Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:49:10.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effective moduli of plane polycrystals with a rank-one local compliance tensor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

L. V. Gibiansky
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research and the Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.

Extract

Recently, Grabovsky and Milton have studied effective properties of plane polycrystals made of a crystal with a rank-one local compliance tensor and a positive definite ‘weak’ direction. This paper continues their investigation. By using several complementary approaches, it is proved that the effective compliance tensor of such a polycrystal has exactly one weak direction. The new proofs clarify the link of the degenerate polycrystal problem with previously obtained results on the polycrystal properties. Investigation of the phase boundary conditions has allowed us to find the L-closure set of the effective properties of all polycrystals that can be constructed by sequential laminations of the original degenerate crystals. Bounds on the G-closure, i.e. a set of the effective properties of all the polycrystals that can be built from the given set of degenerate crystals, are found. They are given by a polygonal set in the plane of two linear invariants of the effective compliance tensors. The effective moduli of the polycrystals made from crystals with non-definite ‘weak’ directions are also studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Atkin, R. J. and Fox, N.. An introduction to the theory of elasticity (London: Longman, 1990).Google Scholar
2Avellaneda, M., Cherkaev, A. V., Gibiansky, L. V., Milton, G. W. and Rudelson, M.. A complete characterization of the possible bulk and shear moduli and planar polycrystals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 44(1996), 1179–218.Google Scholar
3Avellaneda, M., Cherkaev, A. V., Lurie, K. A. and Milton, G. W.. On the effective conductivity of polycrystals and a three-dimensional phase-interchange inequality. J. Appl. Phys. 63 (1988), 49895003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Avellaneda, M. and Milton, G. W.. Optimal bounds on the effective bulk modulus of polycrystals. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 (1989), 824–37.Google Scholar
5Bensoussan, A., Lions, J. L. and Papanicolaou, G.. Asymptotic analyses of periodic structures (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978).Google Scholar
6Bhattacharya, K. and Kohn, R. V.. Elastic energy minimization and the recoverable strain of polycrystalline shape-memory materials. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 139 (1997), 99180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Cherkaev, A. V. and Gibiansky, L. V.. Coupled estimates for bulk and shear moduli of a twodimensional isotropic elastic composite. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41 (1993), 937–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Cherkaev, A. V., Lurie, K. A. and Milton, G. W.. Invariant properties of the stress in plane elasticity and equivalence classes of composites. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 438 (1992), 519–29.Google Scholar
9Dacorogna, B.. Weak continuity and weak lower semicontinuity of non-linear functionals, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 922 (Berlin: Springer, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Gibiansky, L. V.. Effective moduli of plane polycrystals with a rank-one local stiffness tensor (in prep).Google Scholar
11Gibiansky, L. V. and Cherkaev, A. V.. Design of composite plates of extremal rigidity (Preprint 914, Phys.-Tech. Inst. Russian Acad. Sci., St. Petersburg, 1984; translated in Topics in the mathematical modeling of composite materials, eds Cherkaev, A. V. and Kohn, R. V. (Boston: Birkhauser, 1997)).Google Scholar
12Grabovsky, Yu. and Milton, G. W.. Rank one plus null-Lagrangian is an inherited property of twodimensional compliance tensors under homogenisation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 128 (1998), 283–99.Google Scholar
13Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, S.. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behavior of polycrystals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 10 (1962), 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hershey, A. V.. The elasticity of an isotropic aggregate of anisotropic cubic crystals. J. Appl. Mech. 21 (1954), 236–40.Google Scholar
15Hill, R.. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11 (1963), 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Hill, R.. Theory of mechanical properties of fibre-strengthened materials—I. Elastic behavior. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 12 (1964), 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Jikov, V. V., Kozlov, S. M. and Oleinik, O. A.. Homogenization of differential operators and integral functionals (New York: Springer, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Kneer, G.. Calculation of elastic moduli of polycrystalline aggregates with texture. Phys. Stat. Solidi 9(1965), 825–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Kohn, R. V. and Little, T. D.. Some model problems of polycrystal plasticity with deficient basic crystals (Preprint, 1997).Google Scholar
20Lurie, A. I.. Theory of elasticity (Moscow: Nauka, 1970).Google Scholar
21Lurie, K. A. and Cherkaev, A. V.. Exact estimates of conductivity of mixtures composed of two materials taken in prescribed proportion (plane problem). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 264 (1982), 1128–30.Google Scholar
22Lurie, K. A. and Cherkaev, A. V.. G-closure of some particular sets of admissible material characteristics for the problem of bending of thin plates. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 42 (1984), 305–16.Google Scholar
23Lurie, K. A. and Cherkaev, A. V.. Exact estimates of conductivity of composites formed by two isotropically conducting media taken in prescribed proportion. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 99 (1984), 7187.Google Scholar
24Lurie, K. A. and Cherkaev, A. V.. Exact estimates of the conductivity of a binary mixture of isotropic materials. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 104 (1986), 2138.Google Scholar
25Lurie, K. A. and Cherkaev, A. V.. The effective characteristics of composite materials and optimal design of constructions. In Advances in Mechanics (Poland) 9 (1986) 381; translated in Topics in the mathematical modelling of composite materials, ed. Kohn, R. V. (New York: Birkhauser, 1997).Google Scholar
26Milton, G. W.. Composites: a myriad of microstructure independent relations. In Proc. ICTAM Kyoto, eds Tatsumi, T., Watanabe, E. and Kambe, T., 443–59 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997).Google Scholar
27Murat, F. and Tartar, L.. Calcul des variations et homogeneisation. In Les Methodes de VHomogeneisation: Theorie et Applications en Physique, 319–70; (Paris: Coll. de la Dir. Des Etudes et Recherches de Electr. de France, Eyrolles, 1985; translated in Topics in the mathematical modelling of composite materials, ed. R. V. Kohn (New York: Birkhauser, 1997).Google Scholar
28Rudelson, M.. Phase transitions in solids (Master's Thesis, St Petersburg Technical University, St Petersburg, Russia, 1989).Google Scholar
29Sanchez-Palencia, E.. Nonhomogeneous Media and Vibration Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics 127 (Berlin: Springer, 1980).Google Scholar
30Tartar, L.. Estimation de coefficients homogeneises. In Computing methods in applied sciences and engineering, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 704, pp. 364–73 (Berlin: Springer, 1978).Google Scholar
31Tartar, L.. Estimations fines des coefficients homogeneises. In Ennio de Giorgi Colloquium, ed. Kree, P., Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics 125 (1985), 168–87; translated in Topics in the mathematical modelling of composite materials, ed. R. V. Kohn (New York: Birkhauser, 1997).Google Scholar
32Walpole, L.. On bounds for the overall elastic moduli of inhomogeneous systems I and II. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 14(1966), 151–62; 289–301.Google Scholar