Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:35:43.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Furunculosis—an old problem facing a new industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. L. S. Munro
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Victoria Road, Aberdeen
Get access

Synopsis

Furunculosis has caused serious economic losses in some Atlantic salmon farms in Scotland. It is considered that the disease has the potential to be a significant economic problem to the whole industry unless control measures are adopted. When salmon in a farmed population carry the disease agent in non-clinical form the bacterium has low to intermediate virulence, but in stocks with recurring clinical disease, virulence is apparently increased. The significance of these observations is discussed in terms of the major methods of control, namely avoidance, husbandry procedures, chemotherapy, vaccines and statutory controls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, G. L. and Stuckey, H. M. 1975. Aeromonas salmonicida: detection of asymptomatically infected trout. Progve Fish Cult. 31, 9093.Google Scholar
Cormick, J. W., Chudyk, R. V. and MacDermott, L. A. 1969. Habitat and viability studies on Aeromonas salmonicida, causative agent of furunculosis. Progve Fish Cult. 31, 9093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croy, T. R. and Amend, D. F. 1977. Immunisation of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) against vibriosis using hyperosmotic infiltration. Aquaculture 12, 317325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, D. C. B. 1942. The oral immunisation of trout against Bacterium salmonicida. J. Immun. 44, 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. E., Hastings, T. S. and Munro, A. L. S. 1981. The role of Aeromonas salmonicida extracellular products in the pathology of furunculosis. J. Fish Dis. 4, 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, T., Ogishima, K., Hayasaka, H., Kaneko, S. and Ohshima, S. 1973a. Application of oxalinic acid as a chemotherapeutic agent against fish diseases. I — Antibacterial activity, chemotherapeutic effects and pharmacokinetics of oxolinic acid in fishes. Bull. Jap. Soc. Scient. Fish. 39 (2), 165171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, T., Sakuma, M., Tanaka, H., Ogishima, K., Hara, T., Ohshima, S. and Sato, Y. 1973b. Application of oxolinic acid as a chemotherapeutic agent against infectious diseases in fishes. II — Explanation of chemotherapeutic effect by whole body autobacteriography. Bull. Jap. Soc. Scient. Fish. 39, 173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, P. J. 1954. Nature of bacteria pathogenic to fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 83, 241253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, R. L. 1968. Fish furunculosis. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97, 221230.Google Scholar
Karlssen, K. A. 1962. Studies on the haemolysin of Aeromonas salmonicida. Nord. VetMed. 14, suppl. 2.Google Scholar
Klontz, G. W. and Anderson, D. P. 1970. Oral immunization of salmonids: a review. In A symposium on diseases offish and wildlife, ed. Snieszko, S. F. Amer. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 5, pp. 1620. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Klontz, G. W., Yasutake, W. T. and Ross, A. J. 1966. Bacterial diseases of the salmonidae in the Western United States. Pathogenesis of furunculosis in rainbow trout. Am. J. Vet. Res. 27, 14551460.Google Scholar
Krantz, G. E., Reddecliff, J. M. and Heist, C. E. 1963. Development of antibodies against A. salmonicida in trout. J. Immun. 91, 757760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krantz, G. E., Reddecliff, J. M. and Heist, C. E. 1964. Immune response of trout to Aeromonas salmonicida. Part 2. Evaluation of feeding techniques. Progve Fish Cult. 26, 6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, T. J., Arkwright, J. A., Pryce-Tannatt, T. E., Mottram, J. C., Johnstone, W. P. and Menzies, W. J. M. 1930, 1933, 1935. Interim, second and final reports of the furunculosis committee. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. H. 1977. Some ecological aspects of the bacterial fish pathogen, Aeromonas salmonicida. Aquatic Microbiol. SAB Symp. 6, 299–324.Google Scholar
McCraw, B. M. 1952. Furunculosis offish. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. 84.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. H. and Roberts, R. J. 1980. Furunculosis offish. Adv. Aquatic Microbiol. 2, 293342.Google Scholar
Munro, A. L. S., Hastings, T. S., Ellis, A. E. and Liversidge, J. 1980. Studies on an ichthyotoxic material produced extracellularly by the furunculosis bacterium Aeromonas salmonicida. In Fish Diseases Third COPRAQ-Session, ed. Ahne, W. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Paterson, W. D. and Fryer, J. L. 1974. Immune response of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) to Aeromonas salmonicida cells administered intraperitoneally in Freunds complete adjuvant. J. Fish. Res. BdCan. 31, 17511755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. D. 1981. In Stress and Fish. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. J. 1978. In Fish Pathology, ed. Roberts, R. J. p. 30. London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Shieh, H. S. and McLean, J. R. 1975. Purification and properties of an extracellular protease of Aeromonas salmonicida, the causative agent of furunculosis. Int. J. Biochem. 6, 653 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I. W. 1962. Furunculosis in kelt. Freshwat. Salm. Fish. Res. 27, 15.Google Scholar
Smith, W. W. 1940. Production of anti-bacterial agglutinins of carp and trout at 10 C. Proc. Soc. Expt Biol. Med. 45, 726729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udey, L. R. and Fryer, J. L. 1978. Immunisation of fish with bacterins ofAeromonas salmonicida. Mar. Fish. Rev. 40, 1217.Google Scholar
Wedemeyer, G. A. 1981. The physiological response of fishes to the stress of intensive aquaculture in recirculation systems. In Aquaculture in Heated Effluents and Recirculation Systems, ed. Tiews, K. Vol. II. Berlin: Heenemann.Google Scholar
Wedemeyer, G., Ross., A. J. and Smith, L. 1969. Some metabolic effects of bacterial endotoxins in fish. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar