Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:32:17.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The benthic fauna of sandy bays, with particular reference to Irvine Bay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. Eleftheriou ,
M. R. Robertson  and
D. J. Murison
A. Eleftheriou
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DB, Scotland
M. R. Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DB, Scotland
D. J. Murison
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DB, Scotland
Get access

Synopis

The coastal areas in the Firth of Clyde, of which Irvine Bay is a representative example, receive important amounts of industrial and urban wastes which are a cause of economic and environmental concern.

Surveys of the benthos of Irvine Bay revealed a varied fauna dominated by large densities of opportunistic polychaetes such as Chaetozone and Spio and nematodes whose distribution correlated very strongly with the high organic carbon levels in the bay. The high densities and large biomass recorded in Irvine Bay were found to be 2–3 times higher than values from Loch Ewe, a clean area with normal carbon values.

All evidence from this survey points towards a situation in which the fauna is enhanced, yet does not suffer a species reduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 90: The Environment of the Estuary and Firth of Clyde , 1986 , pp. 317 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, A. D. 1961. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Venus striatula (da Costa) in Kames Bay Millport. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 41, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D. 1972. Distribution, growth and seasonal changes in biochemical composition for the bivalve Donax vittatus (da Costa) from Kames Bay, Millport. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 10, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, A. D., Barnett, P. R. O. & Hardy, B. L. S. 1968. Shore ecology. Report of the Scottish Marine Biological Association 1968, 20.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. R. O. 1971. Some changes in intertidal sand communities due to thermal pollution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 177B, 353–364.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D. 1974. The benthos of the Firth of Clyde: an assessment of present knowledge. In The Clyde Estuary and Firth. An assessment of present knowledge compiled by members of the Clyde Study Group, pp. 36–39. Natural Environment Research Council, Publications Series No. 11.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D. & Hardy, B. L. S. 1969. The effects of temperature on the benthos near the Hunterston generating station, Scotland. Chesapeake Science 10, 255–256.Google Scholar
Baxter, I. E. 1974. Further experimental studies on Clyde herring eggs and larvae. Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM 1974/E:35.Google Scholar
Caspers, H. 1978. Ecological effects of sewage sludge on benthic fauna off the German North Sea Coast. Progress in Water Technology 9, 951–956.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B. & Milne, A. 1955. The sublittoral fauna of two sandy bays on the Isle of Cumbrae, Firth of Clyde. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, S. 1969. The comparative life histories of three Cumacea (Crustacea): Cumopsis goodsiri (Van Beneden), Iphinoe trispinosa (Goodsir), and Pseudocuma longicornis (Bate). Canadian Journal of Zoology 47, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, S. 1970. The quantitative distribution of three Cumacea (Crustacea Peracarida) in Kames Bay, Scotland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 48, 925–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagle, R. A., Hardiman, P. A., Norton, M. G. & Nunny, R. S. 1979. The field assessment of dumping wastes at sea: 4. A survey of the sewage disposal area off Plymouth. Fisheries Research Technical Report 50. Lowestoft: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food.Google Scholar
Eleftheriou, A. & Mclntyre, A. D. 1976. The intertidal fauna of sandy beaches: Survey of the Scottish Coast. Scottish Fisheries Research Report 6. Aberdeen: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland.Google Scholar
Eleftheriou, A., Moore, D. C, Basford, D. J. & Robertson., M. R. 1982. Underwater experiments on the effects of sewage sludge on a marine ecosystem. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16, 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmhirst, R. 1931. Studies in the Scottish marine fauna. The Crustacea of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 51, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heip, C. 1974. A new index measuring evenness. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54, 555–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummon, W. D. 1975. Habitat suitability and the ideal free distribution of Gastrotricha in a cyclic environment. In Proceedings of the 9th European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, ed. Barnes, H., pp. 495–525. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Hummon, W. D. 1976. Seasonal changes in secondary production, faunal similarity and biological accommodation, related to stability among the Gastrotricha of 2 semi-enclosed Scottish beaches. In Proceedings of the 9th European Biology Symposium, Ostend. Belgium, eds. Personne, G. & Jaspers, E., Vol.2, pp. 309–336. Wetteren: Universa Press.Google Scholar
Hummon, W. D. & Hummon, M. R. 1977. Meiobenthic subcommunity structure: Spatial va. Temporal variability. In Proceedings of the 11th European Marine Biology Symposium, Galway, Ireland, eds. Keegan, B. F.. O'Ceidigh, P. & Boaden, P. J. S., pp. 339–347. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jaccard, P. 1902. Loi de distribution florale dans la zone alpine. Bulletin de la societe vaudoise des Sciences naturelles 38, 69–130.Google Scholar
Jayasree, K. 1976. Systemaucs and ecology of free-living marine nematodes from polluted intertidal sand in Scotland. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., Adams, J. A. & Dooley, H. D. 1971. Some observations on the hydrography, chemistry and plankton of the Firth of Clyde in relation to nitrate-rich effluents. Aberdeen: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Internal Report No IR29–71.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. E. 1975. The macrobenthic infauna of the Firth of Clyde. Undergraduate Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Lambshead, P. J. D. 1983. An investigation into the use of freeliving marine nematodes as pollution monitoring organisms with special reference to the Clyde estuary. Ph.D. Thesis, Brunei University of Technology.Google Scholar
Lambshead, P. J. D. 1984. The nematode/copepod ratio: some anomalous results from the Firth of Clyde. Marine Pollution Bulletin 15, 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, A. D. 1970. The range of biomass in intertidal sand with special reference to the bivalve Tellina tenuis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 50, 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, A. D. 1977. Effects of pollution on inshore benthos. In Ecology of Marine Benthos, ed. Coull, B. C, pp. 301–318. Columbia: University of Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Mclntyre, A. D. & Eleftheriou, A. 1968. The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 48, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, A. D. & Murison, D. J. 1972. The benthos of a polluted beach. Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM 1972/E:29.Google Scholar
Mclntyre, A. D. & Murison, D. J. 1973. The meiofauna of a flatfish nursery ground. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 53, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1931. The muds of the Clyde Sea area III. Chemical and physical conditions; rate and nature of sedimentation; and fauna. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 17, 325–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. G. 1935. Copepods from the interstitial fauna of a sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 20, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. G. 1939. Some new sand-dwelling copepods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poxton, M. G., Eleftheriou., A. & Mclntyre, A. D. 1982. The population dynamics of O-group flatfish on nursery grounds in the Clyde sea area. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 14, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poxton, M. G., Eleftheriou., A. & Mclntyre, A. D. 1983. The food and growth of O-group flatfish on nursery grounds in the Clyde sea area. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 17, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, D. G. & Mason., C. F. 1981. Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the Fatio of nematodes to copepods. Marine Pollution Bulletin 12, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver., W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. I. 1955. Salinity variation in interstitial water of sand at Kames Bay, Millport, with reference to the distribution of Nereis diversicolor. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C. 1929. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 56, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C. 1932. Notes on the biology of certain lamellibranchs in the Clyde area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 18, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C. 1953. Life in some sandy shores. In Essays in Marine Biology, eds. Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., pp. 50–72. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E. 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 60, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watling, L., Leathern, W., Kinner, P., Wethe, C. & Maurer, D. 1974. Evaluation of sludge dumping off Delaware Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin 5, 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar