Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:10:21.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X.—The Factorial Analysis of Multiple Item Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

D. N. Lawley
D. N. Lawley
Affiliation:
Moray House, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

6. The expected score of an individual on a test consisting of a large number of items is assumed to be given by a formula involving the ability of the individual and also two quantities constant for the test. An expression is then derived for the covariance between two tests measuring different abilities. It appears that if a factorial analysis is performed on a set of tests of unequal difficulty, using the matrix of variances and covariances, a spurious factor will tend to be introduced depending mainly on the differences in difficulty. The effect of this is removed by transforming the variances and covariances to a new set of coefficients. A numerical example of the process is given.

In conclusion I should like to thank the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland for a grant to cover the cost of the setting and printing of mathematical formulæ in a paper previously published in the Society's Proceedings (LXI, A, 1943, 273–287).

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , 1944 , pp. 74 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO LITERATURE

Bliss, C. I., 1935a. “The Calculation of the Dosage-Mortality Curve,” Ann. Appl. Biol., XXII, 134–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I., 1935b. “The Comparison of Dosage-Mortality Data,” Ann. Appl. Biol., XXII, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G. A., 1941. “The Factorial Interpretation of Test Difficulty,” Psychometrika, VI, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawley, D. N., 1941. “Further Investigations in Factor Estimation,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., LXI, 176–185.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N., 1943a. “On Problems connected with Item Selection and Test Construction,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., LXI, 273–287.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N., 1943b. “The Application of the Maximum Likelihood Method to Factor Analysis,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., XXXIII, 172–175.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., 1930. Tables for Statisticians and Biometricians, Part I, Cambridge University Press, 3rd ed., pp. 42–51.Google Scholar