No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
VII.—The Clear-Day Barometric Curve at Ben Nevis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2012
Summary
An examination of the Ben Nevis barometric records shows that, when the non-periodic convex variation is eliminated, the clear-day barometric curve differs but little from the normal curve obtained from all days. The results prove that the clear-day excess found by Buchan and Omond is mainly (though not entirely) due to bias in the selection of data.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , 1941 , pp. 71 - 76
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1941
References
References to Literature
Bartels, J., 1927. “Uber die atmosphärischen Gezeiten,” Veröff. Preuss. Met. Inst., Abh. 8, nr. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, J., 1935. “Random Fluctuations, Persistence, and Quasi-Persistence in Geophysical and Cosmical Periodicities,” Terrestrial Magnetism, vol. xl, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Buchan, A., and Omond, R. T., 1902. “Diurnal Range of the Barometer in Fine and Cloudy Weather,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlii, Appendix, pp. 448–463.Google Scholar
Buchan, A., and Omond, R. T., 1890-1910. “The Meteorology of the Ben Nevis Observatories,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vols. xxxiv, xlii-xliv.Google Scholar
Chapman, S., 1936. “The Lunar Atmospheric Tide at Glasgow,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. Ivi, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Robb, R. A., and Tannahill, T. R., 1939. “Lunar Atmospheric Pressure Variations at Glasgow,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar