No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
The word ‘pre-Reformation’ is almost sufficiently sweeping and spacious to provoke hasty calculations about the true bulk and vastness of the unseen part, the submerged part of the English musical iceberg. As a nation, we are certainly insular; the greater part of our traditions lies beneath the surface; and we often refer in terms of icy contempt to the noble efforts of our musical forefathers, who were intent upon outstripping their continental rivals. Writers on early organ music are frequently out of sympathy with, and consequently unkind to, our English composers. Gabrieli and Titelouze are lauded to the loft, if not to the skies; while the works of our hempen homespuns—Allwood, Burton, Coxsun, Farrant, Kyrton, Preston, Redford, Rhys, Shelbye, Shepherd, Strowger, Tallis, Taverner, Thorne, and Wynslate—are passed over with scarcely a mention. The reason is not hard to seek.
1 For Footnotes see p. 9.Google Scholar
1 Pfatteicher: John Redford (Bärenreiter, 1934).Google Scholar
2 E.g. the Gradual Haec dies (Add. MS. 29996, f. 64v); the Communion Beata viscera (Roy. App. 56, f. 7); the Sequence Fulgens praeclara (Add. MS. 29996, f. 66).Google Scholar
3 The Praise of Music (1586), p. 142.Google Scholar
4 P.C.C. 50 Alen.Google Scholar
5 La Musique d’Orgue (1930), p. 136, ff.Google Scholar
6 B. M. Harley 540, ff. 7-21.Google Scholar
7 Add. MS. 29996, f. 22v.Google Scholar
8 Hughes-Hughes: Catalogue of Manuscript Music in the British Museum, iii. 80. Entry No. 38 is also bound up with the same work. Deus Creator Omnium is not the hymn of that name, but the Kyrie trope proper to Trinity Sunday.Google Scholar
9 La Musica en la Corte de Carlos V. (1944), p. 127.Google Scholar