No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Compromises with Serialism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1961
Extract
Until a few years ago, my title could have stood without any need for further clarification: serialism, however mistrustfully it might be received in precept or example, was clearly understood to be that method of pitch relationship devised by Schoenberg. The emergence with the post-war generation of methods that treat many other musical properties as equally susceptible to a serial ordering has favoured the relegation of the earlier techniques to a class known variously as twelve-note music, or more elaborately dodecatonicism, or with dubious etymological justification dodecaphony.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Musical Association, 1961
References
1 Karlheinz Stockhausen, ‘For the 15th of September, 1955’, Die Reihe, English edition, ii (1958/59), 38.Google Scholar
2 Luigi Dallapiccola, ‘On the Twelve-Note Road’, Music Survey, TV. i (October 1951), 318.Google Scholar
3 See Zillig, Winfried, Variationen über neue Musik, Munich, 1959, pp. 136 and 255.Google Scholar
4 Gerald Abraham, A Hundred Years of Music, London, 1949, p. 295.Google Scholar
5 See Henze's contribution to the Appendix of Josef Rufer's Composition with Twelve Notes, London, 1952, p. 185.Google Scholar
6 Henri Pousseur, ‘Webern's Organic Chromaticism’, Die Reihe, English edition, ii (1958–59), 60.Google Scholar
7 From Copland's review of the Schoenberg Wind Quintet at Zurich, 1926; reprinted in Copland on Music, London, 1961, p. 180.Google Scholar
8 See Diether de la Motte, Hans Werner Henze: Der Prinz von Hamburg, Mainz, 1960, p. 32.Google Scholar
9 Dallapiccola, loc. cit., 325.Google Scholar
10 Ernst Křenek, ‘New Developments of the Twelve-Tone Technique’, Music Review, iv (1943), 82.Google Scholar
11 See Igor Stravinsky and Robert Craft, Memories and Commentaries, London, 1960, p. 107.Google Scholar
12 Sec Reinhold Schubert, ‘Bernd Alois Zimmermann’, Die Reihe, English edition, iv (1960), 105.Google Scholar