Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T22:49:55.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Positive solutions of a non-linear eigenvalue problem with discontinuous non-linearity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Paolo Nistri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica, Università della Calabria, Cosenza, Italy

Synopsis

We seek non-trivial solutions (u,λ)∈C1([0,1])×[0,∞ with u(x)≧0 for all x ∈[0,1], of the nonlinear eigenvalue problem –u″(x)=λf(u(x)) for x ∈ (0,1) and u(0)=u(1)=0,where f:[0,∞)→[0,∞) is such that f(p) = 0, for p ∈ [0,1), and f(p) = K(p), for p ∈ (1,∞), and K: [1, ∞)→(0, ∞) is assumed to be twice continuously differentiable. (The value ƒ(1) is only required to be positive.)

Existence and multiplicity theorems are given in the cases where ƒ is asymptotically sub-linear and ƒ is asymptotically super-linear. Moreover if strengthened assumptions are made on the growth of the non-linear term ƒ we obtain the precise number of non-trivial solutions for given values of λ ∈ [0, ∞).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Stuart, C. A.. Differential equations with discontinuous non-linearities. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 63 (1976), 5575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Stuart, C. A.. Boundary value problems with discontinuous non-linearities. Proc. Conf. Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations, Dundee, 1976. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 564, 472484 (Berlin: Springer, 1976).Google Scholar
3Stuart, C. A.. The number of solutions of boundary value problems with discontinuous non-linearities. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 66 (1977), 225235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Laetsch, T.. The number of solutions of a non-linear two point boundary value problem. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 20 (1970), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar