Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:20:45.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

5.—Semi-bounded Dirichlet Integrals and the Invariance of the Essential Spectra of Self-adjoint Operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

W. D. Evans
W. D. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University College, Cardiff.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

In the first part of the paper a criterion is given for two self-adjoint operators T, S in a Hilbert space to have the same essential spectrum, S being given in terms of T and a perturbation P. If P is a symmetric operator and the operator sum T+P is self-adjoint, then S = T+P. Otherwise, T is assumed to be semi-bounded and S is taken to be the form extension of T+P defined in terms of semi-bounded sesquilinear forms. In the case when S = T+P, the result obtained generalises the results of Schechter, and Gustafson and Weidmann for Tm- compact (m> 1) perturbations of T. In the second part of the paper a detailed study is made of the Dirichlet integral

associated with the general second-order (degenerate) elliptic differential expression in a domain Conditions under which t is closed and bounded below are established, the most significant feature of the results being that the restriction of q to suitable subsets of Ω can have large negative singularities on the boundary of Ω and at infinity. Lastly some examples are given to illustrate the abstract theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , 1976 , pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Edmunds, D. E. and Evans, W. D.. Elliptic and degenerate elliptic operators in unbounded domains. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa. 27 (1973), 591–640.Google Scholar
2Evans, W. D.. On the essential spectrum of second order degenerate elliptic operators. J. London Math. Soc. 8 (1974), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Everitt, W. N. and Giertz, M.. Inequalities and separation for certain partial differential expressions, to appear.Google Scholar
4Glazman, I. M.. Direct methods of qualitative spectral analysis of singular differential operators. (Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1965).Google Scholar
5Gustafson, K. and Weidmann, J.. On the essential spectrum. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 25 (1969), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hardy, G. H.Littlewood, J. E. and Polya, G.. Inequalities. (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1952).Google Scholar
7Jörgens, K. and Weidmann, J.. Spectral properties of Hamiltonian operators. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 313 (Berlin: Springer, 1973).Google Scholar
8Kalf, H., Schmincke, U.-W., Walter, J. and Wüst, R.. On the spectral theory of Schrodinger and Dirac operators with strongly singular potentials. Proceedings of a symposium on spectral theory and differential equations, Dundee, Scotland, 1–19 July, 1974. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 448, 182–226 (Berlin: Springer, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kato, T.Perturbation theory of linear operators. (Berlin: Springer, 1966).Google Scholar
10Schechter, M.. Hamiltonians for Singular Potentials. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 22 (1972), 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Simon, B.. Hamiltonians denned as quadratic forms. Comm. Math Phys. 21 (1971), 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Weidmann, J.. Spectral theory of partial differential operators. Proceedings of a symposium on spectral theory and differential equations, Dundee, Scotland, 1–19 July, 1974. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 448, 71–111, (Berlin: Springer, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar