Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:21:23.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecological consequences of arthropod grazing on VA mycorrhizal fungi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

T. P. McGonigle
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York Y01 5DD, U.K.
A. H. Fitter
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York, York Y01 5DD, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Soil Collembola may be partially responsible for observed reductions in effectiveness of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) associations in the field, compared with sterile soil experiments. Feeding damage to hyphae in soil is envisaged as a mechanism by which translocation of phosphorous from beyond root depletion zones to the plants is reduced. Previous work has demonstrated such effects in pots and in a cultivated field plot, and direct observation of feeding has been made. This paper briefly reviews this evidence and presents an experiment in which insecticide reduced the density of Collembola in a seminatural grassland soil, and increased phosphorus inflow into roots of Holcus lanatus. In addition, survey data are reported which show that hyphal grazing is ecologically feasible, as Collembola and infected roots are spatially associated with one another in the soil profile. It is suggested that hyphal grazing by these arthropods has important consequences for VAM function in natural vegetation systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. B. & Allen, M. F. 1986. Water relations of xeric grasses in the field: interactions of mycorrhizas and competition. New Phytologist 104, 559571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S. E. 1974. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Bullock, P. 1974. Soils in Yorkshire III. Soil Survey Record No. 16. Harpenden: Rothamsted Experimental Station Lawes Agricultural Trust.Google Scholar
Duffey, E., Morris, M. G., Sheail, J., Ward, L. K., Wells, D. A. & Wells, T. C. E. 1974. Grassland Ecology and Wildlife Management. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. D. 1985. Interactions between soil micro-arthropods and endomycorrhizal associations of higher plants. In Ecological Interactions in Soil, ed. Fitter, A. H., pp. 319331. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Fitter, A. H. 1985. Functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas under field conditions. New Phytologist 99, 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, A. H. 1986. Effect of benomyl on leaf phosphorus concentration in alpine grasslands: a test of mycorrhizal benefit. New Phytologist 103, 767776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, D. S. 1983. The physiology of vesicular-arbuscular endomycorrhizal symbiosis. Canadian Journal of Botany 61, 944963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, I. 1986. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in field-grown crops III. Mycorrhizal infection and rates of phosphorus inflow in pea plants. New Phytologist 104, 573581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kormanik, P. P. & McGraw, A. C. 1982. Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. In Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research, ed. Schenck, N. C., Chap. 4, pp. 3745. St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
McGonigle, T. P. 1987. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas and plant performance in a semi-natural grassland. D.Phil. Thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
McGonigle, T. P. & Fitter, A. H. 1988. Growth and phosphorus inflows of Trifolium repens L. with a range of indigenous vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection levels under field conditions. New Phytologist 108, 5965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mejstrik, V. K. 1972. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas of the species of a Molinietum coeruleae L. I. association: the ecology. New Phytologist 71, 883890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, J. A. 1982. Effect of soil fumigants and fungicides on vesicular-arbuscular fungi. Phytopathology 72, 11251132.Google Scholar
Molina, R. J., Trappe, J. M. & Strickler, G. S. 1978. Mycorrhizal fungi associated with Festuca in the western United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 56, 16911695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. C., St. John, T. V. & Coleman, D. C. 1985. Ingestion of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and spores by soil microarthropods. Ecology 66, 19791981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, B. & Hayman, D. S. 1980. Mycorrhiza in agricultural plants. In Tropical Mycorrhiza Research, ed. Mikola, P., Chap. 25, pp. 213230. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rangeley, A., Daft, M. J. & Newbould, P. 1982. The inoculation of white clover with mycorrhizal fungi in unsterile hill soils. New Phytologist 92, 89102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. J., Koucheki, H. K. & Hodgson, J. 1976. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. New Phytologist 77, 641653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, F. E. & Tinker, P. B. 1973. Phosphate flow into mycorrhizal roots. Pesticide Science 4, 385395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaull, A. M., Clements, R. O., Ridout, M. S. & Mewton, P. G. 1986. Ryegrass establishment and yield in relation to pesticide treatment, irrigation and fertilizer level. Annals of Applied Biology 109, 353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M. B. & Booth, R. G. 1984. A portable extractor for separating microarthropods from soil. Pedobiologia 26, 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veresoglou, D. S. 1983. Partitioning of nutrients between co-existing grassland species. D.Phil. Thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Warnock, A. J., Fitter, A. H. & Usher, M. B. 1982. The influence of a springtail Folsomia Candida (Insecta, Collembola) on the mycorrhizal association of the leek Allium porrum and the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal endophyte Glomus fasciculatus. New Phytologist 90, 285292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar