Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T23:12:48.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

7.—Beta-spectra Shape Factors in the Decay of 140La and 72Ga*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

R. D. Connor ,
T. J. Goldman  and
I. L. Fairweather
R. D. Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
T. J. Goldman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
I. L. Fairweather
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The shape factors of the partial β-spectra of highest end-point energy in the decay of 72Ga and 140La have been calculated and compared with the only previously reported determination of these quantities. For both isotopes the shape factor is consonant with the view that the Blj matrix element controls the decay. Shape factor analysis alone is insufficient to determine the cause of the predominance of a particular matrix element.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 70 , 1972 , pp. 67 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References to Literature

Canty, M. J. and Connor, R. D., 1967. Nucl. Phys., A104, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canty, M. J., Davidson, W. F. and Connor, R. D., 1966. Nucl. Phys., 85, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estulin, I. V. and Petushkov, A. A., 1962. Nucl. Phys., 36, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehrentz, D. and Daniel, H., 1961. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 10, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, R. L., Geiger, J. S. and Eastwood, T. A., 1958. Can. J. Phys., 36, 1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W., 1961. J. Scient. Instrum., 38, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. R. and Gross, L., 1950. Rev. Scient. Instrum., 21, 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsue, S. T., Kim, M. N., Langer, L. M., Spejewski, E. W. and Willett, J. B., 1967. Nucl. Phys., A101, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, W. J. and Connor, R. D., 1965. Nucl. Phys., 61, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopinski, E. J., 1966. The Theory of Beta Radioactivity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Konopinski, E. J. and Uhlenbeck, G. E., 1941. Phys. Rev., 60, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotani, T., 1959. Phys. Rev., 114, 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotani, T. and Ross, M., 1959. Phys. Rev., 113, 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, L. M. and Smith, D. R., 1960. Phys. Rev., 119, 1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, W. H. J., 1966. Internal Conversion Processes, 163. Ed. Hamilton, J. H.. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lipnik, P. and Sunier, J. W., 1964. Nucl. Phys., 53, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. H. and Zeigler, R. K., 1959. Los Alamos Scient. Rep., LA-2367.Google Scholar
Morita, M. and Morita, R. S., 1958. Phys. Rev., 109, 2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H., 1965. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 37, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, F. T., Freedman, M. S., Novey, T. B. and Wagner, F., 1956. Phys. Rev., 103, 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, F. T., Wagner, F. and Freedman, M. S., 1957. Phys. Rev., 107, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singru, R. M., Simms, P. C. and Steffen, R. M., 1966. Phys. Rev., 141, 1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wijgaarden, Wm. and Connor, R. D., 1964. Can. J. Phys., 42, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar