Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T23:26:28.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approximation to inverses of normal operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

J. Mika  and
D. C. Pack
J. Mika
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, Richmond Street, Glasgow, Gl 1XH, U.K.
D. C. Pack
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, Richmond Street, Glasgow, Gl 1XH, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

For many purposes, and in particular for the calculation of upper and lower bounds to bilinear forms 〈g0,f〉, where f is the solution to an operator equation and g0 is known, it isuseful to obtain an approximation to the inverse of the operator.

For a normal operator A acting in a complex Hilbert space with bounded inverse A−1, we use a direct approach through fundamental results in functional analysis and derive a recipe for the ‘best formula’ for A−1 of form B = βI with β constant and I the identity operator. Examples illustrate that this leads to improved results for certain classes of operator.

The investigation is extended to the representation of A−1 by a polynomial in A withcomplex coefficients. For polynomials of first and higher orders the application is restricted to bounded self-adjoint operators; at first order, explicit formulae are given.

Application of the method to Fredholm operators is considered in detail, and its use for the point-wise solution to Fredholm integral equations is illustrated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 103 , Issue 3-4 , 1986 , pp. 335 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Cole, R. J., Mika, J. and Pack, D. C.. Complementary bounds for inner products associated with non-linear equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 96 (1984), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Pack, D. C., Cole, R. J. and Mika, J.. Upper and lower bounds of bilinear functionals in non-linear problems. IMA J. Appl. Math. 32 (1984), 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Mika, J., Pack, D. C. and Cole, R. J.. Optimal bounds for bilinear forms associated with linear equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 7 (1985), 518–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T.. Linear operators, Vol 1. (New York: Interscience, 1958).Google Scholar
5Kato, T.. Perturbation theory for linear operators (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1966).Google Scholar
6Robinson, P. D. and Barnsley, M. F.. Pointwise bivariational bounds on solutions of Fredholm integral equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 16 (1979), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Robinson, P. D.. New variational bounds on generalised polarizabilities. J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978), 694–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Watson, G. A.. Approximation theory and numerical methods (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1980).Google Scholar
9Todd, J., (ed.). Survey of numerical analysis (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962).Google Scholar