Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:46:35.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fourier multipliers for Hardy spaces on graded Lie groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2022

Qing Hong
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330022, China ([email protected])
Guorong Hu
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330022, China ([email protected])
Michael Ruzhansky
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics: Analysis, Logic and Discrete Mathematics, Ghent University, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the $H^{p}(G) \rightarrow L^{p}(G)$, $0< p \leq 1$, boundedness of multiplier operators defined via group Fourier transform on a graded Lie group $G$, where $H^{p}(G)$ is the Hardy space on $G$. Our main result extends those obtained in [Colloq. Math. 165 (2021), 1–30], where the $L^{1}(G)\rightarrow L^{1,\infty }(G)$ and $L^{p}(G) \rightarrow L^{p}(G)$, $1< p <\infty$, boundedness of such Fourier multiplier operators were proved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

1. Introduction

Many problems in harmonic analysis and partial differential equations are related to the study of Fourier or spectral multipliers for certain function spaces. We start by recalling the classical Mihlin multiplier theorem. It says that if a function $\sigma (\xi )$ defined on $\mathbb {R}^{n} \backslash \{0\}$ has continuous derivatives up to $(\lfloor n/2\rfloor +1)$-th order, and satisfies

(1.1)\begin{equation} |\partial_{\xi}^{\alpha} \sigma (\xi)| \leq C_\alpha |\xi|^{-|\alpha|} \end{equation}

for all $\xi \in \mathbb {R}^{n} \backslash \{0\}$ and all multi-indices $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$ with length $|\alpha | \leq \lfloor n/2\rfloor +1$, then the Fourier multiplier operator $T_\sigma$ associated with $\sigma$, initially defined for $f \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R}^{n})$ via

\[ T_\sigma f = \mathcal{F}^{{-}1} (\sigma \widehat{f}), \]

extends to a bounded operator on $L^{p} (\mathbb {R}^{n})$ for all $1< p <\infty$. Hörmander [Reference Hörmander19] improved this result by showing that the regularity condition on $\sigma (\xi )$ could be allowed to be of fractional order. More precisely he proved that if $\sigma \in \mathcal {S}'(\mathbb {R}^{n})$ satisfies

(1.2)\begin{equation} \sup_{t >0} \|\eta ({\cdot}) \sigma (t \cdot)\|_{W^{2}_{s}(\mathbb{R}^{n})} <\infty \end{equation}

for some $s > n/2$, where $\eta$ is a function in $C_0^{\infty }(\mathbb {R}^{n} \backslash \{0\})$ such that $|\eta (\xi )| \geq c >0$ on some annulus $\{r_1 < |\xi | < r_2\}$, then $T_\sigma$ extends to a bounded operator on $L^{p} (\mathbb {R}^{n})$, for all $1< p <\infty$. Here $W^{2}_s(\mathbb {R}^{n})$ denote the Sobolev spaces on $\mathbb {R}^{n}$. It is well known that condition (1.2) is weaker than condition (1.1). Calderón and Torchinsky [Reference Calderón and Torchinsky4] extended Mihlin and Hörmander's multiplier theorem to the case $0< p \leq 1$, proving that if $\sigma$ satisfies (1.2) for some $s> n(1/p-1/2)$, then $T_\sigma$ is bounded on the Hardy space $H^{p}(\mathbb {R}^{n})$.

Multipliers for Lebesgue or Hardy spaces have also been studied extensively in the context of Lie groups. For spectral multipliers on Lie groups associated to one (or several) operators such as a sub-Laplacian, see, for example, [Reference Alexopoulos1, Reference Christ5, Reference Hebisch and Zienkiewicz15, Reference Hulanicki and Stein18, Reference Martini and Müller21Reference Mauceri and Meda23] and the references therein. Note that the optimality of a Mihlin-Hörmander condition in terms of the topological or homogeneous dimensions for spectral multipliers on stratified groups is a very difficult problem which has so far only been solved in the case of $2$-step [Reference Hebisch and Zienkiewicz15, Reference Martini and Müller21, Reference Martini and Müller22, Reference Müller and Stein24]. Concerning Fourier multipliers on Lie groups, to our best knowledge, the first work was done by Coifman and Weiss in [Reference Coifman and Weiss6], where they studied the Fourier multipliers of $SU(2)$, see also [Reference Coifman and Weiss7]. After that, investigations of Fourier multipliers on compact Lie groups have been focused on the central multipliers [Reference Strichartz28Reference Weiss30], until the appearance of the recent works of the third-named author and Wirth [Reference Ruzhansky and Wirth26, Reference Ruzhansky and Wirth27] and Fischer [Reference Fischer10]. The rest of the literature concerning Fourier multipliers on Lie groups is restricted to the motion group [Reference Rubin25] and to the Heisenberg group [Reference Bagchi2, Reference De Michele and Mauceri8, Reference Lin20].

Recently, Fischer and the third-named author [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky11] investigated Fourier multipliers on graded Lie groups. One of their main results is the following Mihlin-type Fourier multiplier theorem for $L^{p}$ spaces on graded Lie groups. (Basic concepts concerning graded Lie groups and representation theory, and the definition of difference operators will be recalled in § 2.)

Theorem A (see [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky11, Theorem 1.1]). Let $G$ be a graded Lie group with homogeneous dimension $Q$. Let $\sigma =\{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$ be a measurable field of operators in $L^{\infty }(\widehat {G})$. Assume that there exist a positive Rockland operator $\mathcal {R}$ (of homogeneous degree $\nu$) and an integer $N > Q/2$ divisible by the dilation weights $v_1,\,\cdots,\, v_n$ (see § 2 for their definition) such that

(1.3)\begin{equation} \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}} \big\| \Delta^{\alpha}\sigma \ \pi(\mathcal{R})^{\frac{[\alpha]}{\nu}} \big\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_\pi)} <\infty \end{equation}

and

(1.4)\begin{equation} \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}} \big\|\pi(\mathcal{R})^{\frac{[\alpha]}{\nu}} \ \Delta^{\alpha}\sigma \big\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_\pi)} <\infty, \end{equation}

hold for all $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$ with $[\alpha ] \leq N$. Then the Fourier multiplier operator $T_{\sigma }$ defined via

(1.5)\begin{equation} \mathcal{F}_G (T_\sigma f)(\pi) = \sigma(\pi)\widehat{f}(\pi) \end{equation}

is of weak type $(1,\,1)$, and is bounded on $L^{p} (G)$ for all $1 < p <\infty$.

Examining the proof of theorem A (given in [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky11]), we find that the condition (1.3) is sufficient to give the weak $(1,\,1)$ estimate of $T_\sigma$. The latter along with the $L^{2}(G)$-boundedness of $T_\sigma$ (which follows from the Plancherel theorem) and an interpolation argument yields the $L^{p}(G)$-boundedness of $T_\sigma$ for $1 < p \leq 2$. Note that $T^{\ast }_\sigma = T_{\sigma ^{\ast }}$, where $\sigma ^{\ast } = \{\sigma (\pi )^{\ast },\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$, and that if $\sigma$ satisfies (1.4) then $\sigma ^{\ast }$ satisfies (1.3). Hence, if $\sigma$ satisfies (1.3) and (1.4), then both $T_\sigma$ and $T_\sigma ^{\ast }$ are bounded on $L^{p}(G)$ for $1 < p \leq 2$, which implies that $T_\sigma$ is bounded on $L^{p}(G)$ for all $1 < p < \infty$.

The purpose of the present paper is to extend theorem A to the case $0< p \leq 1$ by investigating the $H^{p}(G) \rightarrow L^{p}(G)$ boundedness of $T_\sigma$, where $H^{p}(G)$ is the Hardy space on $G$. Our main results is the following

Theorem 1.1 Let $G$ be a graded Lie group with homogeneous dimension $Q$. Let $\sigma =\{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$ be a measurable field of operators in $L^{\infty }(\widehat {G})$. Let $0< p \leq 1$. Assume that there exist a positive Rockland operator $\mathcal {R}$ (of homogeneous degree $\nu$) and an integer $N > Q(1/p-1/2)$ divisible by the dilation weights $v_1,\,\cdots,\, v_n$ such that

\[ \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}} \big\| \Delta^{\alpha}\sigma \ \pi(\mathcal{R})^{\frac{[\alpha]}{\nu}} \big\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_\pi)} <\infty \]

holds for all $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$ with $[\alpha ] \leq N,$ Then the Fourier multiplier operator $T_{\sigma }$ defined by (1.5) is bounded from $H^{p} (G)$ to $L^{p}(G)$.

Some remarks concerning theorem 1.1 are in order.

  1. (1) Taking $p =1$ in theorem 1.1, we have the $H^{1}(G) \rightarrow L^{1}(G)$ boundedness of $T_\sigma$, under the assumption that $\sigma$ satisfies (1.3) for some integer $N > Q/2$ which is divisible by the dilation weights $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$. Thus (by interpolation) our result also implies the $L^{p}(G)$-boundedness of $T_\sigma$ stated in theorem A under the same assumptions.

  2. (2) In the abelian Euclidean setting, that is, $(\mathbb {R}^{n},\, +)$ with the usual isotropic dilation with $\mathcal {R}$ being the Laplace operator, (1.3) is equivalent to (1.4), and each of them reduces to (1.1). Indeed, the Euclidean abelian setting, all the dilations weights $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$ are equal to $1$, and $\pi (\mathcal {R})$ reduces to $|\xi |^{2}$, where $\xi$ is the (Fourier) dual variable.

  3. (3) As we mentioned before, the optimality of the Mihlin–Hörmander condition for multipliers on Lie groups is a very deep problem. It is known that on any 2-step stratified group the sufficient and necessary condition for $L^{p}$-boundedness of a spectral multiplier $F(\mathcal {\mathcal {L}})$ (where $\mathcal {L}$ is a sub-Laplaican) is that $F$ satisfies a scale-invariant smoothness condition of order $s > n/2$, where $n$ is the topological dimension of the group (see [Reference Martini and Müller22]). It is natural to ask whether the condition $N > Q (1/ p -1/2)$ in theorem 1.1 can be replaced by $N > n(1/p -1/2)$. However, we do not indent to study this problem in the present paper.

To prove theorem 1.1 we shall mainly use an atomic decomposition of $H^{p}(G)$, the Littlewood–Paley decomposition, and a Taylor formula with integral remainder on homogeneous groups which is due to Bonfiglioli [Reference Bonfiglioli3]. Hulanicki's theorem will also play an important role in our proof.

This paper is organized as follows. In § 2, we recall basic notions concerning graded Lie groups, basic representation theory, the group Fourier transform, Rockland operators and difference operators. In § 3, we recall some basic facts about Hardy spaces on graded Lie groups, including their atomic decomposition. The proof of our main theorem will be given in § 4.

Notation. We use $\mathbb {N}_{0}$ to denote the set of all nonnegative integers. For a nonnegative number $s$, we denote by $\lfloor s \rfloor$ the largest integer less than or equal to $s$. If $\mathcal {H}_1$ and $\mathcal {H}_2$ are two Hilbert spaces, we denote by $\mathscr {L}(\mathcal {H}_1,\, \mathcal {H}_2)$ the Banach space of the bounded linear operators from $\mathcal {H}_1$ to $\mathcal {H}_2$. When $\mathcal {H}_1 = \mathcal {H}_2 = \mathcal {H}$ then we write $\mathscr {L} (\mathcal {H}_1,\, \mathcal {H}_2) = \mathscr {L}(\mathcal {H})$. The letter $C$ will denote positive constants, which are independent of the main variables involved and whose value may vary at every occurrence. By writing $f \lesssim g$ we mean that $f \leq Cg$. If $f \lesssim g$ and $g \lesssim f$, we also write $f \sim g$.

2. Preliminaries

2.1 Graded Lie groups and their homogeneous structure

A Lie group $G$ is said to be graded if it is connected and simply connected, and its Lie algebra $\mathfrak {g}$ is endowed with a vector space decomposition $\mathfrak {g}=\oplus _{k =1}^{\infty } \mathfrak {g}_k$ (where all but finitely many of the $\mathfrak {g}_{k}$'s are $\{0\}$) such that $[\mathfrak {g}_{k},\, \mathfrak {g}_{k'}]\subset \mathfrak {g}_{k + k'}$ for all $k,\, k' \in \mathbb {N}$. Such a group is necessarily nilpotent, and the exponential map $\exp : \mathfrak {g} \rightarrow G$ is a diffeomorphism. Examples of graded Lie groups include the Euclidean space $\mathbb {R}^{n}$, the Heisenberg group $\mathbb {H}^{n}$ and, more generally, all stratified Lie groups.

We choose and fix a basis $\{X_1,\, \cdots,\, X_n\}$ of $\mathfrak {g}$, so that it is adapted to the gradation, i.e., $\{X_1,\, \cdots,\, X_{n_1}\}$ (possibly $\emptyset$) is a basis of $\mathfrak {g}_1$, $\{X_{n_1 +1},\, \cdots,\, X_{n_1 + n_2}\}$ (possibly $\emptyset$) is a basis of $\mathfrak {g}_2$, and so on. Via the map

(2.1)\begin{align} \mathbb{R}^{n} \ni (x_1, \cdots, x_n) \mapsto \exp(x_1 X_1 + \cdots + x_n X_n) \equiv x\in G, \end{align}

each point $(x_1,\, \cdots,\, x_n) \in \mathbb {R}^{n}$ is identified with the point $x \in G$. This map takes the Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb {R}^{n}$ to a bi-invariant Haar measure $\mu$ on $G$. We denote the group identity of $G$ by $e$.

The Lie algebra $\mathfrak {g}$ is equipped with a natural family of dilations $\{\delta _r\}_{r>0}$ which are linear mappings from $\mathfrak {g}$ to $\mathfrak {g}$ determined by

\[ \delta_r X= r^{k} X \quad \mbox{ for } X \in \mathfrak{g}_k \]

For each $j \in \{1,\, \cdots,\, n\}$, let $v_j$ be the unique positive integer such that $X_j \in \mathfrak {g}_{v_j}$. Then we have $\delta _r X_j = r^{v_j} X_j$, $j =1,\, \cdots,\, n$. The associated group dilation is given by

\[ \delta_r x = (r^{v_1}x_1, \cdots, r^{v_n} x_n), \]

for $x = (x_1,\, \cdots,\, x_n) \in G$ and $r>0$. The integers $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$ are referred to as weights of the dilations $\{\delta _t\}_{t>0}$, and the positive integer

\[ Q:= \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} k (\dim \mathfrak{g}_k )=\sum_{j=1}^{n} v_j \]

is called the homogeneous dimension of $G$.

A homogeneous quasi-norm on G is a continuous function $x\rightarrow |x|$ from $G$ to $[0,\, \infty )$ which vanishes only at $e$ and satisfies that $|x^{-1}| = |x|$ and $|\delta _r x | = r|x|$ for all $x \in G$ and $r > 0$. An example of homogeneous quasi-norm on $G$ is given by

(2.2)\begin{equation} |x|_\kappa = \left(\sum_{j=1}^{n} x_j^{2\kappa /v_j} \right)^{1/(2\kappa)}, \end{equation}

where $\kappa$ is the smallest common multiple to the weights $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$. Any two homogeneous quasi-norms on $G$ are equivalent (see [Reference Folland and Stein14]). Henceforth we fix a homogenous quasi-norm $|\cdot |$ on $G$. It satisfies a quasi-triangle inequality: there exists a constant $\gamma \geq 1$ such that

(2.3)\begin{equation} |xy| \leq \gamma (|x| + |y|) \end{equation}

for all $x,\,y \in G$.

There is an analogue of polar coordinates on homogeneous groups with the homogeneous dimension $Q$ replacing the topological dimension $n$, see [Reference Folland and Stein14]:

\[ \forall f \in L^{1} (G) \quad \int_G f(x)d\mu(x) = \int_0^{\infty} \int_{\mathfrak{S}} f(\delta_r y)r^{Q-1}d\sigma (y)dr, \]

where $d\sigma$ is a (unique) positive Borel measure on the unit sphere $\mathfrak {S} := \{x \in G: |x| =1\}$. This implies that for $0< r < R < \infty$ and $\theta \in \mathbb {R}$,

(2.4)\begin{equation} \int_{r \leq |x| \leq R} |x|^{\theta -Q}d\mu(x) = \begin{cases} C \theta^{{-}1} (R^{\theta} - r^{\theta}) & \mbox{if } \theta \neq 0, \\ C \log(R /r) & \mbox{if } \theta =0. \end{cases} \end{equation}

Consequently, if $\theta >0$ then $|\cdot |^{\theta -Q}$ is integrable near the group identity $e$, and if $\theta <0$ then $|\cdot |^{\theta - Q}$ is integrable near $\infty$.

Since $G$ has been identified with $\mathbb {R}^{n}$ via the map given in (2.1), functions on $G$ can be viewed as functions on $\mathbb {R}^{n}$, and vise versa. This leads naturally to the notions of test function classes $\mathcal {D}(G)$, $\mathcal {S}(G)$ and the distribution spaces $\mathcal {D}'(G)$, $\mathcal {S}'(G)$. For example, a function $f$ is said to be in the Schwartz class $\mathcal {S}(G)$ if $f \circ \exp$ is a Schwartz function on $\mathbb {R}^{n}$. The coordinate function $G \ni x =(x_1,\, \cdots,\, x_n) \mapsto x_1 \in \mathbb {R}$ is denoted by $x_1$. For a multi-index $\alpha =(\alpha _1,\, \cdots,\, \alpha _n) \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$, we define $x^{\alpha } = x_1^{\alpha _1} \cdots x_n^{\alpha _n}$, as a function on $G$. Similarly, we set $X^{\alpha } = X_1^{\alpha _1} \cdots X_n^{\alpha _n}$ in the universal enveloping Lie algebra $\mathfrak {U}(\mathfrak {g})$ of $\mathfrak {g}$. We shall follow the usual custom of identifying each vector of $\mathfrak {g}$ with a left-invariant vector field on $G$ and, more generally, we identify the universal enveloping Lie algebra of $\mathfrak {g}$ with the left-invariant differential operators. In what follows we keep the same notation for the vectors and the corresponding operators. By the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem, the $X^{\alpha }$'s form a basis for the algebra of the left-invariant differential operators on $G$.

In a canonical way the dilations $\{\delta _r\}_{r>0}$ lead to the notions of homogeneity for functions and operators. For instance the degree of homogeneity of the function $x^{\alpha }$ and the differential operator $X^{\alpha }$ is

\[ [\alpha] : = \sum_{j =1}^{n} v_j \alpha_j. \]

A function $P: G \rightarrow \mathbb {C}$ is called a polynomial, if it is of the form

\[ P(x) =\sum_{\alpha \in \mathbb{N}_0^{n}} c_\alpha x^{\alpha} \]

where all but finitely many of the complex coefficients $c_\alpha$ vanish. The homogeneous degree of the polynomial $P$ is defined as $\max \{[\alpha ]: c_\alpha \neq 0 \}$. For $M \in \mathbb {N}_0$, we set

\[ \mathcal{P}_M := \{\mbox{all polynomials on }G \mbox{ with homogeneous degree } \leq M\}.\hat{} \]

We denote by $\widetilde {X}_1,\, \cdots,\, \widetilde {X}_n$ the corresponding basis for right-invariant vector fields, that is,

\[ \widetilde{X}_j f (x) = \frac{d}{dt} f \big(\exp(tX_j) x\big)\big|_{t=0}, \quad j =1, \cdots, n. \]

Also, for $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$, we set $\widetilde {X}^{\alpha } = \widetilde {X}_1^{\alpha _1} \cdots \widetilde {X}_n^{\alpha _n}$.

If $f$ and $g$ are measurable functions on $G$, then their convolution is defined by

\[ f \ast g (x) = \int_G f(y)g(y^{{-}1}x)d\mu(y) = \int_G f(xy^{{-}1})g(y)d\mu(y), \]

provided that the integrals converge. For any multi-index $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$ and sufficiently good functions $f$ and $g$, we have (see [Reference Folland and Stein14, chapter 1])

(2.5)\begin{equation} X^{\alpha} (f \ast g) = f \ast (X^{\alpha} g), \quad \widetilde{X}^{\alpha} (f \ast g) = (\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} f) \ast g, \quad (X^{\alpha} f) \ast g = f \ast (\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} g). \end{equation}

2.2 Fourier analysis on graded Lie groups

The general theory of representation of Lie groups may be found in [Reference Dixmier and Jellett9]. Here we also refer to [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12] for a description which is more adapted to our particular context.

A representation $\pi$ of a Lie group $G$ on a Hilbert space $\mathcal {H}_{\pi } \neq \{0\}$ is a homomorphism from $G$ into the group of bounded linear operators on $\mathcal {H}_{\pi }$ with bounded inverse. More precisely,

  • for every $x \in G$, the linear mapping $\pi (x) : \mathcal {H}_{\pi } \rightarrow \mathcal {H}_{\pi }$ is bounded and has bounded inverse;

  • for every $x,\, y \in G$, we have $\pi (xy )=\pi (x) \pi (y)$.

A representation $\pi$ of $G$ is called irreducible if it has no closed invariant subspaces. $\pi$ is called unitary if $\pi (x)$ is unitary for every $x \in G$, and is called strongly continuous if the mapping $\pi : G \rightarrow \mathscr {L}(\mathcal {H_{\pi }})$ is continuous with respect to the strong operator topology in $\mathscr {L}(\mathcal {H}_{\pi })$. Two representations $\pi _1$ and $\pi _2$ are said to be equivalent if there exists a bounded linear mapping $A: \mathcal {H}_{\pi _1} \rightarrow \mathcal {H}_{\pi _2}$ between their representation spaces with a bounded inverse such that the relation $A \pi _1 (x) = \pi _2 (x)A$ holds for all $x \in G$. In this case we write $\pi _1 \sim \pi _2$, and denote their equivalence class by $[\pi _1] = [\pi _2]$. The set of all equivalence classes of strongly continuous irreducible unitary representations of $G$ is called the unitary dual of $G$ and is denoted by $\widehat {G}$. In what follows, we will identify one representation $\pi$ with its equivalent class $[\pi ]$.

For a unitary representation of $G$, the corresponding infinitesimal representation which acts on the universal enveloping algebra $\mathfrak {U}(\mathfrak {g})$ of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak {g}$ is still denoted by $\pi$. This is characterized by its action on $\mathfrak {g}$:

\[ \pi (X) = \partial_{t =0} \pi (e^{tX}), \quad X \in \mathfrak{g}. \]

The infinitesimal action acts on the space $\mathcal {H}_{\pi }^{\infty }$ of smooth vectors, that is, the space of vectors $v \in \mathcal {H}_{\pi }$ such that the function $G \ni x \mapsto \pi (x) v \in \mathcal {H}_{\pi }$ is of class $C^{\infty }$.

The Fourier coefficients or group Fourier transform of a function $f \in L^{1} (G)$ at $\pi \in \widehat {G}$ is defined by

\[ \mathcal{F}_G f (\pi) \equiv \widehat{f}(\pi) \equiv \pi (f) := \int_G f(x) \pi(x)^{{\ast}} d\mu(x). \]

It is readily seen that

\[ \|\widehat{f}(\pi)\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_\pi)} \leq \|f\|_{L^{1} (G)}. \]

For $f,\, g \in L^{1} (G)$, we also have

\[ \widehat{f \ast g} (\pi) = \widehat{g}(\pi) \widehat{f}(\pi). \]

There exists a unique positive Borel measure $\widehat {\mu }$ on $\widehat {G}$, called the Plancherel measure, such that for any continuous function $f$ on $G$ with compact support, one has

\[ \int_G |f(x)|^{2} d\mu(x) = \int_{\widehat{G}} \|\mathcal{F}_G f (\pi)\|_{HS(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})}^{2} d\widehat{\mu}(\pi), \]

where $\|\cdot \|_{HS(\mathcal {H}_{\pi })}$ denotes the Hilbert–Schmidt norm on the space $HS(\mathcal {H}_\pi ) \sim \mathcal {H}_{\pi } \otimes \mathcal {H}_{\pi }^{\ast }$ of Hilbert–Schmidt operators on the Hilbert space $\mathcal {H}_{\pi }$. Since $L^{1}(G) \cap L^{2}(G)$ is dense in $L^{2}(G)$, the Fourier transform $\mathcal {F}_G$ extends to a unitary operator from $L^{2}(G)$ onto $L^{2} (\widehat {G})$.

By the general theory on locally compact unimodular groups of type I (see e.g. [Reference Dixmier and Jellett9]), if $T$ is an $L^{2}$-bounded operator on $G$ which commutes with left-translations, then there exists a field of bounded operators $\widehat {T}(\pi )$ such that for all $f \in L^{2} (G)$,

\[ \mathcal{F}_G (Tf)(\pi) = \widehat{T} (\pi) \widehat{f}(\pi) \quad \text{a.e. } \pi \in \widehat{G}. \]

Moreover, we have

\[ \|T\|_{\mathscr{L}(L^{2}(G))} = \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}} \|\widehat{T}(\pi)\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_\pi)}, \]

where the supremum here is understood as the essential supremum with respect to the Plancherel measure $\mu$. Conversely, given any $\sigma =\{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\} \in L^{\infty } (\widehat {G})$, there is a corresponding operator $T_\sigma$ given by

\[ \mathcal{F}_G (T_\sigma f) (\pi) = \sigma(\pi) \widehat{f}(\pi), \quad f \in L^{2} (G). \]

By the Plancherel theorem, $T_\sigma$ is bounded on $L^{2}(G)$ with $\|T_\sigma \|_{\mathscr {L}(L^{2}(G))} =\|\sigma \|_{L^{\infty } (\widehat {G})}$.

If $\pi$ is a unitary irreducible representation of $G$ and $r >0$, we define $r \cdot \pi$ to be the unitary irreducible representation such that

\[ r \cdot \pi (x) = \pi (\delta_r x), \quad x \in G. \]

2.3 Rockland operators

Let $G$ be a graded Lie group. A left-invariant differential operator $\mathcal {R}$ on $G$ is called a Rockland operator if it is homogeneous of positive degree and for each unitary irreducible non-trivial representation $\pi$ of $G$, the operator $\pi (\mathcal {R})$ is injective on $\mathcal {H}_{\pi }^{\infty }$. Rockland operators may be defined on any homogeneous group, however it turns out that the existence of a Rockland operator on a homogeneous group implies that (the Lie algebra of) the group admits a gradation. This is the reason why we and the authors in [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky11] consider the setting of graded Lie groups. On any graded Lie group $G$, the operator

\[ \sum_{j =1}^{n} ({-}1)^{\frac{\nu_0}{v_j}} c_j X_j^{2 \frac{\nu_0}{v_j}} \]

with $c_j >0$ is a Rockland operator of homogeneous degree 2$\nu _0$ if $\nu _0$ is any common multiple of $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$.

We will mainly consider positive Rockland operators. A Rockland operator $\mathcal {R}$ is said to be positive, if

\[ \int_G \mathcal{R}f (x)\overline{f(x)}d\mu(x) \geq 0 \]

for all $f \in \mathcal {S}(G)$. If a Rockland operator $\mathcal {R}$ is positive then $\mathcal {R}$ and $\pi (\mathcal {R})$ admit self-adjoint extensions on $L^{2} (G)$ and $\mathcal {H}_{\pi }$, respectively. We use the same notation for their self-adjoint extensions. By the spectral theory, we have

\[ \mathcal{R} = \int_0^{\infty} \lambda dE_{\mathcal{R}}(\lambda)\quad \mbox{and} \quad \pi(\mathcal{R}) = \int_0^{\infty} \lambda dE_{\pi(\mathcal{R})}(\lambda), \]

where $E_{\mathcal {R}}(\lambda )$ (resp. $E_{\pi (\mathcal {R})} (\lambda )$) is the resolution of the identity associated to $\mathcal {R}$ (resp. $\pi (\mathcal {R})$).

For any bounded Borel function $\varphi$ on $[0,\,\infty )$, the operator

\[ \varphi(\mathcal{R}) = \int_{0}^{\infty} \varphi(\lambda)dE_{\mathcal{R}}(\lambda) \]

is bounded on $L^{2}(G)$, and commutes with left translations. Thus, by the Schwartz kernel theorem, there exists a distribution $K_{\varphi (\mathcal {R})} \in \mathcal {S}'(G)$ such that

\[ \varphi(\mathcal{R})f =f \ast K_{\varphi(\mathcal{R})}, \quad \forall f \in \mathcal{S}(G). \]

Note that the point $\lambda =0$ may be neglected in the spectral resolution, since the projection measure of $\{0\}$ is zero (see [Reference Hulanicki, Jenkins and Ludwig17] or [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12, remark 4.2.8]). Consequently we should regard $\varphi$ as a function on $(0,\, \infty )$ rather than on $[0,\,\infty )$.

We now recall Hulanicki's theorem, which will play an important role in the proof of our main result.

Theorem 2.1 Hulanicki [Reference Hulanicki16]

Let $G$ be a graded Lie groups and let $\mathcal {R}$ be a positive Rockland operator on $G$. For any $M_1 \in \mathbb {N}$ and $M_2 \geq 0,$ there exist $C =C(M_1,\,M_2) >0$ and $k = k(M_1,\, M_2),\, k'=k'(M_1,\,M_2) \in \mathbb {N}_0$ such that, for any $\varphi \in C^{k} (0,\, \infty ),$ the convolution kernel $K_{\varphi (\mathcal {R})}$ of $\varphi (\mathcal {R})$ satisfies

\[ \sum_{[\alpha] \leq M_1} \int_G |X^{\alpha} K_{\varphi(\mathcal{R})} (x)|(1+|x|_\kappa)^{M_2}d\mu(x) \leq C \sup_{\substack{\lambda\in (0,\infty) \\ \ell \in \{0,1,\cdots, k\}\\ \ell' \in \{0,1,\cdots, k'\}}} (1+\lambda)^{\ell'}\left|\frac{d^{\ell}}{d\lambda^{\ell}}\varphi(\lambda) \right|. \]

The same result with the right-invariant vector fields $\widetilde {X}_j$'s instead of the left-invariant vector fields $X_j$'s also holds.

Corollary 2.2 Let $\mathcal {R}$ be a positive Rockland operator on a stratified Lie group $G$. If $\varphi$ is a function on $(0,\, \infty )$ such that $\varphi = \widetilde {\varphi }|_{(0,\infty )}$ for some $\widetilde {\varphi } \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R}),$ then $K_{\varphi (\mathcal {R})} \in \mathcal {S}(G)$.

2.4 Difference operators

The Mihlin condition (1.1) is formulated in terms of the derivatives with respect to the Fourier variable $\xi$. However, for a field $\sigma =\{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$ of operators, there is no direct way to define an analogue of derivatives with respect to the Fourier variable $\pi$. To generalize the symbolic conditions to the setting of graded Lie groups, Fischer and Ruzhansky [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12] introduced the so-called difference operators, whose definition we now recall.

For $a,\, b \in \mathbb {R}$, we denote by $\mathscr {L}_L (L_a^{2}(G),\, L_b^{2}(G))$ the subspace of all $T \in \mathscr {L}(L^{2}_a(G),\, L^{2}_b(G))$ which are left-invariant. Here $L^{2}_a(G)$ is the Bessel potential space (fractional Sobolev space) defined in [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky13]. Define

\begin{align*} \mathcal{K}_{a,b} (G):= \Big\{K \in \mathcal{S}'(G): \ & \mbox{the operator } \mathcal{S}(G) \ni f \mapsto f \ast K \mbox{ extends to} \\ & \mbox{a bounded operator from } L_a^{2}(G) \mbox{ to } L_b^{2}(G)) \Big\} \end{align*}

and define $L_{a,b}^{\infty }(\widehat {G})$ to be the space of all fields $\sigma = \{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$ such that

\[ \|\sigma\|_{L^{\infty}_{a,b}(\widehat{G})} := \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}} \|\pi(I +\mathcal{R})^{\frac{b}{\nu}} \sigma(\pi)\pi(I +\mathcal{R})^{-\frac{a}{\nu}} \|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})} <\infty. \]

From [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12, proposition 5.1.24] we see that, if $\sigma \in L^{\infty }_{a,b}(\widehat {G})$ then the Fourier multiplier operator $T_{\sigma }$ corresponding to $\sigma$ belongs to $\mathscr {L}_L (L_a^{2} (G),\, L_b^{2}(G))$ with

\[ \|T_{\sigma}\|_{\mathscr{L}(L_a^{2} (G), L_b^{2} (G))} = \|\sigma\|_{L^{\infty}_{a,b}(\widehat{G})}. \]

Conversely, if $T \in \mathscr {L}_L (L_a^{2}(G),\, L_b^{2}(G))$, then there exists a unique $\sigma \in L^{\infty }_{a,b}(\widehat {G})$ such that

\[ \mathcal{F}_G (T f)(\pi) = \sigma(\pi) \widehat{f}(\pi), \quad f \in L^{2}(G). \]

In this case, denoting by $K \in \mathcal {K}_{a,b}(G)$ the convolution kernel of $T$, we define

\[ \mathcal{F}_G K = \sigma \quad \mbox{and} \quad \mathcal{F}_G^{{-}1}\sigma = K. \]

This extends the definition of Fourier transform to the space $\mathcal {K}_{a,b} (G)$. See [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12, definition 5.1.25].

For $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n}$ and $\sigma =\{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}\in L^{\infty }_{a,b}(\widehat {G})$, the difference operator $\Delta ^{\alpha }$ acting on $\sigma$ is defined according to the formula (see [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12, definition 5.2.1])

\[ \Delta^{\alpha} \sigma (\pi) = \mathcal{F}_G (q_\alpha \mathcal{F}_G^{{-}1}\sigma)(\pi) \quad \mbox{for a.e. } \pi \in \widehat{G}, \]

where $q_\alpha (x) =x^{\alpha }$. Analogously to the derivatives in the Euclidean setting, the operator $\Delta ^{\alpha }$ satisfies the Lebnitz rule [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky12, section 5.2.2]:

(2.6)\begin{equation} \Delta^{\alpha} (\sigma \tau) =\sum_{\alpha_1 +\alpha_2 =\alpha} C_{\alpha_1, \alpha_2} \Delta^{\alpha_1} (\sigma) \Delta^{\alpha_2} (\tau), \quad \sigma, \tau \in L^{\infty}_{a,b}(\widehat{G}). \end{equation}

3. Hardy spaces on graded Lie groups

A comprehensive theory of Hardy spaces on general homogeneous groups was built by Folland and Stein [Reference Folland and Stein14]. Since all graded Lie groups are homogeneous, the theory in [Reference Folland and Stein14] applies to our setting.

In what follows, $G$ is always a graded Lie group with homogeneous dimension $Q$.

3.1 Definition of Hardy spaces on $G$

We first introduce some maximal functions. Given a function $\Phi \in \mathcal {S}(G)$, we defined the nontangential maximal function $M_\Phi f$ and the radial maximal function $M_\Phi ^{0} f$ of $f \in \mathcal {S}'(G)$ by

\[ M_\Phi f (x) : = \sup_{|x^{{-}1}y| < t} |f \ast \Phi_t (y)| \quad \mbox{and} \quad M_\Phi^{0} f (x): = \sup_{t >0 } |f \ast \Phi_t (x)|, \]

respectively, where $\Phi _t (x):= t^{-Q} \Phi (\delta _{t^{-1}}x)$. We then define the grand maximal function $M_{(N)}f$ for each $N\in \mathbb {N}$ by

\[ M_{(N)} f(x) := \sup_{\Phi \in \mathcal{S}(G), \|\Phi\|_{(N)} \leq 1} M_\Phi f(x), \]

where

\[ \|\Phi\|_{(N)}: = \sup_{|\alpha| \leq N, x \in G} (1 + |x|_\kappa)^{(N+1)(Q+1)} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Phi (x)|. \]

Moreover, given $N \in \mathbb {N}$, we define the grand maximal function $M_{(N)}f$ of $f \in \mathcal {S}'(G)$ by

Definition 3.1 For $0< p<\infty$, the Hardy space $H^{p}(G)$ is defined as

\[ H^{p} (G): = \big\{f \in \mathcal{S}'(G) : M_{(N_p)} f <\infty\big\}, \]

where

\[ N_p := \min\{[\alpha]: \alpha \in \mathbb{N}_0^{n} \mbox{ with } [\alpha] > Q (1/p-1)\}. \]

The quasi-norm on $H^{p}(G)$ is defined by

\[ \|f\|_{H^{p} (G)}: = \|M_{(N_p)} f\|_{L^{p} (G)}. \]

The Hardy spaces $H^{p} (G)$, initially defined via grand maximal function, can be characterized by radial maximal function and nontangential maximal function equivalently. To recall these maximal characterizations, we need the notion of commutative approximate identities introduced in [Reference Folland and Stein14]. A commutative approximate identity on $G$ is a function $\Phi \in \mathcal {S}(G)$ such that $\int _{G} \Phi (x)dx =1$ and $\Phi _s \ast \Phi _t =\Phi _t \ast \Phi _s$ for all $s,\, t >0$. On a graded Lie group it is easy to construct a commutative approximate identity. Indeed, if $\mathcal {R}$ is a positive Rockland operator on $G$, and $\varphi \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R})$ such that $\varphi (0) =1$, then the convolution kernel of the operator $\varphi (\mathcal {R})$ is a commutative approximate identity.

Proposition 3.2 [Reference Folland and Stein14, corollary 4.17]

Suppose $0< p <\infty$ and $\Phi$ is a commutative approximate identity. Then for $f \in \mathcal {S}'(G),$ the following are equivalent:

  1. (i) $M_{\Phi }^{0} f \in L^{p}(G);$

  2. (ii) $M_{\Phi } f \in L^{p}(G);$

  3. (iii) $M_{(N_p)} f \in L^{p}(G)$.

Moreover, we have

\[ \|M_{\Phi}^{0} f\|_{L^{p}(G)} \sim \|M_{\Phi}f\|_{L^{p}(G)} \sim \|M_{(N_p)}f\|_{L^{p} (G)} \]

with the implicit constants depending only on $\Phi$ and $p$.

Remark 3.3 If $1< p <\infty$, the spaces $H^{p} (G)$ and $L^{p}(G)$ coincide with equivalent norms. See [Reference Folland and Stein14, p. 75].

3.2 Atomic decomposition

Atomic decomposition is a very useful tool for the study of boundedness of operators on Hardy spaces. Analogously to the Euclidean case, Hardy spaces on graded Lie groups also admit an atomic decomposition, which we now recall. See [Reference Folland and Stein14] for more details.

A triplet $(p,\,q,\,M)$ is said to be admissible, if $0< p \leq 1 \leq q \leq \infty$, $p \neq q$ and $M \in \mathbb {N}_0$ with $M \geq \max \big \{[\alpha ]: \alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n} \mbox { with } [\alpha ] \leq Q(1/p-1)\big \}$.

Definition 3.4 Given an admissible triplet $(p,\,q,\,M)$, we say that a function $a$ on $G$ is a $(p,\,q,\,M)$-atom, if it is a compactly supported $L^{q}$ function such that

  1. (i) there is a ball $B$ such that $\operatorname {supp} a \subset \overline {B}$ and $\|a\|_{L^{q}} \leq \mu (B)^{1/q - 1/p}$;

  2. (ii) for every $P\in \mathcal {P}_M$, $\int _G a(x)P(x)d\mu (x) =0$.

The atomic decomposition of $H^{p} (G)$ can be stated as follows.

Proposition 3.5 [Reference Folland and Stein14]

Let $(p,\,q,\,M)$ be an admissible triplet. Then there is a constant $c_1>0$ such that for all any $(p,\,q,\,M)$-atom $a,$ one has

\[ \|a\|_{H^{p} (G)} \leq c_1. \]

Conversely, given any $f \in H^{p} (G)$, there exist a sequence $\{a_j\}_{j=1}^{\infty }$ of $(p,\,q,\,M)$-atoms and a sequence $\{\lambda _j\}_{j=1}^{\infty }$ of complex numbers such that $f = \sum _{j=1}^{\infty }\lambda _j a_j$ with convergence in $\mathcal {S}'(G)$ and

\[ \left(\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|\lambda_j|^{p}\right)^{1/p} \leq c_2 \|f\|_{H^{p} (G)}, \]

where $c_2$ is a constant independent of $f$.

4. Proof of main result

We need the following Taylor's formula with integral remainder on homogeneous groups, due to Bonfiglioli (see [Reference Bonfiglioli3, theorem 2]). Note that in [Reference Bonfiglioli3] it is assumed that $v_1 =1$, in which case one has $\lceil M \rfloor = M$.

Lemma 4.1 Suppose $f \in C^{M+1}(G)$ for some $M \in \mathbb {N}_0$. Let $y \mapsto P_{x,M}^{f}(y)$ denote the right Taylor polynomial of $f$ at $x$ of homogeneous degree $M$. Then there exists a positive group constant $C_M$ such that

\begin{align*} f(yx) -P^{f}_{x,M} (y)& = \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M \rfloor \\ [\alpha] \geq M +1}} \widetilde{X}^{\alpha} f (x) \left(\sum_{\beta: [\beta] = [\alpha]} C_{\alpha,\beta} y^{\beta} \right)\\ & \quad + \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}\left(\sum_{\beta: [\beta] = [\alpha]} C_{\alpha,\beta}' y^{\beta} \right)\int_0^{1} (\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} f)(y_{(t)} x) \frac{(1-t)^{M}}{M!}dt, \end{align*}

where

\[ y_{(t)}:= \exp\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n} ty_j X_j\right) \equiv (ty_1, \cdots, ty_n), \]

$\lceil M\rfloor := \max \{|\alpha |: \alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n} \mbox { with } [\alpha ] \leq M\},$ and $C_{\alpha,\beta },$ $C_{\alpha,\beta }'$ are constants.

Lemma 4.2 Suppose that $\sigma = \{\sigma (\pi ),\, \pi \in \widehat {G}\}$ is a measurable field of operators, $\mathcal {R}$ is positive Rockland operator (of homogeneous degree $\nu$), and $N$ is an integer, all of which satisfy the hypothesis of theorem 1.1. Let $\varphi \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R})$ such that $\operatorname {supp} \varphi \subset [2^{-\nu },\, 2^{\nu }]$ and

\[ \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\varphi (2^{-\nu j}\lambda) =1 \quad \forall \lambda \in (0, \infty). \]

Let $\sigma _j(\pi ):= \sigma (2^{j} \cdot \pi )\varphi (\pi (\mathcal {R}))$ and $K_j := \mathcal {F}_G^{-1} \sigma _j$ for $j \in \mathbb {Z}$. Then for any $\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n},$ there exits a constant $C$ (depending on $\alpha$) such that

(4.1)\begin{equation} \int_G (1 + |x|)^{2N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} K_j(x)|^{2}d\mu(x) \leq C. \end{equation}

Proof. Let $\psi \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R})$ such that $\psi =1$ on $[2^{-\nu },\, 2^{\nu }]$. Then $\varphi (\lambda ) = \varphi (\lambda ) \psi (\lambda )$ for all $\lambda \in \mathbb {R}$. Consequently

\[ \sigma_j (\pi) = \sigma_j (\pi) \psi(\pi (\mathcal{R}) ). \]

Letting $\Psi$ be the convolution kernel of $\psi (\mathcal {R})$, it follows that

\[ \widetilde{X}^{\alpha} K_{j } (x) = \widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \big( \Psi \ast K_j \big) (x) =(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Psi ) \ast K_{j} (x), \]

where we used (2.5). From the quasi-triangle inequality (2.3) we have

\[ (1+ |x|)^{N} \lesssim (1 + |xy^{{-}1}|)^{N} (1 + |y|)^{N}, \]

which yields

\[ (1+ |x|)^{N} \big|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Psi) \ast K_j (x) \big| \lesssim \big[(1+|\cdot|)^{N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Psi|\big] \ast \big[(1 + |\cdot|)^{N} |K_j|\big] (x) \]

By Hulanicki's theorem (see corollary 2.2), we have $\Psi \in \mathcal {S}(G)$, which implies

\[ (1+|\cdot|)^{N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Psi| \in L^{1} (G). \]

Hence by Young's inequality,

(4.2)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \int_G (1 + |x|)^{2N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} K_j(x)|^{2}d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\lesssim \left\| \big[(1+|\cdot|)^{N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \Psi|\big] \ast \big[(1 + |\cdot|)^{N} |K_j|\big] \right\|_{L^{2}(G)}^{2}\\ & \quad\lesssim \int_{G} (1+ |x|)^{2N}| K_{j}(x)|^{2} d\mu (y)\\ & \quad\sim \int_{G} (1+ |x|_\kappa^{2\kappa})^{N/\kappa}| K_{j}(x)|^{2} d\mu (y), \end{aligned} \end{equation}

where $|\cdot |_\kappa$ is the homogeneous quasi-norm defined by (2.2).

Since $N$ is a common multiple of the dilation weights $v_1,\, \cdots,\, v_n$ and $\kappa$ is the smallest such common multiple, $(1+ |x|_\kappa ^{2\kappa })^{N/\kappa }$ of the form

\[ (1+ |x|_\kappa^{2\kappa})^{N/\kappa} = \sum_{[\beta] \leq N} c_\beta (x^{\beta})^{2}. \]

Inserting this into (4.2), and using the Plancherel theorem and the Lebniz rule (2.6), we have

(4.3)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \int_G (1 + |x|)^{2N} |\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} K_j(x)|^{2}d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\lesssim \sum_{[\beta] \leq N} \left\|\Delta^{\beta} \big[\sigma_{j}(\pi) \varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R})) \big] \right\|_{L^{2}(\widehat{G})} \\ & \quad \lesssim \sum_{[\beta'] + [\beta''] \leq N} \left\|(\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma_{j})(\pi) \Delta^{\beta''}\big[ \varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R}))\big]\right\|_{L^{2}(\widehat{G})}. \end{aligned} \end{equation}

Inserting the powers $\pi (\mathcal {R})^{[\beta '] /\nu }$, each term in the above sum can be estimated as follows:

(4.4)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \left\|(\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma_{j})(\pi) \Delta^{\beta''}\big[ \varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R}))\big]\right\|_{L^{2}(\widehat{G})} \\ & \quad\leq \left\|(\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma_{j})(\pi) \pi(\mathcal{R})^{[\beta'] /\nu} \right\|_{L^{\infty} (\widehat{G})} \left\| \pi(\mathcal{R})^{-[\beta'] /\nu}\Delta^{\beta''}\big[\varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R}))\big] \right\|_{L^{2}(\widehat{G})} \\ & \quad=: E_1 \cdot E_2. \end{aligned} \end{equation}

For the factor $E_1$, we have

(4.5)\begin{align} E_1 & =\sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G} }\left\|(\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma_{j})(\pi) \pi (\mathcal{R})^{[\beta'] /\nu} \right\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})} \nonumber\\ & = \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}}\left\| 2^{j [\beta']} (\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma \big) (2^{j}\cdot\pi) \pi(\mathcal{R})^{[\beta'] /\nu} \right\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})} \nonumber\\ & = \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}}\left\| (\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma \big) (2^{j}\cdot\pi) \big[(2^{j}\cdot\pi)(\mathcal{R})\big]^{[\beta'] /\nu} \right\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})} \nonumber\\ & = \sup_{\pi \in \widehat{G}}\left\| (\Delta^{\beta'} \sigma \big) ( \pi) \big[\pi(\mathcal{R})\big]^{[\beta'] /\nu} \right\|_{\mathscr{L}(\mathcal{H}_{\pi})} \nonumber\\ & \leq C_{\beta'}, \end{align}

where the last inequality follows from the Mihlin-type condition (1.3).

Using Hulanicki's theorem (2.2) and the fact that $\varphi$ vanishes near the origin, one can show that (see the proof of proposition 4.9 in [Reference Fischer and Ruzhansky11] for details)

(4.6)\begin{equation} E_2 = \left\| \pi(\mathcal{R})^{-[\beta'] /\nu}\Delta^{\beta''}\big[\varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R}))\big] \right\|_{L^{2}(\widehat{G})} \leq C_{\beta', \beta''}. \end{equation}

Combining (4.3) through (4.6) yields the desired estimate (4.1).

Now we give the proof of our main result.

Proof Proof of theorem 1.1

Let $0< p \leq 1$ and let $\sigma$, $\mathcal {R}$ and $N$ satisfy the hypothesis of theorem 1.1. We fix an integer $M$ such that

(4.7)\begin{equation} M \geq \max \big\{[\alpha]: \alpha \in \mathbb{N}_0^{n} \mbox{ with } [\alpha] \leq Q(1/p-1)\big\} \end{equation}

and

(4.8)\begin{equation} \frac{Q}{2}+ (M+1) -N >0. \end{equation}

The condition (4.7) means that $(p,\,2,\,M)$ is an admissible triplet. Hence, to prove that $T_\sigma$ is bounded from $H^{p}(G)$ to $L^{p} (G)$, by proposition 3.5 it suffices to show that there exists a constant $C$ such that for an arbitrary $(p,\,2,\,M)$-atom $a$,

(4.9)\begin{equation} \|T_\sigma a\|_{L^{p} (G)} \lesssim 1. \end{equation}

Suppose $a$ is a $(p,\,2,\,M)$-atom associated to a ball $B= B(x_0,\, r)$. Since $T_\sigma$ commutes with left translations, we may assume without loss of generality that $x_0 =e$, i.e., the ball $B$ is centred at the group identity $e$. Let $c$ be a sufficient large positive constant. We write

\begin{align*} \|T_\sigma a\|_{L^{p} (G)}^{p} & = \int_{B(e, cr)}|T_\sigma a (x)|^{p} d\mu(x) + \int_{B(e, cr)^{c}}|T_\sigma a (x)|^{p} d\mu(x) \\ & =:I_1 + I_2. \end{align*}

First we estimate $I_1$. Indeed, by the Plancherel theorem and Hölder's inequality,

(4.10)\begin{equation} I_1 \lesssim \|T_{\sigma} a\|_{L^{2} (G)} ^{p}|B(e, c r)|^{1- \frac{p}{2}} \lesssim \|\sigma\|_{L^{\infty}(\widehat{G})}^{p} \|a\|_{L^{2} (G)} ^{p}|B(e, c r)|^{1- \frac{p}{2}} \lesssim 1. \end{equation}

Next we estimate $I_2$. Choose a function $\varphi \in \mathcal {S}(\mathbb {R})$ such that $\operatorname {supp} \varphi \subset [2^{-\nu },\, 2^{\nu }]$ and

\[ \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\varphi (2^{-\nu j}\lambda) =1 \quad \forall \lambda \in (0, \infty). \]

By the spectral theorem (recalling that $0$ can be neglected in the spectral resolution),

\[ a = \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\varphi (2^{-\nu j}\mathcal{R}) a \quad \mbox{in } L^{2}(G). \]

Consequently (using the $L^{2}$-boundedness of $T_\sigma$) we have

(4.11)\begin{equation} T_\sigma a (x) = \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} T_\sigma \varphi (2^{-\nu j}\mathcal{R}) a (x), \quad \text{a.e. } x \in G. \end{equation}

We set

\begin{align*} \sigma_j (\pi)& := \sigma(2^{j}\cdot \pi)\varphi(\pi(\mathcal{R})), \\ \widetilde{\sigma}_j (\pi) & := \sigma_j (2^{{-}j}\cdot \pi) = \sigma(\pi)\varphi(2^{{-}j}\cdot \pi(\mathcal{R})), \\ K_{j}& := \mathcal{F}_G^{{-}1} \sigma_j ,\\ \widetilde{K}_{j}& := \mathcal{F}_G^{{-}1} \widetilde{\sigma}_j . \end{align*}

Then (4.11) can be rewritten as

\[ T_\sigma a (x) = \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} T_{\widetilde{\sigma}_j } a(x) =\sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\int_{B(e,r)} \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)a(y)d\mu(y)=\sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} F_j (x), \]

where

\[ F_j(x) : = \int_{B(e,r)} \widetilde{K}_{j}(y^{{-}1}x)a(y) d\mu(y). \]

Using $(\sum _j u_j)^{p} \leq \sum _j |u_j|^{p}$ ($0< p \leq 1$) and Hölder's inequality, it follows that

(4.12)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \int_{B(e, cr)^{c}} |T_\sigma a (x)|^{p} d\mu(x) =\int_{B(e, cr)^{c}} \left|\sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}F_j (x) \right|^{p} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\leq \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} \left|F_j (x) \right|^{p} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad= \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}}\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}}|x|^{{-}pN} |x|^{pN}\left|F_j (x) \right|^{p} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\leq \sum_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}\left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{- \frac{2pN}{2-p}} d\mu(x)\right)^{1-\frac{p}{2}} \left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x)\right)^{\frac{p}{2}} \\ & \quad\sim \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} r^{\frac{(2-p)Q}{2} - pN}\left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x)\right)^{\frac{p}{2}}. \end{aligned} \end{equation}

Here we also used the assumption that $N > Q(1/p -1/2)$, which implies $\frac {2pN}{2-p} > Q$ and hence the function $|\cdot |^{\frac {2pN}{2-N}}$ is integrable on $B(e,\,cr)^{c}$.

Let $j_0$ be the unique integer such that $2^{-j_0} \leq r <2^{-j_0 +1}$ (i.e., $r \sim 2^{-j_0}$). To estimate the last integral in (4.12), we shall consider two cases: $j \geq j_0$ and $j < j_0$.

Case 1: $j \geq j_0$. Observe that $|x| \sim |y^{-1}x|$ whenever $x \in B(e,\,cr)^{c}$ and $y \in B(e,\,r)$. Hence for all $x \in B(e,\,cr)^{c}$,

\begin{align*} |x|^{N}|F_j (x)| & = |x|^{N}\left|\int_{B(e,r)} \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)a(y) d\mu(y)\right| \\ & \sim \int_{B(e,r)} |y^{{-}1}x|^{N} \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x) ||a(y)|d\mu(y) \\ & \leq \|a\|_{L^{2}(G)} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} |y^{{-}1}x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)|^{2} d\mu(y) \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ & \lesssim |B(e,r)|^{\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{p}} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} |y^{{-}1}x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)|^{2} d\mu(y) \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}. \end{align*}

It follows by Fubini's theorem, the fact that $\widetilde {K}_j (x) = 2^{jQ}K_j(\delta _{2^{j}}x)$, and lemma 4.2 that

(4.13)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\lesssim |B(e,r)|^{1 - \frac{2}{p}} \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} |y^{{-}1}x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)|^{2} d\mu(y) \right) d\mu(x) \\ & \quad= |B(e,r)|^{1 - \frac{2}{p}} \int_{B(e,r)} \left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |y^{{-}1}x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)|^{2} d\mu(x)\right)d\mu(y) \\ & \quad\leq |B(e,r)|^{1 - \frac{2}{p}} \int_{B(e,r)} \left(\int_{G} |y^{{-}1}x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x)|^{2} d\mu(x)\right)d\mu(y)\\ & \quad= |B(e,r)|^{1 - \frac{2}{p}} \int_{B(e,r)} \left(\int_{G} |x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (x)|^{2} d\mu(x)\right)d\mu(y) \\ & \quad= |B(e,r)|^{2 - \frac{2}{p}} \int_{G} |x|^{2N}| \widetilde{K}_j (x)|^{2} d\mu(x)\\ & \quad= |B(e,r)|^{2 - \frac{2}{p}}2^{j(Q-2N)} \int_{G} |x|^{2N} | K_j ( x)|^{2} d\mu(x)\\ & \quad\lesssim r^{(2-\frac{2}{p})Q}2^{j(Q -2N)}. \end{aligned} \end{equation}

Case 2: $j < j_0$. Let $P^{\widetilde {K}_j}_{x, M}$ be the right Taylor polynomial of $\widetilde {K}_j$ at $x$ of homogeneous degree $M$. By the vanishing moments of $a$, we have, for each $x \in B(e,\,cr)^{c}$,

(4.14)\begin{equation} F_j (x) = \int_{B(e,r)} \left[\widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x) -P^{\widetilde{K}_j}_{x, M}(y^{{-}1})\right]a(y) d\mu(y) \end{equation}

Using lemma 4.1 we can write

(4.15)\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \widetilde{K}_j (y^{{-}1}x) -P^{\widetilde{K}_j}_{x, M}(y^{{-}1}) & =\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M \rfloor \\ [\alpha] \geq M +1}} \widetilde{X}^{\alpha}\widetilde{K}_j (x) P_\alpha (y)\\ & \quad + \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} P_\alpha'(y)\int_0^{1} (\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \frac{(1-t)^{M}}{M!}dt, \end{aligned} \end{equation}

where both $P_\alpha$ and $P_\alpha '$ are polynomials on $G$ of homogeneous degree $[\alpha ]$, and

\[ (y^{{-}1})_{(t)}:= \exp \left(- \sum_{j=1}^{n} y_j X_j \right) \equiv ({-}ty_1, \cdots, -ty_n). \]

Inserting (4.15) into (4.14), and using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the size condition of atoms, we have

\begin{align*} |F_j(x)| & \leq \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} \int_{B(e,r)} \left|\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j (x) P_\alpha (y)a(y)\right| d\mu(y) \\ & \quad +\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} \int_{B(e,r)} \left|P_\alpha'(y)\int_0^{1} (\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \frac{(1-t)^{M}}{M!}dt\right| |a(y)|d\mu(y) \\ & \lesssim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}r^{(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{p})Q} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} \left|\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j (x) P_\alpha (y)\right|^{2} d\mu(y)\right)^{1/2} \\ & \quad +\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}r^{(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{p})Q} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} \left|\int_0^{1} P_\alpha'(y)(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \frac{(1-t)^{M}}{M!}dt\right|^{2} d\mu(y)\right)^{1/2} \\ & =: F^{(1)}_j(x) + F^{(2)}_j(x). \end{align*}

Thus,

\begin{align*} & \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x) \lesssim \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(1)} (x) |^{2} d\mu(x)\\ & \quad + \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(2)} (x) |^{2} d\mu(x). \end{align*}

We first estimate $\int _{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(2)} (x) |^{2} d\mu (x)$. Indeed, by Minkowski's inequality and Fubini's theorem,

\begin{align*} & \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(2)}(x) |^{2} d\mu(x) \lesssim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }\\ & \quad \left(\int_{B(e,r)} \left|\int_0^{1} P_\alpha'(y)(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \frac{(1-t)^{M}}{M!}dt\right|^{2} d\mu(y)\right) d\mu(x)\\ & \quad\leq \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }\\ & \qquad \left[\int_0^{1} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} \left|P_\alpha'(y)(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \right|^{2} d\mu(y)\right)^{1/2}dt\right]^{2} d\mu(x)\\ & \quad\leq \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} \left[\vphantom{\left.\left.\int_{B(e,r)} \left|P_\alpha'(y)(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \right|^{2} d\mu(y)d\mu(x)\right)^{1/2}dt\right]}\int_0^{1} \left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}}|x|^{2N }\right.\right.\\ & \qquad \left.\left.\int_{B(e,r)} \left|P_\alpha'(y)(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \right|^{2} d\mu(y)d\mu(x)\right)^{1/2}dt\right]^{2} \\ & \quad= \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} \left[\int_0^{1} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} |P_\alpha'(y)|^{2}\right.\right.\\ & \left.\left.\qquad \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N } \left|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big) \right|^{2} d\mu(x)d\mu(y)\right)^{1/2}dt\right]^{2} . \end{align*}

Note that if $y \in B(e,\,r)$, $x \in B(e,\,cr)^{c}$ and $t \in [0,\,1]$, then $|(y^{-1})_{(t)}x| \sim |x|$. Thus, for every $y \in B(e,\,r)$ and $t \in [0,\,1]$,

\begin{align*} & \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N } \left|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big)\right|^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad \sim \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |(y^{{-}1})_{(t)}x|^{2N } \big|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)\big((y^{{-}1})_{(t)} x\big)\big|^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\leq \int_G |x|^{2N } \big|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} \widetilde{K}_j)(x)\big|^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad = 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}\int_G |x|^{2N } \big|(\widetilde{X}^{\alpha} {K}_j)(x)\big|^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad \lesssim 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}, \end{align*}

where for the last line we used lemma 4.2. Inserting this estimate yields

\begin{align*} & \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(2)} (x) |^{2} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\lesssim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)} \left[\int_0^{1} \left(\int_{B(e,r)} |P_\alpha'(y)|^{2}d\mu(y)\right)^{1/2}dt\right]^{2} \\ & \quad \leq \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(1-\frac{2}{p})Q} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)} \int_{B(e,r)} |y|^{2[\alpha]}d\mu(y) \\ & \quad \sim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(2-\frac{2}{p})Q + 2[\alpha]} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}. \end{align*}

With a similar but easier argument, we get the analogous estimate

\[ \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j^{(1)} (x) |^{2} d\mu(x)\lesssim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(2-\frac{2}{p})Q + 2[\alpha]} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}. \]

The details are left to the interested reader.

Therefore, we have

(4.16)\begin{equation} \int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x) \lesssim \sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1\\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}} r^{(2-\frac{2}{p})Q + 2[\alpha]} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}. \end{equation}

Inserting (4.13) and (4.16) into (4.12), and using that $r \sim 2^{-j_0}$, we obtain

\begin{align*} & \int_{B(e, cr)^{c}} |T_\sigma a (x)|^{p} d\mu(x) \\ & \quad\lesssim \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}} r^{\frac{(2-p)Q}{2} - pN}\left(\int_{B(e,cr)^{c}} |x|^{2N }|F_j (x) |^{2} d\mu(x)\right)^{\frac{p}{2}} \\ & \quad\lesssim \sum_{j \geq j_0} r^{\frac{(2-p)Q}{2} - pN}\left[r^{\left(2-\frac{2}{p}\right)Q}2^{j(Q -2N)}\right]^{\frac{p}{2}}\\ & \quad + \sum_{j < j_0}\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}r^{\frac{(2-p)Q}{2} - pN} \left[ r^{(2-\frac{2}{p})Q + 2[\alpha]} 2^{j(Q + 2[\alpha] -2N)}\right]^{\frac{p}{2}} \\ & \quad \sim \sum_{j \geq j_0} 2^{(j-j_0)p\left(\frac{Q}{2}-N\right)} + \sum_{j < j_0}\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}2^{(j-j_0)p(\frac{Q}{2}+ [\alpha] -N)}. \end{align*}

Since $N > Q(1/p -1/2) > Q/2$, we have

\[ \sum_{j \geq j_0} 2^{(j-j_0)p(Q/2-N)} \lesssim 1. \]

Note that the index set $\mathcal {I}:= \{\alpha \in \mathbb {N}_0^{n} :|\alpha | \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1,\, \ [\alpha ] \geq M+1\}$ has finite elements. Moreover, the condition (4.8) implies that $\frac {Q}{2}+ [\alpha ] -N >0$ whenever $\alpha \in \mathcal {I}$. Thus

\[ \sum_{j < j_0}\sum_{\substack{|\alpha| \leq \lceil M\rfloor +1 \\ [\alpha] \geq M+1}}2^{(j-j_0)p(\frac{Q}{2}+ [\alpha] -N)}\lesssim 1. \]

Therefore,

(4.17)\begin{equation} I_2 =\int_{B(e, cr)^{c}} |T_\sigma a (x)|^{p} d\mu(x) \lesssim 1, \end{equation}

Combining (4.10) and (4.17), we obtain

\[ \|T_\sigma a\|_{L^{2}(G)}\lesssim 1. \]

This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for the valuable comments which have helped to improve the presentation of the manuscript. G. Hu and Q. Hong were supported by the NNSF of China (Grant Nos. 11901256 and 12001251) and the NSF of Jiangxi Province (Grant Nos. 20192BAB211001 and 20202BAB211001). M. Ruzhansky was supported by the FWO Odysseus 1 grant G.0H94.18N: Analysis and Partial Differential Equations

References

Alexopoulos, G.. Spectral multipliers on Lie groups of polynomial growth. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1994), 973979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, S.. Fourier Multipliers on the Heisenberg groups revisited. Studia Math. 260 (2021), 241272.Google Scholar
Bonfiglioli, A.. Taylor formula for homogenous groups and applications. Math. Z. 262 (2009), 255279.10.1007/s00209-008-0372-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderón, A. P. and Torchinsky, A.. Parabolic maximal functions associated with a distribution. II. Adv. Math. 24 (1977), 101171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, M.. $L^{p}$ bounds for spectral multipliers on nilpotent groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 328 (1991), 7381.Google Scholar
Coifman, R. and Weiss, G., Analyse harmonique non-commutative sur certains espaces homogènes, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 242 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coifman, R. and Weiss, G.. Multiplier transformations of functions on $SU(2)$ and $\Sigma _2$. Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina 25 (1970/71), 145166.Google Scholar
De Michele, L. and Mauceri, G.. $L^{p}$ multipliers on the Heisenberg group. Michigan Math. J. 26 (1979), 361371.10.1307/mmj/1029002267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixmier, J., $C^{\ast }$-algebras, Translated from the French by Jellett, Francis, North-Holland Mathematical Library, Vol. 15 (North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
Fischer, V.. Differential structure on the dual of a compact Lie group. J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020), 108555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, V. and Ruzhansky, M.. Fourier multipliers on graded Lie groups. Colloq. Math. 165 (2021), 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, V. and Ruzhansky, M., Quantization on nilpotent Lie groups, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 314 (Birkhäuser Basel, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, V. and Ruzhansky, M.. Sobolev spaces on graded Lie groups. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 67 (2017), 16711723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folland, G. B. and Stein, E. M., Hardy spaces on homogeneous groups. Mathematical Notes Vol. 28 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1982).Google Scholar
Hebisch, W. and Zienkiewicz, J.. Multiplier theorem on generalized Heisenberg groups. II. Colloq. Math. 69 (1995), 2936.10.4064/cm-69-1-29-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulanicki, A.. A functional calculus for Rockland operators on nilpotent Lie groups. Studia Math. 78 (1984), 253266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulanicki, A., Jenkins, J. W. and Ludwig, J.. Minimum eigenvalues for positive, Rockland operators. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1985), 718720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulanicki, A. and Stein, E. M., Marcinkiewicz multiplier theorem for stratified groups, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hörmander, L.. Estimates for translation invariant operators in $L^{p}$ spaces. Acta Math. 104 (1960), 93140.10.1007/BF02547187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.-C.. $L^{p}$ multiplies and their $H^{1} \rightarrow L^{1}$ estimates on the Heisenberg group. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 11 (1995), 269308.10.4171/RMI/173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, A. and Müller, D.. Spectral multiplier theorems of Euclidean type on new classes of $2$-step stratified groups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 109 (2014), 12291263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, A. and Müller, D.. Spectral multipliers on 2-step groups: topological versus homogeneous dimension. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 680702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauceri, G. and Meda, S.. Vector-valued multipliers on stratified groups. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 6 (1990), 141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, D. and Stein, E. M.. On spectral multipliers for Heisenberg and related groups. J. Math. Pures Appl. 73 (1994), 413440.Google Scholar
Rubin, R.. Multipliers on the rigid motions of the plane and their relations to multipliers on direct products. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 59 (1976), 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzhansky, M. and Wirth, J.. On multipliers on compact Lie groups. Funct. Anal. Appl. 47 (2013), 7275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzhansky, M. and Wirth, J.. $L^{p}$ Fourier multipliers on compact Lie groups. Math. Z. 280 (2015), 621642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strichartz, R.. Multiplier transformations on compact Lie groups and algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 193 (1974), 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vretare, L.. On $L^{p}$ Fourier multipliers on a compact Lie-group. Math. Scand. 35 (1974), 4955.10.7146/math.scand.a-11535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, N.. $L^{p}$ estimates for bi-invariant operators on compact Lie groups. Amer. J. Math. 94 (1972), 103118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar