Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:54:23.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Trepanned Skull of the Beaker Period from Dorset and the Practice of Trepanning in Prehistoric Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Stuart Piggott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The circumstances of the discovery of the trepanned skull described in this paper may be briefly summarised here: the full report of the excavations during which it was discovered will appear in a forthcoming volume of Archaeologia. In the summer of 1938 I carried out excavations on behalf of H.M. Office of Works on a group of round barrows on Crichel Down, Dorset, some 5 miles north of the town of Blandford. One of these barrows (no. 14 of the forthcoming report), a very low and inconspicuous mound about 20 feet in diameter, was found to cover a grave cut in the chalk containing a crouched human burial. The skeleton lay on its left side with the head bent slightly forward, the legs flexed so that the heels were nearly touching the pelvis, the left arm extended and the right arm flexed so that the hand rested on the shoulder. At the foot of the grave lay a beaker of Type B1 on its side, the base resting against the right tibia of the skeleton. (Fig. 1).

The whole burial was entirely typical of Beaker Period inhumations, and it was not until the skull was removed from the grave that it was found that it bore a large opening in the left parietal, and that into that opening the piece of bone which had been removed (by a careful process of grooving and ultimate excision) had been replaced before the individual had been laid in the grave. We were clearly in the presence of an exceedingly fine example of trepanning, and two points were immediately apparent, namely that the individual had not survived the operation, there being no evidence of healing on the edge of the opening, and that the replaced roundel of bone must have been strapped or bandaged into place before burial. As the skull was lifted, the roundel remained behind on the floor of the grave, and in the original deposition of the body something must have been done to secure it in position.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 6 , July 1940 , pp. 112 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anoutchine, D. N. Amoulete iz kosti tcheloviétcheskaho tcherepa. Travaux Congrés Arch, de Vilna (Moscow 1895), 1.Google Scholar
Aranzadi, T.(with Barandiaran, J. and Eguren, E.) Exploration de sets dolmenes de la sierra de Aizkorri. San Sebastian, 1919.Google Scholar
Baudouin, M. Etude d'une crâne préhistorique à triple trépanations. B.S.A., 1908, 436–450Google Scholar
Baudouin, M. La Sepulture néolithique de Belleville à Vendrest (Seine-et-Marne). M.S.P.F., 1911.Google Scholar
Baudouin, M.Un grattage cranien au silex du type neolithique (faux T-sincipital). B.S.P.F. XXXVI (1939), 168–170.Google Scholar
Baye, Baron de.L'Archéologie Prehistorique, 1880.Google Scholar
Bocage, B. de.D'une grotte antique … dans la commune de Nogent-les-Vierges, prés Creil. Mem. Soc. Roy. Antiq. France, III (1821), 298–309.Google Scholar
Broca, P. Sur la trépanation du crâne et des amulettes craniennes à l'époque néolithique. Congrés Internal. d'Anthrop. et d'Arch. préhist., Budapest, 1876, 101–196 (a).Google Scholar
Broca, P. Sur les trépanations préhistoriques. B.S.A., 1876, 236–256; 431–440 (b).Google Scholar
Brønsted, J.Danmarks Oldtid: I, Stenalderen. Copenhagen, 1938.Google Scholar
Bryce, T. H.On the Cairns and Tumuli of the Island of Bute. Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., XXXVIII (1904), 17–81.Google Scholar
Carne, P. du and Manouvrier, L. Le Dolmen ‘de la Justice,’ d'Épône, Seine-et-Oise. B.S.A., 1895 273–297.Google Scholar
Carriere, G.Matériaux pour servir à la paléthnologie des Cevennes. L'Anthrop., IX (1898), 369–379.Google Scholar
Carriere, G. and Reboul, J. Un cas de trépanation … sur un crane de la grotte sepulchrale de Rousson (Gard). B.S.A., 1894, 351.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E. de. Les Ages Préhistoriques de l'Espagne et du Portugal. 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartailhac, E.Nouveau crane trépané des dolmens de l'Aveyron. B.S.A. Lyon., 11 (1883), 148.Google Scholar
Cervinka, I. L.Moravské starožitnosti: 11, O pokoleních skrčených koster na Moravě. 1908.Google Scholar
Chantre, E.Crane trépané découvert à Crozon (Finistère). B.S.A. Lyon, VIII (1889), 258.Google Scholar
Chatellier, P. du.Exploration de quelques sepultures de l'époque du bronze dans le nord du Finistère. 1883.Google Scholar
Chauvet, , —. Trépanations préhistoriques. Sur la station néolithique d'Entre-Roche, prés Angoulême. B.S.A., 1877, 12–13.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G.The Dawn of European Civilization. 2nd edn., 1927.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G.The Dawn of European Civilization new edn., 1939.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G.The Danube in Prehistory, 1929.Google Scholar
Cⱨouquet, V.G. Découverte de gisements néolithiques à Moret (Seine-et-Marne). B.S.A., 1876, 276–286.Google Scholar
Cⱨouquet, V.G. L'Age de la pierre polie dans le canton de Moret (Seine-et-Marne). Matiriaux, 1877, 310–318 (a).Google Scholar
Cⱨouquet, V.G. Sur les crânes du Tertre-Guerin, pres Montereau (Seine-et-Marne). B.S.A., 1877, 13–15 (b).Google Scholar
Credner, V.G. Über das Gräberfeld von Giebichenstein bei Halle a S. Zeit.f. Ethnol., 1879, 46–67.Google Scholar
Dechelette, J.Manuel a'Archéologie préhistorique, 1, 1908; reprinted successively to 1924.Google Scholar
Delgado, J. F. N. La Grotte de Furninha à Peniche. Congris Internat. d'Anthrop. et d'Arch., Lisbon, 1880, 207–278.Google Scholar
Fischer-Moller, K. To nye tilfaelde af trepanerade kranier fra forhistorisk tid. Aarbøger, 1934, 278–288.Google Scholar
Forrer, R.Le cimitière néolithique de Lingolsheim. Cahiers d'Arck. et d'Hist. d'Alsace, VII.Google Scholar
Fürst, C M. Trepanerade svenska kranier från äldre tid. Acta Univ. Lund. (Lunds Univ. Årsskrift), 1913, no. 4.Google Scholar
Fürst, C M. Några nyfunna trepanerade svenska fornkranier. Fornvännen, 1917, 47–55.Google Scholar
Fürst, C M. Tvenne nya fall av trepanation i vårt land, ett från stenåldern och ett från bronsåldern. Fornvännen, 1924, 81–89.Google Scholar
Götze, A. Eine neolithische Begräbniss-Stelle bei Ketzin. Zeit.f. Ethnol., 1900, 146–151.Google Scholar
Grön, F. Rémarques sur l'operation préhistorique T-sincipital. L'Anthrop., 1911, 625–635.Google Scholar
Guiard, E.La trépanation cranienne chez les néolithiques et chez les primitifs modernes. 1930.Google Scholar
Gurlt, E.Geschichte der Chirurgie. 3 vols, 1898.Google Scholar
Hansen, S. Om Forhistorisk Trepanation i Danmark. Aarbøger, 1889, 170.Google Scholar
Horsley, V. Trephining in the Neolithic Period. J.R.A.I., 1888, 100–106.Google Scholar
Houzé, V.B.S.A., Bruxelles, 1890, 108–109.Google Scholar
Krone, O. Neue Funde der Bernburger Kultur. Mannus, 1935, 402–407.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, . Science of Chirurgie, English trans, of c. 1400 of Chirurgia Magna of 1296 ed. von Fleischhacker, R., Early Eng. Text Soc., 1894.Google Scholar
Leeds, E.T. [and Musgrave, C.]. Beakers of the Upper Thames District. Oxoniensia, 1938, 31–40.Google Scholar
Lucas-Championniére, J.La Trépanation, 1878.Google Scholar
Lucas-Championniére, J.Les origines de la trépanation décompressive, 1912.Google Scholar
Magitot, E. Essai sur les mutilations ethniques. Congrds Internat. d'Anthrop et d'Arch. préhist., Lisbon, 1880, 549–614.Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L. Le T sincipital. Rev. d'école d'Anthrop., 1896, 57–58.Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L. Trépanation cranienne préhistorique post mortem. B.S.A., 1902, 57–59 (a).Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L. Notes sur un cas de T sincipital incomplet et sur un autre lésion énigmatique du crâne. B.S.A., 1902, 601–604 (b).Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L. Deux trépanations craniennes préhistoriques … B.S.A., 1903, 404–417.Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L. Incisions, cautérisations et trépanations craniennes de l'époque néolithique. B.S.A., 1904, 67.Google Scholar
Martin, C. P.Prehistoric Man in Ireland, 1935.Google Scholar
Matiegka, J. Predhistoriská trepanace a kauterisace lebek v zemích Českých. Památky Archeologické, 1918, 78–85.Google Scholar
Montandon, G. Craniologie paléosibérienne. L'Anthrop., 1926, 209–296.Google Scholar
Mortillet, A. de. L'Allée couverte de Dampont, commune d'Us (Seine-et-Oise). B.S.A., 1889, 240–252.Google Scholar
Mortillet, A. de. Allée couverte de Dampont, commune d'Us. L'Anthrop., 1891, 380–382.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. Races humaines et chirurgie religieuse de l'époque des dolmens. Matériaux, 1877. 153–166.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. Trépanations préhistoriques. B.S.A., 1882, 143.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. Crâne trepane de Quiberon. B.S.A., 1883, 258.Google Scholar
Müller, S.Nordische Altertumskunde, 1, 1897.Google Scholar
Munro, R. On trepanning the Human Skull in Prehistoric Times. Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scot., 1892, 5–33.Google Scholar
Mynors, R.A History of the Practice of Trepanning the Skull, 1785.Google Scholar
Nadaillac, de. Mémoire sur les trépanations préhistoriques. Bull. Acad. Inscrip. et Belles-Lettres, 1886, 280–294.Google Scholar
Nadaillac, de.Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples. (Trans.), 1892.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. A. Yderligere bidrag til Danmarks stenaldersfolks anthropologi. Aarbøger, 1911, 81–205.Google Scholar
Pales, L. and Botreau-Roussel, . Faut-il reviser les trépanations préhistoriques? Rev. d'Anthrop., 1937, 296–309.Google Scholar
Parrot, L. Crâne trouvé dans une grotte … à Bray-sur-Seine, Marne … B.S.A., 1881, 104–108.Google Scholar
Parry, T. W. The Prehistoric Trephined Skulls of Great Britain. Proc. Roy. Soc. Medicine (Hist. Sec), 1921, no. 10.Google Scholar
Parry, T. W. The Collective Evidence of Trephination of the Human Skull in Great Britain during Prehistoric Times. Proc. Third Internat. Congress Medicine, 1923. (a).Google Scholar
Parry, T. W.Trephination in Prehistoric Times. Brit. Med. Journ., 1923, 457–460. (b).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parry, T. W.Holes in the Skulls of Prehistoric Man. Arch. J., 1928, 91–102.Google Scholar
Parry, T. W.(with Tildesley, M. L.). The Ovingdean Skull. Man, 1935, 55–56.Google Scholar
Parry, T. W.(with Starkey, J. L.). Skulls with surgical holing at Tell Duweir. Man, 1936, 233–234.Google Scholar
Parry, T. W. A Comparison between two roundels removed by surgical holing from two prehistoric skulls. Man, 1940, 46.Google Scholar
Pilloy, M. Une trépanation à l'époque Franque. Materiaux, 1887, 263–273.Google Scholar
Pommerol, F. Sequelette humain neolithique avec crâne trépané et lésions tuberculeuses des vertèbres. Assoc. Franc. Avance. Science, Besançon, 1893, 699–706.Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Fouilles exécutées dans les dolmens de la Lozére. B.S.A., 1868, 317–320.Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Fouilles du dolmen de l'Aumède sur le causse de Chanac (Lozère). B.S.A., 1876, 145–160.(a).Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Deux nouveaux cas de trépanations chirurgicale néolithique. B.S.A., 1876, 551–552. (b).Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Sur les cavernes de Beaumes-Chaudes (Lozère). B.S.A., 1878, 206–220.Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Precédés de trépanation sur le vivant, et fabrication des rondelles craniennes posthumes a l'époque néolithique. Assoc. Franc. Avance. Science, La Rochelle, 1882, 642–648.Google Scholar
Prunières, F. Le dolmen de Dévèzes, crâne à lesions pathologiques multiples et rondelles craniennes. Assoc. Franc. Avance. Science, Blois, 1884, 412–419.Google Scholar
Puydt, M. de. Crâne trépané découvert dans une sépulture franque à Limet (Belgique). Matériaux, 1886, 60–62.Google Scholar
Reboul, J. Observations concernant le crâne trépané … de Montpellier-le-Vieux. L'Anthrop., 1898, 380–383.Google Scholar
Retzius, G.Crania Suecica Antiqua, 1900.Google Scholar
Rousseau, L. and Baudouin, M. L'ossuaire de la Ciste des Cous, à Bazoges-en-Pareds (Vendée). M.S.P., France, 1915.Google Scholar
Rydbeck, O. En trepanation i Skåne för 3000 år sedan och dess orsaker. Medd. från Lunds Univ. Hist. Mus., 1931, 239–290.Google Scholar
Rydbeck, O. Några synpunkter rörande trepanationssedens ursprung i anslutning till ett nytt fall av stenålderstrepanation. Medd.fran Lunds Univ. Hist. Mus., 1933, 11–24.Google Scholar
Schmit, E. Présentation de quelques crânes néolithiques trépanés récuellis à Congy, Marne B. et Mini. S.A., 1909, 502–509.Google Scholar
Schranil, J.Die Vorgeschichte Böhmens und Mährens, 1928.Google Scholar
Schultze, M. Eine Schädel-Kalotte mit Trepanöffung von Balzweiler Kreis Hohensalza. Mannus, 1916, 241–244.Google Scholar
Stočky, A.La Bohême Préhistorique, I—Age de Pierre, 1929.Google Scholar
Storch, E. Neue Funde des Spätneolithikums von Dáblitz (Böhmen). Wiener Prähist. Zeit., 1915, 67–76.Google Scholar
Tallgren, A. M.The South Siberian cemetery of Oglakty from the Han period. Eurasia Sept. Ant., XI, 1936, 69–90.Google Scholar
Tartarin, E. Cimitière et stations de l'age de la pierre à Saint-Martin-la-Rivière (Vienne). Matériaux, 1884, 289–305.Google Scholar
Tartarin, E. Découvertes néolithiques dans la Vienne. Matériaux, 1885, 205–217.Google Scholar
Topinard, E. Grotte néolithique de Feigneux (Oise). B.S.A., 1887, 527.Google Scholar
Verneau, R. L'Allée couverte des Mureaux. L'Anthrop., 1890, 157–186.Google Scholar
Vigon, J.The Most Excellent Works of Chirurgerie, 1571.Google Scholar
Virchow, J. Schädel mit abgetrenntem Dach aus dem Graberfelde von Gaya, Mahren. Zeit.f. Ethnol., 1890, 171–177.Google Scholar
Vouga, P.Le Néolithique lacustre ancien., 1934.Google Scholar
Walmsley, T. A Trephined Irish Skull. Man, 1923, no. 113.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. Ein prähistorischer Schädel mit einer halbgeheilten Wunde auf der Stirne, höchstwahrscheinlich durch Trepanation enstanden. Mitt. Antrop. Gessel. Wien., 1877, 86–95.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. Über die angeblich trepanirten Cranien des Beinhauses zu Sedlec in Bohmen. Mitt. Anthrop. Gessel. Wien., 1878, 352–360.Google Scholar
Wankel, H. Über einen prähistorischen Schädel mit einer Resection des Hinterhauptes. Mitt. Anthrop. Gessel. Wien., 1882, 123–128.Google Scholar
Weinzierl, R. R. von. Übersicht über die Forschungsergebnisse in Nordböhmen. Mannus, 1909, 187–210.Google Scholar
Wosinsky, M.Das Prähistorische Schanzwerk von Lengyel, 1888.Google Scholar