Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:38:55.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical Background to the International Biological Programme Project at Loch Leven, Kinross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

N. C. Morgan
N. C. Morgan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Edinburgh.
Get access

Synopsis

The location and major characteristics of Loch Leven and land use of its catchment are briefly described. The water level was lowered in 1830 affecting migrant fish. Many changes have taken place in the fauna and flora in the present century with serious depletions to the macrophytes, Odonata and Ephemeroptera. The loch is of international importance for waterfowl and was made into a National Nature Reserve in 1964. An IBP project was started in 1966 to measure production and production processes in the food chain to fish and diving duck. Energy and nutrient input, production of phytoplankton, chironomids and the larger trout and perch have been measured for the whole loch. Many other related studies have been carried out. The numbers of several groups have been shown to fluctuate greatly from year to year, as have the principal components of phytoplankton, zooplankton and zoobenthos.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 74 , 1974 , pp. 45 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Allison, A., and Newton, I., 1974. Waterfowl at Loch Leven. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 365–381.Google Scholar
Bailey-Watts, A. E., 1973. Observations on the phytoplankton of Loch Leven, Kinross, Scotland. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Lond.Google Scholar
Bailey-Watts, A. E., 1974. The algal plankton of Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 135–156.Google Scholar
Bailey-Watts, A. E., Bindloss, M. E., and Belcher, J. H., 1968. Freshwater primary production by a blue-green alga of bacterial size. Nature, Lond., 220, 1344–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bindloss, M. E., Holden, A. V., Bailey-Watts, A. E., and Smith, I. R., 1972. Phytoplankton production, chemical and physical conditions in Loch Leven. Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970, 639–659.Google Scholar
Britton, R. H., 1974. Factors affecting the distribution and productivity of emergent vegetation at Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 209–218.Google Scholar
Brook, A. J., 1965. Planktonic algae as indicators of lake types with special reference to the Desmidiaceae. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10, 403–411.Google Scholar
Burns-Begg, R., 1874. The Loch Leven Angler. 144 pp. Kinross: Barnett.Google Scholar
Holden, A. V., and Caines, L. A., 1974. Nutrient chemistry of Loch Leven. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 101–121.Google Scholar
Johnson, D., and Walker, A. F., 1974. The zooplankton of Loch Leven, Kinross, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 285–294.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. M., (Ed.), 1934. The Loch Leven Angler. 148 pp. Kinross: Brown.Google Scholar
Jupp, B., Spence, D. H. N., and Britton, R. H., 1974. The distribution and production of submerged macrophytes in Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 195–208.Google Scholar
Maitland, P. S., and Hudspith, P. M. G., 1974. The zoobenthos of Loch Leven, Kinross and estimates of its production in the sandy littoral area during 1970 and 1971. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 219–239.Google Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1970. Changes in the fauna and flora of a nutrient enriched lake. Hydrobiologia, 35, 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1972. Productivity studies at Loch Leven (a shallow nutrient rich lowland lake). Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970, 183–205.Google Scholar
Morgan, N. C., and McClusky, D., 1974. A summary of the Loch Leven IBP results in relation to lake management and future research. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 407–416.Google Scholar
Munro, W. R., and Balmain, K. H., 1956. Observations on the spawning runs of brown trout in the South Queich, Loch Leven. Scient. Invest. Freshwat. Salm. Fish. Res. Scott. Home Dep., 13, 1–17.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M., 1937. Algae and trout. A biological aspect of the poor trout season in 1937. Salm. Trout. Mag., 89, 313–322.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1891. The invertebrate fauna of the inland waters of Scotland, Part II, 9th Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., III, 269–296.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1899. The invertebrate fauna of the inland waters of Scotland–report on special investigation. 17th Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., Part III. 161–165.Google Scholar
Thorpe, J. E., 1974. Trout and perch populations at Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 295–313.Google Scholar
Walker, A. F., 1971. The zooplankton of Loch Leven. M.Sc. Thesis, Stirling Univ.Google Scholar
West, G., 1910. A further contribution to a comparative study of the dominant phanerogamic and higher cryptogamic flora of aquatic habit in Scottish lakes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 30, 65–181 and 62 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar