No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Cultivation of Music in English Cathedrals in the Reign of Elizabeth I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1967
Extract
At no other time in its history has the Anglican Church had so many major composers writing polyphony for its services as in the century following the Edwardian Reformation. It is this abundance of service settings and anthems, many of which are of the highest artistic merit, which has earned for this period the accolade ‘the golden age’. It is dangerously easy to regard the epithet as referring to all aspects of church music-making at this time, not least the performance of the music and the conditions under which the musicians worked. As far as the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603) is concerned, however, this is decidedly not so. Except for the Chapel Royal, and a few cathedrals and collegiate foundations, it seems certain that conditions of residence, pay and performance were of a very low standard indeed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1968 The Royal Musical Association and the Authors
References
1 Calendar of State Papers, Spanish, 1558–67, p. 105. (Throughout this paper spellings have been modernized where necessary.)Google Scholar
2 Cardwell, E., Documentary Annals of the Church of England, 2nd edn., London, 1844, i. 228–9.Google Scholar
3 Article 12; York, Borthwick Institute, R VI A 39/B 65a, f.1.Google Scholar
4 Treasurer's accounts (unfol.)Google Scholar
5 Ibid.Google Scholar
6 Royal visitation of the Southern Province, September 1559, article 28, contained in the Chapter Acts, f.140.Google Scholar
7 Article 23, quoted by W. P. M. Kennedy, Elizabethan Episcopal Administration, London, 1924, ii. 31.Google Scholar
8 British Museum, Stowe MS 128, f.8. I acknowledge the help of Dr. Watkins Shaw, who brought this manuscript to my notice.Google Scholar
9 Ibid.Google Scholar
10 Treasurer's accounts, f.286a.Google Scholar
11 Visitation articles (Devon Record Office MS 1129a), No. 20 (unfol.)Google Scholar
12 Ibid., article 21.Google Scholar
13 British Museum, Stowe MS 128, f.8.Google Scholar
14 Ibid.Google Scholar
15 Clause 25; J. P. Norris, Statutes of Bristol Cathedral, Bristol, 1870, pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
16 Hereford cathedral, MS A 3395 (unfol.)Google Scholar
17 Treasurer's accounts (unfol.)Google Scholar
18 Treasurer's accounts, p. 137.Google Scholar
19 Chapter Acts, p. 21.Google Scholar
20 Chapter Acts, f.93; J. F. Williams and B. Cozens-Hardy, ‘Extracts from the Two Earliest Minute Books of the Dean and Chapter of Norwich Cathedral’, Norfolk Record Society, xxiv (1953), 35. The fines for absence at Evening Prayer are here lower than those for Morning Prayer, probably because the latter also included the Holy Communion.Google Scholar
21 Chapter Acts, f.101; ibid., p. 36.Google Scholar
22 It was the custom at St. Paul's that singing boys could demand a fine from men wearing spurs in the cathedral.Google Scholar
23 Visitation returns, unfol.; W. S. Simpson, Registrum Statutorum et Consuetudinum Ecclesiae Cathedralis Sancti Pauli Londinensis, London, 1873, pp. 276–7.Google Scholar
24 Chapter Acts, p. 16.Google Scholar
25 A Request of All True Christians to the Honourable House of Parliament, quoted in D. Neal, The History of the Puritans, London, 1732–8, i. 389.Google Scholar
26 Article 7; W. H. Frere, Visitation Articles and Injunctions, London, 1910, iii. 136.Google Scholar
27 Article 6; ibid., iii. 319.Google Scholar
28 Whitaker, W. B., Sunday in Tudor and Stuart Times, London, 1933, p. 38.Google Scholar
29 ‘Life of Mr. William Whittingham’, ed. M. A. E. Greene, The Camden Miscellany, vi (1871), 22–23.Google Scholar
30 Of the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Politie, v (London, 1597), 76.Google Scholar
31 ‘Elizabethan Music at Ludlow: a New Source’, Music & Letters, xlix (1968), 108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 British Museum, Stowe MS 128, f.11.Google Scholar
33 Chapter Acts, ff.145v–6.Google Scholar
34 British Museum, Royal MS 18/ix, f.8.Google Scholar
35 Boswell, J., The Works of Armourie (1572); quoted in M. C. Boyd, Elizabethan Music and Musical Criticism, Philadelphia, 1962, p. 18.Google Scholar