Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:08:17.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioturbation, microbial activity and sediment properties in an estuarine ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

P. S. Meadows  and
A. Tufail
P. S. Meadows
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
A. Tufail
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
Get access

Synopsis

Macrobenthic bioturbation and microbial activity can have major ecological effects on present day marine sediments some of which are also seen in the fossil record. The coastal and estuarine sediments in the Clyde Estuary area are described. They contain very high densities of benthic macroorganisms and microorganisms. These organisms have dramatic effects on the physical and chemical properties of sediments, and field and laboratory studies have shown that many geotechnical and geochemical properties of sediments are dictated by them. The effects can be on a microscale of a few millimetres horizontally or vertically (micro-spatial variation), or can have large scale consequences over hundreds of metres (macro-spatial variation).

Sediment stability (shear strength and critical erosion velocity), permeability and particle sedimentation are all altered by macro-invertebrate bioturbation or microbial activity, and many chemical properties such as Eh and pH may be influenced in a similar manner.

Biological activity may therefore play a major role in modifying sediment geotechnics and early sediment diagenesis. It also has direct relevance to the siting of man-made structures on the sea-bed and to sediment stability and transport in estuaries. In situ seeding experiments may lead to biological control and manipulation of these most important field phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 90: The Environment of the Estuary and Firth of Clyde , 1986 , pp. 129 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aller, R. C. 1978a. Experimental studies of changes produced by deposit feeders on pore water, sediment, and overlying water chemistry. American Journal of Science 278, 1185–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1978b. The effects of animal-sediment interactions on geochemical processes near the sedimentwater interface. In Estuarine Interactions, ed. Wiley, M. L., pp. 157–172. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1980a. Diagenetic processes near the sediment-water interface of Long Island Sound. I. Decomposition and nutrient element geochemistry (S, N, P). Advances in Geophysics 22, 237–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1980b. Quantifying solute distributions in the bioturbated zone of marine sediments by defining an average microenvironment. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Ada 44, 1955–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1980c. Relationships of tube-dwelling benthos with sediment and over-lying water chemistry. In Marine Benthic Dynamics, eds. Tenore, K. R., & Coull, B. C, pp. 285–308. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1982. The effects of macrobenthos on chemical properties of marine sediment and overlying water. In Animal-sediment Relations, eds. McCall, P. L. & Tevesz, M. J. S., Ch. 2, pp. 53–103. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. 1983. The importance of the diffusive permeability of animal burrow linings in determining marine sediment chemistry. Journal of Marine Research 41, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aller, R. C. & Yingst, J. 1978. Biogeochemistry of tube-dwellings: a study of the sedentary polychaete Amphitrite ornata (Leidy). Journal of Marine Research 36, 201–254.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G., Boonruang, P. & Meadows, P. S. 1981. Interrelationships between chlorophylls, carbon, nitrogen and heterotrophic bacteria in an intertidal sediment transect. Marine Ecology Progress Series 6, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. G., & Meadows, P. S. 1978. Microenvironments in marine sediments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 76B, 1–16.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. A., Moore., P. G. & Morgan, P. J. 1982. The burrows and burrowing behavior of Maera loveni (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of Zoology 198, 399–416.Google Scholar
Bathurst, R. G. C. 1967. Subtidal gelatinous mat, sand stabilizer and food, Great Bahama Bank. Journal of Geology 75, 736–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, R. A. 1980. Early Diagenesis. A Theoretical Approach. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. Y. 1891. On the composition of oceanic and littoral manganese nodules. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 36, 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadée, G. C. 1976. Sediment reworking by Arenicola marina on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 10, 440–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadée, G. C. 1979. Sediment reworking by the polycheate Heteromastus filiformis on a tidal flat in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherland Journal of Sea Research 13, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, R. S. 1981. Bioturbation and biodeposition. In Principles of Benthic Marine Paleoecology, by Boucot, A. J., Ch. 5, pp.357–445.Google Scholar
Deegan, C. E., Kirby, R., Rae, I. & Floyd, R. 1973. The superficial deposits of the Firth of Clyde and its sea lochs. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences 73(9).Google Scholar
Eckmann, J. E., Nowell, A. R. M. & Jumars, P. A. 1981. Sediment destabilization by animal tubes. Journal of Marine Research 39, 361–374.Google Scholar
Fager, E. W. 1964. Marine sediments: effects of a tube-building polychaete. Science 143, 356–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folk, R. L. 1968. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Austin: Hemphill Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Frankel, L. & Mead, D. J. 1973. Mucilaginous matrix of some estuarine sands in Connecticut. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 43, 1090–1095.Google Scholar
Frostick, L. E. & McCave, I. N. 1979. Seasonal shifts of sediment within an estuary mediated by algal growth. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 9, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girling, A. E. 1984. Interactions between marine benthic macroinvertebrates and their sedimentary environment. Ph.D. Thesis, Glasgow University, Scotland.Google Scholar
Hennig, H. F.-K. O., Fricke, A. H. & Martin, C. T. 1983. In Sandy Beaches as Ecosystems, eds. McLachlan, A. & Erasmus, T., pp. 235–247. The Hague: Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjulström, F. 1939. Transportation of detritus by moving water. In Recent Marine Sediments, ed.Trask, P. D., pp. 5–31. London: T. Murby & Co. for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.Google Scholar
Holland, A. F., Zingmark, R. G. & Dean, J. M. 1974. Quantitative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms. Marine Biology 27, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, D. W. & Rhoads, D. C. 1983. The evolution of infaunal communities and sedimentary fabrics. In Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities, eds. Tevesz, M. J. S. & McCall, P. L., Ch. 12, pp. 625–648. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. 1964a. Experiments on substrate selection by Corophium species: films and bacteria on sand particles. Journal of Experimental Biology 41, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. 1964b. Experiments on substrate selection by Corophium volutator (Pallas): depth selection and population density. Journal of Experimental Biology 41, 677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. 1964c. Substrate selection by Corophium species: the particle size of substrates. Journal of Animal Ecology 33, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. & Anderson, J. G. 1968. Micro-organisms attached to marine sand grains. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 48, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. & Campbell, J. I. 1972a. Habitat selection by aquatic invertebrates. Advances in Marine Biology 10, 271–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. & Campbell, J. I. 1972b. Habitat selection and animal distribution in the sea: the evolution of a concept. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 73B, 145–157.Google Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. & Tait, J. 1985. Bioturbation, geotechnics and microbiology at the sediment-water interface in deep-sea sediments. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Marine Biology Symposium, ed. Gibbs, P. E., pp. 191–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MeadowsP, S. P, S. & Tait, J. & Hussain, S. A. 1986. Effects of estuarine animals on sediment stability and particle sedimentation. (Submitted for publication.)Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1931. The muds of the Clyde sea area III. Chemical and physical conditions, rate and nature of sedimentation and fauna. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 17, 325–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, R. D. M., Chapman, C. J., Atkinson, R. J. A. & Morgan, P. J. 1984. Observations on the burrows and burrowing behaviour of Calocaris macandreae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinoidea). Journal of Zoology 202, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, A. C, Gebelein, C. D. & Scoffin, T. P. 1970. The composition, structure and erodability of subtidal mats, Abaco, Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40, 274–296.Google Scholar
Nowell, A. R. M., Jumars, P. A. & Eckman, J. E. 1981. Effects of biological activity on the entrainment of marine sediments. Marine Geology 42, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reineck, H.-E. & Singh, I. B. 1980. Depositional Sedimentary Environments. 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer- Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. 1963. Rates of sediment reworking by Yoldia limatula in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, and Long Island Sound. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 33, 723–727.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. 1967. Biogenic reworking of intertidal and subtidal sediments in Barnstable Harbor and Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. Journal of Geology 75, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D. C., Yingst, J. Y. & Ullman, W. J. 1978. Seafloor stability in Central Long Island Sound: Part 1. Temporal changes in erodability of fine grained sediment. In Estuarine Interactions, ed. Wiley, M. L., pp. 221–244. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfter, W. 1972. Ecology and Paleoecology of Marine Environments, translated by Irmgard Oertal, ed. Craig, G. Y. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Scoffin, T. P. 1970. The trapping and binding of subtidal carbonate sediments by marine vegetation in Bimini Lagoon, Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40, 249–273.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. 1981. Soil Mechanics. 4th edn. London: George Godwin Limited.Google Scholar
Sundborg, A. 1956. The River Klaralven. A study of fluvial processes. Geografiska Annaler 38, 127–316.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of marine benthos. In Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities, eds. Tevesz, M. J. S. & McCall, P.L., Ch. 11, pp. 479–625. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufail, A. 1985. Microbial aggregates on sand grains in enrichment media. Botanica Marina 28, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormald, A.P. & Stirling, H. P. 1979. A preliminary investigation of nutrient enrichment in experimental sand columns and its effect on tropical intertidal bacteria and meiofauna. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 8, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar