Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:38:11.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the essential self-adjointness of Schrödinger operators with locally integrable potentials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

H. Kalf  and
F. S. Rofe-Beketov
H. Kalf
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut der Universität München, Theresienstrasse 39, D-80333 Munchen, Germany
F. S. Rofe-Beketov
Affiliation:
B.I. Verkin Institute of Low Temperature Physics and Engineering, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, 47, Lenin Avenue, 310164 Kharkov, Ukraine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Results by Simader, Brézis and Cycon of the genre ‘locally essentially self-adjoint implies globally essentially self-adjoint’ are generalised to Schrödinger operators that are not necessarily bounded from below.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 128 , Issue 1 , 1998 , pp. 95 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Brézis, H.. ‘Localized’ self-adjointness of Schrödinger operators. J. Operator Theory 1 (1979), 287–90.Google Scholar
2Brézis, H. and Kato, T.. Remarks on the Schrödinger operator with singular complex potentials. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 58 (1979), 137–51.Google Scholar
3Cycon, H. L.. A theorem on ‘localized’ self-adjointness of Schrödinger operators with L1loc-potentials. Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 5 (1982), 545–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Eastham, M. S. P., Evans, W. D. and McLeod, J. B.. The essential self-adjointness of Schrödingertype operators. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 60 (1976), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Everitt, W. N., Giertz, M. and McLeod, J. B.. On the strong and weak limit-point classification of second-order differential expressions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 29 (1974), 142–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Faris, W. and Lavine, R.. Commutators and self-adjointness of Hamiltonian operators. Comm. Math. Phys. 35(1974), 39–48.Google Scholar
7Glazman, I. M.. Direct Methods of Qualitative Spectral Analysis of Singular Differential Operators (Jerusalem; Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1965).Google Scholar
8Hinz, A. M.. Regularity of solutions for singular Schrödinger equations. Rev. Math. Phys. 4 (1992), 95–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kalf, H.. Gauss's theorem and the self-adjointness of Schrödinger operators. Ark. Mat. 18 (1980), 19–47.Google Scholar
10Kalf, H., Schmincke, U.-W., Walter, J. and Wiist, R.. On the spectral theory of Schrödinger and Dirac operators with strongly singular potentials. In Spectral Theory and Differential Equations, ed. Everitt, W. N., Lecture Notes in Mathematics 448, 182–226 (Berlin: Springer, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Karlsson, B.. Selfadjointness of Schrödinger operators (Institut Mittag-Leffler Report 5, 1976).Google Scholar
12Kato, T.. A second look at the essential self-adjointness of the Schrödinger operators. In Physical Reality and Mathematical Description, eds Enz, C. P. and Mehra, J., 193–201 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974).Google Scholar
13Knowles, I.. On the existence of minimal operators for Schrödinger-type differential expressions. Math. Ann. 233 (1978), 221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kreith, K.. Local essential self-adjointness for singular elliptic operators. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 19 (1970), 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Levitan, B. M. and Otelbaev, M.. Conditions for selfadjointness of the Schrödinger and Dirac operators. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 1982, no. 2, 139–56.Google Scholar
16Murtazin, Kh. Kh.. Smoothness of generalized solutions of the Schrödinger equation, and deficiency indices. In Asymptotische Methoden in der Analysis, R. Riegel (Hrsg.), Wissensch. Beitr. 46, 75–84 (Halle (Saale): Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg, 1988 (in Russian)).Google Scholar
17YOrochko, u. B.. A remark on the essential self-adjointness of a Schrödinger operator with a singular potential. Math. Notes 20 (1976), 877–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18YOrochko, u. B.. The hyperbolic equation method in the theory of operators of Schrödinger type with a locally integrable potential. Russian Math. Surveys 43(2) (1988), 51–102.Google Scholar
19Perel'muter, M. A.. Schrödinger operators with form-bounded potentials in LP-spaces. Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. 52 (1990), 151–61.Google Scholar
20Reed, M. and Simon, B.. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II. Fourier Analysis. Self-Adjointness (New York: Academic Press, 1975).Google Scholar
21Rofe-Beketov, F. S.. Non-semibounded differential operators. Teor. Funktsii Funktsional. Anal, i Prilozhen 2 (1966), 178–84 (in Russian).Google Scholar
22Rofe-Beketov, F. S.. Conditions for the self-adjointness of the Schrödinger operator. Math. Notes 8 (1970), 888–94.Google Scholar
23Rofe-Beketov, F. S.. The selfadjointness of elliptic operators and energy type estimates in all of Rn. I. Second Order. J. Soviet Math. 58 (1992), 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Rofe-Beketov, F. S. and Kalf, H.. On the self-adjointness of non-semibounded Schrödinger operators. Matematychni Studii 7 (1997), 53–8 (in Russian).Google Scholar
25Schechter, M.. The spectrum of the Schrödinger operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 312 (1989), 115–28.Google Scholar
26Schechter, M.. Multiplication operators. Canad. J. Math. 41 (1989), 234–49.Google Scholar
27Schmincke, U.-W.. Proofs of Povzner–Wienholtz type theorems on selfadjointness of Schrödinger operators by means of positive eigensolutions. Bull. London Math. Soc. 23 (1991), 263–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Simader, C. G.. Essential self-adjointness of Schrödinger operators bounded from below. Math. Z. 159(1978), 47–50.Google Scholar
29Titchmarsh, E. C.. Eigenfunction expansions associated with second-order differential equations II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958).Google Scholar