Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:57:48.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sign-definite solutions in some linear elliptic systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Chris Cosner  and
Philip W. Schaefer
Chris Cosner
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124, U.S.A.
Philip W. Schaefer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

We consider a weakly coupled set of two partial differential equations where the coupling matrix has variable elements and the principal part of each equation is the same uniformly elliptic operator. Weobtain necessary conditions that the system of equations can be decoupled. By decoupling the system and using a positivity lemma due to Hess and Kato, we determine the algebraic sign of the solution components. This work extends recent results of de Figueiredo and Mitidieri. Further, one can use these results to determine the sign of the solution to certain fourth order elliptic boundary value problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 111 , Issue 3-4 , 1989 , pp. 347 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Blat, J. and Brown, K J.. Bifurcation of steady state solutions in predator–prey and competition systems. Proc Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 97A (1984), 21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cantrell, R. S. and Cosner, C.. On eigenfunctions with sign definite components in weakly coupled linear elliptic systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (to appear).Google Scholar
3Cantrell, R. S. and Schmitt, K.. On the eigenvalue problem for coupled elliptic systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17 (1986), 850–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Cosner, C. and Schindler, F.. Upper and lower solutions for systems of second order equations with nonnegative characteristic form and discontinuous coefficients. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 14 (1984), 549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cosner, C. and Schaefer, P. W.. A comparison principle for a class of fourth-order elliptic operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 128 (1987), 488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6deFigueiredo, D. G. and Mitidieri, E.. A maximum principle for an elliptic system and applications to semilinear problems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17 (1986), 836–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hernandez, J.. Maximum principles and decoupling for positive solutions of reaction-diffusion systems (preprint).Google Scholar
8Hess, P. and Kato, T.. On some linear and nonlinear eigenvalue problems with an indefinite weight function. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 5 (1980), 999–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Protter, M. H. and Weinberger, H. F.. Maximum Principles in Differential Equations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967).Google Scholar
10Schaefer, P. W. and Cosner, C.. Sign-definite solutions in elliptic systems with constant coefficients. Proc. Int. Conf. on Theory and Applications of Differential Equations, Ohio Univ., 1988.Google Scholar
11Sweers, G.. Semilinear elliptic eigenvalue problems. (Thesis, Technische Universiteit, Delft, Netherlands, 1988).Google Scholar
12Wasowski, J.. Maximum principles for a certain strongly elliptic systems of linear equation of second order. Bull, de L'Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Series des sciences math., astr., et phys. XVIII (1970), 741–745Google Scholar
13Weinberger, H. F.. Some remarks on invariant sets for systems. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series 175 (1988), 189–207Google Scholar