Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:14:04.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26.—On Shapiro's Cyclic Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

P. J. Bushell
Affiliation:
Mathematics Division, University of Sussex
A. H. Craven
Affiliation:
Mathematics Division, University of Sussex

Synopsis

The inequality, for suitable sets of non-negative numbers x1, x2, …, xn,

is undecided in the cases n = 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 and 23. In this note we present the results of numerical analysis supporting the conjecture that the inequality is valid in these cases. A new counter–example for n = 25 and a new elementary proof when n = 7 are given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Daykin, D. E.. Inequalities of a cyclic nature. J. London Math. Soc. 3 (1971), 453462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Diananda, P. H.. On a cyclic sum. Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 6 (1963), 1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Djokovic, D. Z.. Sur une inegalite. Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 6 (1963), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Malcolm, M. A.. A note on a conjecture of L. J. Mordell. Math. Comp. 25 (1971), 375377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mitrinovic, D. S.. Analytic Inequalities (Berlin: Springer, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Mordell, L. J.. Note on the inequality . J. London Math. Soc. 37 (1962), 177178.Google Scholar
7Nowosad, P.. Isoperimetric eigenvalue problems in algebras. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21 (1968), 401465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Zulauf, A.. Note on a conjecture of L. J. Mordell. Abh. Math. Sent. Univ. Hamburg 22 (1958), 229240.Google Scholar