Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:15:23.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stone Circles and Megalithic Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

John Barnatt  and
Gordon Moir
John Barnatt
Affiliation:
115A, Spring Gardens, Buxton, Derbyshire, England
Gordon Moir
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NEI 8ST, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thom has proposed that megalithic monuments were planned using geometry and a unit of length — the megalithic yard. All data in Thom's data-sets not deriving from well-preserved stone circles are removed, so that these proposals can be tested on this one category of monument. The statistical evidence for the existence of the megalithic yard is found to be equivocal. The shapes of stone rings, a part from the true circle, can be most easily explained as arising from layout by eye, without geometric planning. Exceptionally, two groups of stone circles which have distinctive architectural traits appear to have been planned to be truly circular, presumably using peg and rope construction. These groups are in southern England and north-east Scotland, although the latter group is not identified with certainty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , December 1984 , pp. 197 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Angell, I., 1976. ‘Stone circles: Megalithic Mathematics or Neolithic Nonsense?’, Math. Gaz. 60, 189–93.Google Scholar
Angell, I., 1978. ‘Megalithic Mathematics, Ancient Almanacs or Neolithic Nonsense’, Bull. Inst. Math. Applic. 14, 253–58.Google Scholar
Angell, I., 1979. ‘The Megalithic Yard: Fact or Fiction’, MASCA Journal 1 (3), 82–84.Google Scholar
Barnatt, J., 1982. Prehistoric Cornwall. Turnstone, Wellingborough.Google Scholar
Burl, H. A. W., 1976. The Stone Circles of the British Isles. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Cowan, T. M., 1970. ‘Megalithic Rings: Their Design Construction’, Science 168, 321–25.Google Scholar
Dunning, G. C., 1943. ‘A Stone Circle and Cairn on Mynydd Epynt, Brecknockshire, Archaeol. Cambrensis 97, 169–94.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W., 1957. ‘Grey Croft Stone Circle, Seascale, Cumberland’, Trans. Cumberland Westmorland Antiq. and Archaeol. Soc. 57, 1–8.Google Scholar
Freeman, P. R., 1976. ‘A Bayesian Analysis of the Megalithic Yard’, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A 139, 20–35.Google Scholar
Griffiths, W. E., 1960. ‘The Excavation of Stone Circles near Penmaenmawr, North Wales’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 36, 305–18.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G., 1974. ‘Hunting Quanta’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 276, 231–66.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G., 1982. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Kilbride-Jones, H. E., 1935. ‘An Account of the Excavation of the Stone Circle at Loanhead of Daviot, and … Aberdeenshire’, Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scot. 69, 168–222.Google Scholar
Patrick, J. D. and Wallace, C. S., 1982. ‘Stone Circle Geometries: An Information Theory Approach’, in Heggie, D. C. (ed.), Archaeoastronomy in the Old World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thom, A., 1955. ‘A Statistical Examination of the Megalithic Sites in Britain’, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A 118, 275–98.Google Scholar
Thom, A., 1967. Megalithic Sites in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thom, A., Thom, A. S., and Burl, H. A. W., 1980. Megalithic Rings. B. A. R., Oxford.Google Scholar