Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:36:19.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Dirichlet problem with several volume constraints on the level sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2007

Eugene Stepanov
Affiliation:
Computer Technology Department, Institute of Fine Mechanics and Optics, 14 sablinskaya ul., 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia ([email protected])
Paolo Tilli
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126 Pisa, Italy ([email protected])

Abstract

We consider minimization problems involving the Dirichlet integral under an arbitrary number of volume constraints on the level sets and a generalized boundary condition. More precisely, given a bounded open domain Ω ⊂ Rn with smooth boundary, we study the problem of minimizing ∫Ω |∇u|2 among all those functions uH1 that simultaneously satisfy n-dimensional measure constraints on the level sets of the kind |{u = li}| = αi, i = 1,…, k, and a generalized boundary condition uK. Here, K is a closed convex subset of H1 such that ; the invariance of K under provides that the condition uK actually depends only on the trace of u along ∂Ω.

By a penalization approach, we prove the existence of minimizers and their Hölder continuity, generalizing previous results that are not applicable when a boundary condition is prescribed.

Finally, in the case of just two volume constraints, we investigate the Γ-convergence of the above (rescaled) functionals when the total measure of the two prescribed level sets tends to saturate the whole domain Ω. It turns out that the resulting Γ-limit functional can be split into two distinct parts: the perimeter of the interface due to the Dirichlet energy that concentrates along the jump, and a boundary integral term due to the constraint uK. In the particular case where K = H1 (i.e. when no boundary condition is prescribed), the boundary term vanishes and we recover a previous result due to Ambrosio et al.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)