Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:41:35.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Localising sets for sigma-algebras and related point transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Alan Lambert
Alan Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, N.C. 28223, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Each sigma-finite subalgebra from the sigma-algebra of a measure space induces a conditional expectation operator which acts on L2 as well as the set of almost everywhere nonnegative measurable functions. The concept of localising set is introduced and shown to be closely related to certain functional equations involving . Localising sets are shown to arise naturally in the study of weighted point transformations f→ϕ. f°T, where ϕ is a measurable function and T is a measurable self-map of the state space. A complete characterisation of localising sets related to such transformations is given when the underlying measure space is completely atomic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 118 , Issue 1-2 , 1991 , pp. 111 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Campbell, J., Embry-Wardrop, M., Fleming, R., Jamison, J. and Sivaramakrishnan, N.. Normal and quasinormal weighted composition operators (preprint).Google Scholar
2Campbell, J. and Jamison, J.. On some classes of weighted composition operators. Glasgow Math. J. (to appear).Google Scholar
3Embry-Wardrop, M. and Lambert, A.. Measurable transformations and centred composition operators. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A (to appear).Google Scholar
4Fogel, S.. The Ergodic Theory of Markov Processes. Math. Studies 21 (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1969).Google Scholar
5Halmos, P. R.. A Hilbert Space Problem Book (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1967).Google Scholar
6Hoover, T., Lambert, A. and Quinn, J.. The Markov process determined by a weighted composition operator. Studio Math. (Poland) LXXII (1982), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Harrington, D. and Whitley, R.. Seminormal composition operators. J. Operator Theory 11 (1984), 125–135.Google Scholar
8Lambert, A.. Hyponormal composition operators. Bull. London Math. Soc. 18 (1986), 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Morrell, B. and Muhly, P.. Centred operators. Studia Math. 51 (1974), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Nordgren, E.. Composition operators in Hilbert space. Hilbert Space Operators, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 639 (Berlin: Springer, 1978).Google Scholar
11Singh, R. and Kumar, A.. Characterisations of invertible, unitary, and normal composition operators. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 19 (1978), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Whitley, R.. Normal and quasinormal composition operators. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1978), 114–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar