Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:09:30.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusive–dispersive travelling waves and kinetic relations V. Singular diffusion and nonlinear dispersion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2007

Nabil Bedjaoui
Affiliation:
Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7641, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France; and INSSET, Université de Picardie, 48 rue Raspail, 02109 Saint-Quentin, France ([email protected])
Philippe G. LeFloch
Affiliation:
Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7641, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France ([email protected])

Abstract

We consider scalar hyperbolic conservation laws with non-convex flux and vanishing, nonlinear and possibly singular, diffusion and dispersion terms. The diffusion has the form R(u, ux)x and we cover, for instance, the singular diffusion (|ux|pux)x, where p ≥ 0 is arbitrary. We investigate the existence, uniqueness and various properties of classical and non-classical travelling waves and of the kinetic function. The latter serves to characterize non-classical shock waves, via an additional algebraic constrain called a kinetic relation. We discover that p = ⅓ is a somewhat unexpected critical value. For p ≤ ⅓, we obtain properties that are qualitatively similar to those we established earlier for regular and linear diffusion. However, for p > ⅓, the behaviour of the kinetic function is very different, as, for instance, non-classical shocks can have arbitrary small strength. The behaviour of the kinetic function near the origin is carefully investigated and depends on whether p < ½, p = ½ or p > ½. In particular, in the special case of the cubic flux-function and for the regularization (|ux|pux)x with p = 0, ½ or 1, the kinetic function can be computed explicitly. When p = ½, the kinetic function is simply a linear function of its argument.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)