Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-jhfc5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:16:05.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report on Excavations at Jaywick Sands, Essex (1934), with some observations on the Clactonian Industry, and on the Fauna and Geological significance of the Clacton Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

Kenneth P. Oakley  and
Mary Leakey
Kenneth P. Oakley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology, British Museum (Natural History)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The foreshore exposures of Pleistocene deposits at Clacton and at Lion Point, two miles to the south-west, mark cross-sections of an ancient river channel which now extends inland in a broad curve between these two localities. The deposits have become famous through the investigations of Mr S. Hazzledine Warren, who has for many years kept a careful watch on the exposures, and who has published a number of important papers on his discoveries (Warren, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1933, 1934).

The gravels in the Clacton channel have yielded a contemporary palaeolithic flake-industry which was recognised by the Abbé Breuil as identical in style with an industry represented in the Middle Pleistocene gravels of Mesvin, Belgium (Warren, 1922). Breuil (1929, p. 6) has since proposed the name of Clactonian for this industry in view of the fact that in the Mesvin deposits the implements in question are in a derived condition, and associated with other industries, whereas at Clacton there is no doubt as to their contemporaneity with the containing gravel. Industries of Clacton style have since been recognised in numerous localities, not only in this country, but also on the Continent (Breuil, 1932). They appear to represent a widespread cultural tradition, possibly of Asiatic origin, and very probably ancestral to the later Mousterian industries.

The industry of the type station—the Clacton-on-Sea district of Essex—represents neither the earliest nor the latest stage of evolution of the Clactonian culture, and importance attaches to establishing its exact position in the Lower Palaeolithic sequence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1-2 , 1937 , pp. 217 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold-Bemrose, H. H. and Newton, E. T., 1905, ‘On an Ossiferous Cavern of Pleistocene Age at Hoe Grange Quarry, Longcliffe, near Brassington (Derbyshire),’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXI, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Baak, J. A., 1936, Regional Petrology of the Southern North Sea. Wageningen.Google Scholar
Bate, D. M. A., 1938, ‘Note on recent finds of Dama clactoniana (Cervus browni auctt.) in London and Swanscombe,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. N.S., vol. III, pp. 460–3.Google Scholar
Boule, M., 1906, [1] ‘Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé),’ tome i, fasc, II.Google Scholar
Boule, M., [2] ‘Les Grottes de Grimaldi: Résumés et Conclusions des études géologiques,’ L'Anthropologie, tome XVII, pp. 257–289.Google Scholar
Bowler-Kelley, A., 1935, ‘Silex Enigmatiques de Grande Bretagne,’ Bull. Soc. Préh. Française, no. 10, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Bowler-Kelley, A., 1937, ‘Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Facies in Europe and Africa. Separate paper of International Symposium on Early Man, Philadelphia. (Privately printed).Google Scholar
Breuil, H., 1929, ‘La Préhistoire,’ Revue des Cours et Conférences (Collège de France), 30, XII, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., ‘Les Industries à Éclats du Paléolithique Ancien, I.—Le Clactonien,’ Préhistoire, tome 1, pp. 125–190.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., and Kosłowski, L., 1931, ‘Études de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le nord de la France, la Belgique et l'Angleterre,’ L. Anthropologie, tome XLI, pp. 449–488.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., and Kosłowski, L., 1932, Ditto. L'Anthropologie, tome XLII, pp. 27–47, and pp. 299–314.Google Scholar
Breuil, H., and Kosłowski, L., 1934, Ditto. L'Anthropologie, tome XLIV, pp. 249–290.Google Scholar
Bullied, A. and Jackson, J. W., 1931, ‘The Occurrence of Corbicula fluminalis in the West of England,’ Rep. Brit. Assoc. (London), Section C, p. 379.Google Scholar
Bury, H., 1936, ‘The Farnham Terraces and their Sequence,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. for 1935, N.S. vol. 1, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1872, ‘On the Animal-remains found by Colonel Lane Fox in the High- and Low- terrace Gravels at Acton and Turnham Green,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXII, pp. 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H., 1930, ‘On the Clactonian Industry at Swanscombe,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. VI, pp. 79–116.Google Scholar
Coles, R., 1935–1936, ‘The Evolution of the Coastal Drainage of Essex,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXV, pp. 36–49, and pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
Dalton, W. H., 1891, ‘The Undulations of the Chalk in Essex,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. V, pp. 113–117, pl. III.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. B., 1868, [1] ‘On the Dentition of Rhinoceros Etruscus, Falc.,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXIV, pp. 207–217.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. B., 1868, [2] ‘On a New Species of Fossil Deer from Clacton,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. XXIV, pp. 511–516, pls. XVII–XVIII.Google Scholar
Dawkins, W. B., 1887, ‘British Pleistocene Mammalia, pt. vi (Cervidæ),’ Mem. Pal. Soc. Google Scholar
Dines, H. G., 1924, in ‘The Geology of the Country around Dartford,’ Mem. Geol. Surv. (Explanation of Sheet 271).Google Scholar
Depéret, C., and Mayet, L., 1923, ‘Les Éléphants Pliocènes,’ 2° pt., Ann. de l'Univ. de Lyon, N.S., tome I, fasc. 42, pp. 91–221.Google Scholar
Falconer, H., 1868, Palaeontological Memoirs, vol. II.Google Scholar
Garrod, D. A. E., 1936, ‘The Upper Palæolithic in the Light of Recent Discovery,’ Rep. Brit. Assoc. (Blackpool), pp. 155–172.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W., 1922, Evolution of the Essex Rivers and of the Lower Thames. Colchester.Google Scholar
Hinton, M. A. C., 1926, ‘The Pleistocene Mammalia of the British Isles and their Bearing upon the Date of the Glacial Period,’ Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., N.S. vol. XX, pp. 325–348.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T., 1937, ‘The identity of Elephas trogontherii Pohlig,’ Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, vol. XXVII, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
Hume, W. F., 1925, Geology of Egypt, vol. I. Cairo.Google Scholar
Kelley, H., 1937, ‘Acheulian Flake Tools,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. N.S. vol. III, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., 1933, ‘The Mollusca of the Pleistocene Deposits at Lion Point, Clacton,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXIV, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S. and Woodward, B. B., 1923, ‘The Non-Marine Mollusca of Clacton-on-Sea,’ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXIX, pp. 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. B. R. and Oakley, K. P., 1936, ‘The Pleistocene Succession in the Lower parts of the Thames Valley,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. N.S. vol. II, pt. I, pp. 52–76.Google Scholar
Lucas, A., 1926, ‘Problems in Connection with Ancient Egyptian Materials,’ The Analyst, vol. LI, pp. 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A., 1905, The Blackened Rocks of the Nile Cataracts and of the Egyptian Deserts. Cairo (Ministry of Finance).Google Scholar
Moir, J. R., 1921, ‘A Description of the Humanly-fashioned Flints found during the Excavations at High Lodge, Mildenhall,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. III, pp. 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, T., 1937, ‘Studies on the Palaeolithic Succession in England: no. 1, The Barnham Sequence,’ Proc. Preh. Soc., N.S., vol. III, pp. 87–135.Google Scholar
Picton, H., 1912, ‘Observations on the Bone Bed at Clacton,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. I, pp. 158–9.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I., 1933, ‘The Homologies between the Branches of the Antlers of the Cervidae based on the Theory of Dichotomous Growth,’ Proc. Zoo. Soc., pt. 2, pp. 377–406.Google Scholar
Pocock, T. I., 1903, ‘On the Drifts of the Thames Valley near London,’ Summary of Progress, Geol. Surv., for 1902, p. 199–207.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. H., 1929, ‘British Pleistocene Mammalia: The Giant Deer’ [and Fallow Deer], Mem. Pal. Soc. Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1921, ‘Excavations at High Lodge, Mildenhall: Summary of Previous Flint Finds’, Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. III, pp. 373–379.Google Scholar
Smith, R.A. and Dewey, H., 1913, ‘Stratification at Swanscombe,’ Archaeologia, vol. LXIV, pp. 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, W., 1913, ‘A Discovery of Pleistocene Bones and Flint Implements in a Gravel Pit at Dovercourt, Essex,’ Proc. Preh. E. Anglia, vol. 1, pp. 360–368.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1922, ‘The Mesvinian Industry of Clacton-on-Sea, Essex,’ Proc. Preh. Soc. E. Anglia, vol. III, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1923, ‘The Elephas-antiquus Bed of Clacton-on-Sea (Essex) and its Flora and Fauna,’ Quart, Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXXIX, pp. 606–634.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1924, ‘The Elephant-Bed of Clacton-on-Sea,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXI, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1933, ‘The Palæolithic Industries of the Clacton and Dovercourt Districts,’ Essex Naturalist, vol. XXIV, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Warren, S. H., 1934, ‘The Palæolithic Industry of Clacton-on-Sea, Essex,’ Proc. First Internat. Congress Prehist. and Protohist. Sci. (1932), pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
Wood, S. V., jun., 1866, ‘On the Structure of the Valleys of the Blackwater and the Crouch, and of the East Essex Gravel, and on the Relation of this gravel to the Denudation of the Weald,’ Geol. Mag., Dec. 1, vol. III, pp. 348–354.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F., 1936, ‘Paleobiology and Climate of the Past,’ Problems of Paleontology (Moscow), vol. 1, pp. 199–216.Google Scholar