pls. 12–13.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1914 a. “Report on the Hydroida collected in the Great Australian Bight and other localities”, Zool. Res. Fish. Exp. ‘Endeavour’, 2, 3–62, 166–188, Pls. 1–7, 35–38.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1914 b. “Further Notes on Australian Hydroids, 3”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., 27, 72–93, Pls. 11–13.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1915. “Report on the Hydroida collected in the Great Australian Bight and other localities, Pt. 3”, Zool. Res. Fish. Exp. ‘Endeavour’, 3, 241–336, Pls. 46–47.Google Scholar
Bale, W. M., 1924. “Reports on some Hydroids from the New Zealand coast, with Notes on New Zealand Hydroida generally, supplementing Farquhar's list”, Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst., 55, 225–268, 18 text-figs.Google Scholar
Bedot, M., 1916. “Materiaux pour servir à l'Histoire des Hydroides 5e Periode. (1881–1890)”, Rev. Suisse Zool., 24, 1–349.Google Scholar
Bedot, M., 1917. “Le genre Nemertesia”, Mém. Soc. Phys. Genève, 39, 15–52.Google Scholar
Bedot, M., 1921 a. “Notes systématiques sur les Plumularides”, Rev. Suisse Zool., 28, 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedot, M., 1921 b. “Notes systématiques sur les Plumularides”, Rev. Suisse Zool., 29, 1–40.Google Scholar
Bedot, M., 1925. “Matériaux pour servir à l'Histoire des Hydroides. 7e. periode (1901–1910)”, Rev. Suisse Zool., 32, Supp., 1–657.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1906. “Hydroides”, Exped. Sci. Travaill. Talisman, 1906, 153–243, text-figs.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1907 a. “Hydroides de la collection Lamarck du Museum de Paris, 1. Plumulariidæ”, Ann. Sci. Nat. (Zool.), 5, 319–335, 5 text-figs.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1907 b. “Hydroides de Madagascar et du sud-est de l'Afrique”, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 7, 335–396, Pls. 25–26.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1909 a. “Sur quelques Plumulariidæ de la collection du British Museum. (Note préliminaire)”, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 148, 367–369.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1909 b. “Sur les Hydroides de la collection Lamouroux. (Note préliminaire)”, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 148, 1063–1065.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1910. “Revision d'une partie des Hydroides de la collection du British Museum”, Ann. Sci. Nat. (Zool.), 11, 1–67 pp., 24 figs.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1912. “Hydroides de Roscoff”, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., 51, 459–478, 8 text-figs.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1913. “Les Hydroides de l'Expédition du Siboga. 1, Plumulariidæ”, Siboga Exped., 7a, 1–114, Pl. 1–6, 96 text-figs.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1925. “Les Hydroides de l'Expédition du Siboga. 2, Synthecidæ et Sertularidæ”, Siboga Exped., 7b, 117–232, 58 text-figs and Pl. 1–9.Google Scholar
Billard, A., 1941. “Note sur les Hydroides, Hebella costata (Bale) et Hebella corrugata (Thornely)”, Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr., 66, 13–15, text-figs.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M., 1942. “A systematic list of the Hydroida of South Australia with a Summary of their Distribution in Other Seas”, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aus., 66, 104–118.Google Scholar
Bonnevie, Kristine, 1899. “Hydroida”, Norske Nordhavs-Exped., 1876–1878, 26, Zool. 104 pp.Google Scholar
Boulenger, C. L., 1908. “On Mœrisia lyonsi, a new Hydromedusan from Lake Qurun”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 52, 357–378, Pl. 22–23.Google Scholar
Briggs, E. A., 1914. “Hydrozoa from One Hundred Fathoms, seven miles east of Cape Pillar, Tasmania”, Rec. Aust. Mus., 10, 285–302, Pl. 25–26 and text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
Briggs, E. A., 1915. “Hydroids from N.S. Wales”, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W., 40, 196–202, Pl. 30–31, text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
Briggs, E. A., 1918. “Description of two new Hydroids, and a Revision of the Hydroid Fauna of Lord Howe Island”, Rec. Aust. Mus., 12, 27–47, Pl. 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, E. A. and Gardiner, V. E., 1931. “Hydroida”, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped., 4, 181–196, Pl. 1, text-figs. 1–6.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1903. “Die von dem norwegischen Fischereidampfer ‘Michæl Sars’ in den Jahren 1900–1902 in dem Nordmeer gesammelten Hydroiden”, Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1903, 1–14, 1 map, Pl. 1–4.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1909. “Die Hydroiden der Arktischen Meere”, Fauna Arct. Jena, 5, 127–248, Pl. 2–4.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1913. “Hydroida”, Rep. Sars N. Atl. Deep Sea Exped., 3, 3–18, text-figs. 1–14.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1916. “Hydroida, Pt. 1”, Dan. Ingolf-Exped., 5, 1–66, Pl. 1–2.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1918. “Hydroida, Pt. 2”, Dan. Ingolf-Exped., 5, 1–205, text-figs. 1–95, Pl. 1.Google Scholar
Broch, Hj., 1933. “Zur Kenntnis der Adriatischen Hydroiden fauna von Split”, Skr. Norske VidenskAkad., 1933, 1–115, 46 text-figs.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1902. “A Preliminary Report on Hydromedusæ from the Falkland Islands”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 9, 272–284.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1905. “Report on the Medusæ (Hydromedusæ, Scyphomedusæ and Ctenophora) collected by Professor Herdman at Ceylon in 1902”, Rep. Pearl Fish. Manaar, IV., Suppl. Rep. 27, 132–166, Pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T. and Kramp, P. L., 1939. “Hydromedusæ from the Falkland Islands”, ‘Discovery’ Rep., 18, 265–322, Pl. 14–19, text-figs. 1–12.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B., 1957. “The Hydroid Fauna of the Gold Coast”, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 56, 349–372, text-figs. 1–23.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1851. “A List of Sertularian Zoophytes and Polyzoa from Port Natal, Algoa Bay, and Table Bay, in South Africa, with Remarks on their Geographical Distribution and Observations on the Genera Plumularia and Catenicella”, Rep. Brit. Ass., 1850, 118–120.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1852. “An Account of the Polyzoa and Sertularian Zoophytes collected in the Voyage of the ‘Rattlesnake’ on the Coast of Australia and the Louisiade Archipelago”, In MacGillivray, J., Narrative Voy. ‘Rattlesnake’, I, App. IV., 343–402, Pl. 1.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1858. “Zoophytology”, Quart. J. Micr. Set., 6, 124–130, Pls. 18–19.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. F., 1876. “Report on the Hydroids collected on the Coast of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, by W. H. Dall, U.S. Coast Survey, and Party from 1871–1874 inclusive”, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., 1876, 209–238, Pl. 7–16.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. F., 1879. “Report on the Hydroida collected during the Exploration of the Gulf of Mexico, by Alexander Agassiz, 1877–1878”, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., 5, 239–252, Pls. 1–5.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. F., 1882. “New and Interesting Hydroids from Chesapeake Bay”, Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 3, 135–142, Pl. 7–9.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. F., 1907. “The Hydroids”, In Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific in charge of A. Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer “Albatross” from October 1904 to March 1905”, viii., Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., 35, 1–18, Pls. 1–15.Google Scholar
Cotton, B. C. and Godfrey, F. K., 1942. Idiellana, a new name for the Preoccupied Genus Idiella Stechow. (Coelenterata—Family Sertulariidæ)”, Rec. S. Aust. Mus., 7, 234.Google Scholar
Coughtrey, M., 1875. “Notes on the New Zealand Hydroida”, Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst., 7, 281–293, Pl. 20.Google Scholar
Crawshay, L. R., 1912. “On the Fauna of the Outer Western Area of the English Channel”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 9, 292–393, 1 Pl., 3 text-figs.Google Scholar
Dons, C., 1912. “Hydroid, Bemerkungen. 1. Rhizogeton nudus Broch und Halecium curvicaule Lorenz neu fur die Fauna Norwegens”, Tromsö Mus. Aarsh., 34, 51–70, text-figs. 1–7.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W., 1881. “Report on the Acalephæ. In Reports on the Results of Dredging under the Supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Caribbean Sea in 1878, 1879, and along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, during the Summer of 1880, by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer Blake”, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., 8, 127–140, Pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Fleming, J., 1828. A History of British Animals. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Forbes, E., 1848. A Monograph of the British Naked-eyed Medusœ: with figures of all the Species, 104 pp., Pls. 1–13, Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
Fraser, C. Mcl., 1912. “Some Hydroids of Beaufort, North Carolina”, Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., 30, 337–387.Google Scholar
Fraser, C. Mcl., 1944. Hydroids of the Atlantic Coast of North America, 1–451, Pls. 1–94. (Univ. Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F., 1921. “The Life-history of Melicertidium octocostatum (Sars), a Leptomedusan with a Theca-less Hydroid stage”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 65, 339–347, Pl. 16.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E., 1843. In “Dieffenbach's ‘Travels in New Zealand’”, 2, 292.Google Scholar
Hadži, J., 1914. “Vergleichende Hydroidenuntersuchungen, 2”, Bull. Int. Acad. Yougosl., 202, 77–81.Google Scholar
Hæckel, E., 1879. “Das System der Medusen. Erster Theil einer Monographie der Medusen”, Denkschr. Med.-Naturw. Ges. Jena, 1879, 1–360, atlas Pls. 1–40.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A., Drinnan, R. E., and Harris, W. N., 1956. “Notes on the Biology of Sertularia argentea L.”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 35, 317–325, 5 text-figs.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1897. “Die Hydromedusen Helgolands”, Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., 2, 449–512, Taf. 14–23.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1900. “Revision der Sertularella-Arten.”, Abh. Naturw. Hamburg, 16, 1–143, Pls. 1–6, text-figs. 1–56.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1901. “Hydroiden aus dem Stillen Ocean. Ergebnisse einer Reise nach den Pacific”, Zool. Jb. (Syst.), 14, 349–379, Pls. 21–22.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1904. “Hydroiden”, Exped. Antarct. Fr. Belgica, 1–19, Pl. 1–4.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1905. “Die Hydroiden der magalhæensischen Region und chilenischen Küste”, Zool. Jb. Suppl., 6, 497–714.Google Scholar
Hassal, F. and Coppin, J., 1852. “Descriptions of Three Species of Marine Zoophytes”, Trans. Micr. Soc., 3, 160–163, Pl. 21.Google Scholar
Hickson, S. J. and Gravely, F. H., 1907. “Cœlenterata. 2, Hydroid Zoophytes”, Nat. Antarct. Exped. Nat. Hist., 3, 1–34, Pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1853. “Further Notes on British Zoophytes, with Descriptions of New Species”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 11, 178–185, Pls. 5–6.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1861. “A Catalogue of the Zoophytes of South Devon and South Cornwall”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 8, 152–161, 251–262, 290–297, Pls. 6–8.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1866. “On New British Hydroida”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 18, 296–299.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868. A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes. London. 2 vols. i–lxviii, 1–338, 45 woodcuts, and Pl. 1–67.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1871. “Supplement to a Catalogue of the Zoophytes of South Devon and South Cornwall”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 8, 73–83, Pls. 5–6.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1874. “On Deep-water Hydroida from Iceland”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 13, 146–153, Pls. 6–8.Google Scholar
Huvé, P., 1952. “Revision des Polypes campanulinides méditerranéans,” Rec. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume, 4, 34–52.Google Scholar
Huvé, P., 1953. “Biologie de l'hydraire Hypsorophus quadratus (Forbes) 1848 en Mediterranée occidentale”, Bull. Inst. Octanogr. Monaco, 1019, 1–11.Google Scholar
Huvé, P., 1954. “Hydranthea et Campalecium genres méditerranéens aberrants d'hydroides de la famille des Haleciides”, Rec. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume, 13, 173–192, Pl. 1–9.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1896. “Ueber aussereuropäische Hydroiden des Zoologischen Museums der Universitat Upsala”, Bih. Svensk. VetenskAkad. Handl., (Afd. IV.), 21, 1–20, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1904 a. “Aussereuropäische Hydroiden im Schwedischen Reichsmuseum”, Ark. Zool., 1, 259–312, Pls. 12–15.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1904 b. “Mitteilungen ueber einige von der Schwedischen Antarctic-expedition 1901–1903 eingersammelte Hydroiden”, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. (N. & R.), 3, i–xiv.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1905. “Hydroiden aus Antarktischen und subantarktischen Meeren gesammelt von der schwedischen Südpolar expedition”, Wiss. Ergebn. Schwed. Sildpolarexped., 5, 1–41, text-figs. 1–14.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1909. “Northern and Arctic Invertebrates in the Collection of the Swedish State Museum (Riksmuseum). 4. Hydroiden”, K. Svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., 45, 124 pp.Google Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1919. “Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna Japans”, Ark. Zool., 12, 1–34, Pls. 1–64.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G. and Norman, A. M., 1875. “Submarine-Cable Fauna,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 15, 169–176, Pl. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, G., 1847. A History of the British Zoophytes. 2 vols. 2nd Edn. 1–488, text-figs. 1–87, and Pls. 1–74.Google Scholar
Kirchenpauer, G. H., 1872. “Ueber die Hydroidenfamilie Plumularidæ einzelne gruppen derselten und ihre Fruchtbehälter. i. Aglaophenia” Lx. Abh. Naturw. Hamburg, 5, 1–52, Pls. 1–8.Google Scholar
Kirchenpauer, G. H., 1876. “Ueber die Hydroidenfamilie Plumularidæ, einzelne gruppen derselten und ihre Fruchtbehälter. 2. Plumularia und Nemertesia”, Abh. Naturw. Hamburg, 6, 1–59, Pls. 1–8.Google Scholar
Kirchenpauer, G. H., 1884. “Nordische Gattungen und Arten von Sertulariden”, Abh. Naturw. Hamburg, 8, 1–54, Pls. 11–16.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R., 1890. “Reports on the Zoological Collections made in Torres Straits by Professor A. C. Haddon. Hydroida and Polyzoa”, Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., 6, 603–626, Pls. 14–17.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R., 1910. “Hydrozoa and Porifera”, In Cunningham, “On the Marine Fishes and Invertebrates of St Helena”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1910, 86–131, Pls. 4–7.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1932. “The Godthaab Expedition 1928. Hydroids”, Medd. Grönland, 79, 1–86, text-figs. 1–34.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1935 a. “Corydendrium dispar, a New Athecate Hydroid from Scandinavian Seas, with Remarks on Classification”, Göteborgs VetenskSamh. Handl., 134, 3–15, Pl. 1, text-figs. 1-4.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1935 b. “Polypdyr (Coelenterata). 1. Ferskvandspolypper og Goplepolypper”, Danm. Fauna, 41, 208 pp., text-figs. 1–81.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1938. “Marine Hydrozoa. Hydroida”, Zool. Iceland, 2, 1–82, text-figs.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1953. “Hydromedusæ”, Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped., 6, 259–322, Pl. 1, text-figs. 1–2.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1958. “Hydromedusæ in the Indian Museum”, Rec. Indian Mus., 53, 339–376.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J., 1816. “Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres”, 2.Google Scholar
Lamouroux, J. V. F., 1816. “Histoire des Polypiers coralligènes flexibles vulgairement nommés Zoophytes”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, E., 1963. “The Hydroid Leuckartiara octona (Fleming) and its association with the Polychaete Aphrodite aculeata (L.)”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5, 523–528, 1 Pl. and 1 text-fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leloup, E., 1930. “Résults scientifique du Voyage Orientale Néerlandaises. Cœlentéres Hydropolypes”, Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. Belg., 2, 1–18, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1932. “Une collection d'Hydropolypes appartenant l'Indian Museum de Calcutta”, Rec. Indian Mus., 34, 131–170, Pls. xvi–xvii, and 28 text-figs.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1934. “Contributions à l'étude de la faune beige. 5. Les hydropolypes épizoiques du ver polychète, Aphrodite aculeata (Linné)”, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Belg., 10, 1–6.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1935 “Hydraires calyptoblastiques des Indes occidentals”, Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. Belg., 2, 1–73, text-figs. 1–32.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1937. “Hydropolypes et scyphopolypes recueillis par C. Dawydoff sur les Côtes de l'Indochine française”, Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. Belg., 12, 3–73, text-figs. 1–43.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. v., 1885. “The Australian Hydromedusæ, Pt. V. The Hydromedusæ, Hydrocorallinse and Trachymedusæ”, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 9, 581–634, Pls. 20–29.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G. M. R., 1893. “Meduser, Ctenophorer og Hydroider fra Gronlands Vestkyst, tilligemed Bemaerkninger om Hydroidernes Systematik”, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturh. Foren. Kbh., 4, 143–212, Pls. 5–8.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G. M. R., 1913. “Systematic Studies on the Sertulariidæ”, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk. Natur. Foren. Kbh., 64, 249–323, Pls. 4–5.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Natures. Edn. 10. Pp. 1–824. Zoophyta 799–821.Google Scholar
McCrady, J., 1857. “Gymnophthalmata of Charleston Harbor”, Proc. Elliot Soc. Nat. Hist., 1, 103–221, Pls. 8–12.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, J., 1842. “Catalogue of the Marine Zoophytes of the Neighbourhood of Aberdeen”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 9, 462–469.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1940. “On Two New Species of the Hydroid Myriothela”, Sci. Rep. Brit. Grahamld Exped., 1, 255–294, Pls. 1–4 and 9 text-figs.Google Scholar
Marktanner-Turneretscher, G., 1890. “Die Hydroiden des k.k. naturhistorischen Hofmuseums”, Ann. Naturh. (Mus.) Hofmus., Wien, 5, 195–286, Pls. 3–7.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. G., 1910. “Medusæ of the World”, Publ. Carneg. Instn., 109, 1–735, Pls. 1–76.Google Scholar
Mendes, M. V., 1946. “Hydroida thecaphora do Brazil”, Arch. Zool. S. Paulo”, 4, 535–597, Pls. 1–7.Google Scholar
Mereschkowsky, M. C., 1877. “On a New Genus of Hydroids from the White Sea, with a short description of Other New Hydroids”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 20, 220–229.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1957. “The Hydrozoa of False Bay, South Africa”, Ann. S.Afr. Mus., 43, 173–243, 15 text-figs.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1958. “Hydrozoa from the Coasts of Natal and Portuguese East Africa. Pt. 1. Calyptoblastea”, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 44, 165–226, 16 text-figs.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1959. “Hydrozoa from the Coasts of Natal and Portuguese East Africa. Pt. 2. Gymnoblastea”, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 44, 297–313, 4 text-figs.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1961. “A Report on Busk's Collection of South African Hydroids”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 4, 203–208.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1962. “The Hydrozoa of the South and West Coasts of South Africa. Pt. I. The Plumulariidæ”, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 46, 261–319, 12 text-figs.Google Scholar
Millard, N. A. H., 1964. “The Hydrozoa of the South and West Coasts of South Africa. Pt. II. The Lafoeidæ, Syntheciidæ and Sertulariidæ”, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 48, 1–56, 16 text-figs.Google Scholar
Motz-Kossowska, S., 1911. “Contributions à la connaissance des Hydraires de la Méditerranée occidentale. Hydraires calyptoblastiques”, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen., 6, 325–352.Google Scholar
Naumov, D. V., 1960. “Hydroids and Hydromedusæ of Marine, Brackish and Freshwater Basins of the U.S.S.R.”, Tabl. Anal. Faune U.R.S.S., 70, 1–585, Pls. 1–30, text-figs. 1–463.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1878. “Notes on Selaginopsis (=Polyserias Hincksii, Mereschkowsky), and on the Circumpolar Distribution of Certain Hydrozoa”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1, 189–192.Google Scholar
Nutting, C. C., 1900. “American Hydroids. Pt. 1. The Plumulariidæ”, Spec. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1–135, Pls. 1–34.Google Scholar
Nutting, C. C., 1904. “American Hydroids. Pt. 2. The Sertularidæ”, Spec. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1–151, Pls. 1–41.Google Scholar
Nutting, C. C., 1906. “Hydroids of the Hawaiian Islands”, Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., 23, 931–959, Pls. 1–13.Google Scholar
Nutting, C. C., 1927. “Report on the Hydroida collected by the United States Fisheries Steamer ‘Albatross’ in the Philippine region 1907–1910”, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 100, 195–242, Pls.Google Scholar
Paspaleff, G. W., 1938. “Uber die Polypen und Medusenform von Ostroumovia inkermanika (Pal. Ostr.). 1. Einleitung. 2. Die Polypen Ostroumovia inkermanica (Pal. Ostr.)”, Arb. Biol. Meeresst. Varna, 7, 27–44.Google Scholar
Pennington, A. S., 1885. British Zoophytes: An Introduction to the Hydroida, Actinozoa and Polyzoa found in Great Britain, Ireland and the Channel Islands. London.Google Scholar
Pennycuik, P. R., 1959. “Faunistic Records from Queensland. Pt. 5. Marine and Brackish Water Hydroids”, Pap. Dep. Zool. Univ. Qd, 1, 141–210, Pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Philbert, M., 1936. “Études sur Cladocoryne floccosa”, Bull. Inst. Océanogr. Monaco, 708, 1–16, text-figs. 1–8.Google Scholar
Picard, J., 1951. “Contribution à l'étude des méduses de la famille des Mœrisiidæ”, Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, 944, 1–16.Google Scholar
Picard, J., 1952. “Nouvelle contribution à l'étude des Moerisiidæ (Hydroida)”, Rec. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume, 4, 53–56.Google Scholar
Picard, J., 1957. “Etudes sur les Hydroides de la Superfamille Pteronematoidea. 1. Géné'ralités”, Bull. Inst. Océanogr. Monaco, 1106, 3–12.Google Scholar
Pictet, C., 1893. “Etude sur les Hydraires de la Baie d'Amboine”, Rev. Suisse Zool., 1, 1–64, Pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. M., 1957. “New Zealand Thecate Hydroids. Pt. 1. Campanulariidæ and Campanulinidæ”, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 84, 811–854, text-figs. 1–8.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. M., 1958. “New Zealand Thecate Hydroids. Pt. 2. Families Lafoeidæ Lineolariidæ, Haleciidæ and Syntheciidæ”, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 85, 301–356, text-figs. 1–18.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. M., 1961 a. “New Zealand Thecate Hydroids. Pt. 3. Family Sertulariidæ” Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 88, 749–838, text-figs. 1–25.Google Scholar
Ralph, P. M., 1961 b. “New Zealand Thecate Hydroids. Pt. 4. Family Plumulariidæ”, Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z. (Zool.), 1, 19–74, text-figs. 1–10.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1938. “Observations on British and Norwegian Hydroids and their Medusæ”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 23, 1–42.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1939. “A Revision of the Genus Campanulina van Beneden”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3, 433–447, text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1958. “The Relationships of Moerisia lyonsi Boulenger, and the Family Moerisiidæ, with Capitate Hydroids”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 130, 537–545, text-figs. 1–5.Google Scholar
Rioja, E., 1924. “Nota sobre un hidroideo de agua salobre de grandia (Annulella gemmata Ritchie)”, Bol. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., 24, 213–216.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1907. “The Hydroids of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 45, 519–545, pls. 45–47.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1907 a. “On the Occurrence of a supposed Australasian Hydroid (Sertularia elongata) in the North Sea”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc., 17, 78–83, Pl. 1.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1908. “On Collections of the Cape Verde Islands Marine Fauna made by Cyril Crossland, M.A., B.Sc, F.Z.S. of St Andrews University, July to September, 1904. The Hydroids”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1907, 488–514, pls. 23–26.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1909 a. “Supplementary Report on the Hydroids of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 47, 65–101.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1909 b. “New Species and Varieties of Hydroida Thecata from the Andaman Islands”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3, 524–528.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1909 c. “Two Unrecorded ‘Challenger’ Hydroids from the Bermudas with a Note on the Synonymy of Campanularia insignis”, Zoologist, 13, 260–263.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1910 a. “The Hydroids of the Indian Museum. Pt. 1. The Deep Sea Collection”, Rec. Indian Mus., 5, 1–30, Pl. 4.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1910 b. “The Marine Fauna of the Mergui Archipelago, Lower Burma, collected by Jas. J. Simpson, M.A., B.Sc, and R. N. Rudmose-Brown, D.Sc, University of Aberdeen, February to May 1907. The Hydroids”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1910, 799–825, pls. 76–77.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1910 c. “Hydroids from Christmas Island, Indian Ocean, Collected by C. W. Andrews, D.Sc, F.R.S., F.Z.S., in 1908”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1910, 826–836.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1910 d; 1911 a. “Contributions to our Knowledge of the Hydroid Fauna of the West Coast of Scotland, being an Account of the Collections made by Sir John Murray, K.C.B. on S.Y. ‘Medusa’”, Ann. Scot. Nat. Hist., 76, 220–225; 77, 29–34; 79, 158–164; 80, 217–225.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1911 b. “Hydrozoa (Hydroid Zoophytes and Stylasterina) of the ‘Thetis’ Expedition”, Mem. Aust. Mus., 4, 807–869, pls. 84–89, text-fig. 126.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1912. “Some Northern Hydroid Zoophytes obtained by Hull Trawlers, with Description of a New Species of Plumularian”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 18, 219–230.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1913 a. “Note on the Type Specimens of Plumularia catharina Johnston, and its so called ‘S.temless Variety’”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 19, 1–5, text-figs. 1–3.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1913 b. “On the Validity of the Hydroid Genus Diplopteron Allman”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 19, 6–7, text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1913 b. “The Hydroid Zoophytes collected by the British Antarctic Expedition of Sir Ernest Shackleton, 1908”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 33, 9–34.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. 1913 d. “A New British Commensal Hydroid, Perigonimus abyssi Sars”, Sci. Invest. Fish. Br. Ire., 1913, 1–3, text-fig. 1.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1914. “Note on Two Unrecorded Plumularian Hydroids from the Plymouth area”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 10, 260–261.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., 1915. “The Hydroids of the Indian Museum. 2. Annulella gemmata, a New and Remarkable Brackish-water Hydroid”, Rec. Indian Mus., 11, 541–568, pls. 30–30a.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. A., 1932. “A Cursory Survey of the Bear Island Trawling Grounds”, Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer., 81, 115–139.Google Scholar
Robson, J. H., 1913. “Hydroida not previously recorded for the District”, Rep. Dove. Mar. Lab., 2, 25–33, pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Robson, J. H., 1914. “A New Gymnoblastic Hydroid. (Described but un-named)”, Rep. Dove. Mar. Lab., 3, 104–106, pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Rotch, W. D., 1871. “On a New Genus and Species of Hydroid Zoophyte (Cladocoryne floccosa)”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 7, 227–228.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1936. “On the Hydroid of Laodicea undulata (Forbes and Goodsir)”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 20, 581–587, text-figs. 1–7.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1953. The Medusæ of the British Isles. Anthomedusæ, Leptomedusæ, Limnomedusæ, Trachymedusæ and Narcomedusæ”, i–xiii, 1–530, pls. 1–35, text-figs. 1–319.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. and Rees, W. J., 1936. “On Rearing the Hydroid Zanclea implexa (Alder) and its Medusa Zanclea gemmosa McCrady, with a Review of the Genus Zanclea”, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 21, 107–129, text-figs. 1–12.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1873. “Bidrag til Kundskaben om Norges Hydroider”, Forh. VidenskSelsk., Krist., 1873, 91–150, text-figs. 2–5.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1835. Beskrivelser og Jagttagelser over nogle maerkelige eller nye i Havet ved den bergenske Kyst levende Dyr, xii and 81 pp. Bergen.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1851. “Beretning om en i Sommeren 1849 foretagen Zoologisk Reise i Lofoten og Finmarken”, Nyt Mag. Naturv., 6, 121–211.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1857. “Bidrag til kundskaben om middehavets Littorat Fauna, Reise bemaerkninger fra Italien. 1. Classis; Polypi”, Nyt Mag. Naturv., 9, 110–164. pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E., 1875. “Coelenteraten”, Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Jhg. 2–3, 121–142, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. B., 1891. “A New Family of Hydroidea, together with a Description of the Structure of a New Species of Plumularia”, Trans. Roy, Soc. Viet., 2, 121–136, pls. 17–23.Google Scholar
Splettstösser, W., 1929. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Sertulariiden. Thyroscyphus Allm., Cnidoscyphus nov. gen., Parascyphus Ritchie”, Zool. Jb. (Syst.), 58, 1–134, text-figs. 1–94.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1907. “Neue japanische Athecata und Plumularidæ aus der Sammlung Dr. Doflein”, Zool. Anz., 32, 192–200.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1909. “Hydroidpolypen der japanischen Ostküste. 1. Athecata und Plumularidæ”, Beitr. Naturg. Ostasiens, 1, 1–111, pls. 1–7 and text-figs. 1–8.Google Scholar
Stechow, E. 1913 a. “Neue Genera thecater Hydroiden aus der Familie der Lafœiden und neue species von Thecaten aus Japan”, Zool. Anz., 43, 137–144.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1913 b. “Hydroidpolypen der japanischen Ostküste. 2. Campanularidæ, Halecidæ, Lafœidæ, Campanulinidæ und Sertularidæ, nebst Ergänzungen zu den Athecata und Plumularidæ”, Beitr. Naturg. Ostasiens, 3, 1–162, text-figs. 1–135.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1919 a. “Neue Ergebnisse auf dem Gebiete der Hydroidenforschung”, Münch. Med. Wschr., 30, 852–853.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1919 b. “Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete, nebst Angaben über einige Kirchenpauper'sche Typen von Plumulariden”, Zool. Jb. (Syst.), 42, 1–172.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1920. “Neue Ergebnisse auf dem Gebiete der Hydroidenforschung”, S.B. Ges. Morph. Physiol. Münch., 31, 9–45.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1921. “Neue Genera und Species von Hydrozoen und anderer Evertebraten”, Arch. Naturgesch., 87A, 248–265.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1922. “Zur Frage des bipolaren Vorkommens mariner Tier”, Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges., 27, 95–96.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1923 a. “Über Hydroiden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition, nebst Bemerkungen über einige andre Formen”, Zool. Anz., 56, 97–119.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1923 b. “Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. 2. Teil”, Zool. Jb. (Syst.), 47, 29–270.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1925. “Hydroiden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition”, Wiss. Ergebn. ‘Valdivia’, 17, 387–546, text-figs. 1–54.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1929. “Über Symbiosen von Hydrozoen mit Polychæten”, Zool. Anz., 86, 150–153.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1932. “Neue Hydroiden aus dem Mittelmeer und dem Pazifischen Ozean nebst Bemerkungen über einige wenig bekannte Formen”, Zool. Anz., 100, 81–92.Google Scholar
Stechow, E. and Muller, H. C., 1923. “Zur Kenntnis der Hydroiden von den Aru-Inseln”, Abh. Senckenb. Naturf. Ges., 35, 458–478, Pl. 27.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W., 1854. “Synopsis of the Marine Invertebrata of Grand Manan, or the Region about the Mouth of the Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick”, Smithson. Contr. Knowl., 6, 1–66, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'A., 1879. “On Some New and Rare Hydroid Zoophytes (Sertulariidœ and Thuiariidœ) from Australia and New Zealand”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3, 97–114, pls. 16–19.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A., 1904. “Scotia Collections. Note on the Gonostyles of Two Antarctic Siphonophora”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 16, 19–22, Pl. 1.Google Scholar
Thomson, W., 1853. “Notes on Some British Zoophytes”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 11, 442–444, Pl. 16a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornely, L. R., 1904. “Report on the Hydroida collected by Professor Herdman at Ceylon in 1902”, Rep. Pearl Fish. Manaar, II., Suppl. Rep. 8, 107–126, pls. 1–3, text-figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
Torrey, H. B., 1902. “The Hydroida of the Pacific Coast of North America”, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 1, 1–104, pls. 1–11.Google Scholar
Totton, A. K., 1930. “Cœlenterata. Pt. 5. Hydroida”, Brit. Antarct. ‘Terra Nova’ Exped. (Zool.), 5, 131–252, pls. 1–3, text-figs. 1–70.Google Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1910. “Die Hydroiden der deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903”, Dtsch. Südpol Exped., XI Zool., 3, 269–340.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E., 1872. “Brief Contributions from the Museum of Yale College. No. 22. On Radiata from the Coast of North Carolina”, Amer. J. Sci., 3, 432–438.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E., 1879. “Notice of Recent Additions to the Marine Fauna of the Eastern Coast of North America. No. 4. Brief Contributions to Zoology from the Museum of Yale College, No. XLL”, Amer. J. Sci., 17, 309–315.Google Scholar
Versluys, J., 1899. “Hydraires Calyptoblastes recueillis dans la mer des Antilles pendant l'une des croisières accomplies par la Compte R. de Dalmas sur son yacht Chazalie”, Mém. Soc. Zool. Fr., 12, 29–58, text-figs. 1–24.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W., 1941. “Biological Results of the Snellius Expedition XI. The Hydroida of the Snellius Expedition (Milleporidæ and Stylasteridæ excluded)”, Temminckia, 6, 186–240, text-figs. 1–11.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W., 1942. “Northern Hydroida in the Collections of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie and the Zoological Museum at Amsterdam, with Notes on their Distribution”, Zool. Meded., 23, 275–312, text-figs. 1–2.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W., 1946 a. “Exotic Hydroids in the Collections of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie and the Zoological Museum at Amsterdam”, Zool. Meded., 26, 287–351, text-figs. 1–10.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W., 1946 b. “Hydrozoa. (C.I.). A. Hydropolypen”, Fauna Nederl., 14, 1–336.Google Scholar
Vervoort, W., 1959. “The Hydroida of the Tropical West Coast of Africa”, Atlantide Rep., 5, 211–325, text-figs. 1–57.Google Scholar
Warren, E., 1906. “On Tubularia solitaria sp. nov. a Hydroid from the Natal Coast”, Ann. Natal Mus., 1, 83–96, pls. 10–11.Google Scholar
Warren, E., 1908. “On a Collection of Hydroids, mostly from the Natal Coast”, Ann. Natal Mus., 1, 269–355, pls. 45–48, and text-figs. 1–23.Google Scholar
Weismann, A., 1883. Die Entstehung der Sexualzellen bei den Hydromedusen. Zugleich als Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Baues und der Lebenserscheinungen dieser Gruppe. Text and Atlas. Jena.Google Scholar
Yamada, M., 1959. “Hydroid Fauna of Japanese and Adjacent Waters”, Publ. Akkeshi Mar. Biol. Sta., 9, 1–101.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1958. “Obituary. Professor James Ritchie, C. B. E.” Nature, Lond., 182, 1483.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. and Drennan, A. M., 1960. “Obituary Notice. James Ritchie”, Yearb. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1959–60, 58–63, Pl. 1Google Scholar