Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:59:27.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

26.—Recent Light on Optical Interference*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

R. M. Sillitto
R. M. Sillitto
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The interpretation of optical interference experiments at low light intensities and with independent light sources is discussed. A new experiment on interference between modulated light beams is described briefly, and its significance is indicated. There are two appendices, one a fuller discussion of the conditions under which interference and intensity correlation may be produced, the other a comment on one aspect of Jánossy and Nagy's discussion (1956) of the feasibility of the alternating slit interference experiment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 70 , 1972 , pp. 267 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bénard, C., 1970. In Quantum Optics, Scottish Universities Summer School, 1969, 535–544. (Ed. by Kay, S. M. and Maitland, A..) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biberman, L., Fabrikant, V. and Sushkin, N. 1949. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 56, 185–186.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Hanbury, C. and Twiss, R. Q., 1956. Nature, Lond., 177, 27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Hanbury, and Twiss, R. Q., 1957. Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 242, 300–324.Google Scholar
Connes, P., Tuan, Duong Hong and Pinard, J., 1962. J. Phys. Radium, Paris, 23, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. J., and Batho, H. F., 1927. Phys. Rev., 30, 644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H., 1954. Phys. Rev., 93, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M., 1930, 1935, 1947, 1958. Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Ch. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Edinburgh Review, 1804. 5, 97–103.Google Scholar
Forrester, A. T., Gudmundsen, R. A. and Johnson, P. O., 1955. Phys. Rev., 99, 1691–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, O. R., 1965. Contemp. Phys., 7, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabor, D., 1961. Prog. Optics, 1, 111–153.Google Scholar
Glauber, R. J., 1963. Phys. Rev., 130, 2529–2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauber, R. J., 1965. In Quatum Optics and Electronics, Les Houches, 1964, 65–185. (Ed. by Blandin, De Witt, and Cohen-Tannoudji, .) New York, Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Haig, N. D. and Sillitto, R. M., 1968. Phys. Lett., 28A, 463–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitler, W., 1954. The Quantum Theory of Radiation, p. 65. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jánossy, L. and Nagy, K., 1956. Annin Phys., 17, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jánossy, L. and Náray, Z., 1957. Acta Phys. Hung., 7, 403 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jánossy, L. and Náray, Z., 1958. Nuovo Cimento Suppl., 9, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminow, I. P., 1963. Appl. Phys. Letters, 2, 41–42.Google Scholar
Magyar, G. and Mandel, L., 1963. Nature, Lond., 198, 255–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L., 1959 a. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 49, 931–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L., 1959 b. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond., 74, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L., 1961. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 51, 797–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L., 1962. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L., 1964. Phys. Rev., 134, A10–A15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfleegor, R. L. and Mandel, L., 1967. Phys. Lett., 24A, 766–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfleegor, R. L. and Mandel, L., 1968. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 58, 946–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, E. M., 1956. Nature, Lond., 178, 1449–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, W., 1968. Phys. Lett., 27A, 366–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, W., 1971. Annln Phys., 26, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, G. T., Spartalian, K. and Scarl, D. B., 1969. Nuovo Cimento, 61B, 353–364.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. L., 1962. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond., 79, 1234–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillitto, R. M., 1963. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., A, 66, 93–110.Google Scholar
Sillitto, R. M. and Wykes, C., 1972. Phys. Lett., 39A, 333–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I., 1909. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 15, 114–115.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. Sir, 1907. Proc Camb. Phil. Soc., 14, 417–424.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. P., 1930. The Wave Mechanics of Free Electrons. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Twiss, R. Q., Brown, R., Hanbury, and Little, A. G., 1957. Nature, Lond., 180, 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, W. E., 1950. Applications of Interferometry, 4th edn., 2–3. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wykes, C. Mrs, 1971. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Edinb. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Young, T., 1804. Phil. Trans., 1–16.Google Scholar
Young, T., 1807. A Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts, Lecture XXXIX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar