Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:26:45.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1), Finland: a Site with Mesolithic Dwellings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Kenneth K.A. Lönnqvist
Kenneth K.A. Lönnqvist
Affiliation:
Institute for Cultural Research, Department of History. P.O. Box 59, Helsinki University, 00014, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper presents the excavations of a Late Mesolithic settlement and the dwelling depressions at Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1), Finland, in 1998. The excavations revealed the first Mesolithic house remains unearthed to date. A rich finds assemblage was also recovered, including unusual amounts of organic material such as refuse fauna and bone tools, and a chert microlith. Parallels for the Stone Age house/hut are found in Scandinavia and the Netherlands. The evidence suggests that the people were in interaction with a world that lay hundreds of kilometres outside their territory.

Résumé

Cette étude présente les excavations d'une occupation du mésolithique final et les enfoncements d'habitations à Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1), Finlande, en 1998. Les excavations révélèrent les vestiges de la toute première maison mésolithique mise au jour. On a également recouvré de riches trouvailles matérielles qui comprenaient une quantité inhabituelle de matière organique telle que de la faune rejetée et des outils en os, et un microlithe en silex. Des parallèles de la maison ou la hutte de l'âge de pierre découverte se retrouvent en Scandinavie et aux Pays-Bas. Les témoignages donnent à penser que ces peuples avaient des contacts avec un monde qui se trouvait à des centaines de kilomètres de leur territoire.

Résumen

Este trabajo presenta las excavaciones del asentamiento del tardo Mesolítico y las hoyos de viviendas en Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1), Finlandia, realizadas en 1998. Las excavaciones pusieron al descubierto los primeros restos de casas mesolíticos descubiertos hasta la fecha. Se recuperó así mismo, gran cantidad de material, que incluía cantidades poco usuales de material orgánico tales como residuos animales y útiles de hueso, y un microlito de sílex. Existen hallazgos paralelos para la casa o cabaña de la Edad de Piedra en Escandinavia y Holanda. La evidencia sugiere que los habitantes del yacimiento estaban en contacto con un mundo a cientos de kilómetros de distancia de su territorio.

Résumen

Der Artikel berichtet über die Ausgrabungen, die 1998 in einer spätmesolithischen Siedlung mit Grubenhäusern in Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1), Finnland durchgeführt wurden. Die Ausgrabungen erbrachten die Reste des bisher ersten mesolithischen Haus. Reiches Fundmaterial wurde ebenfalls geborgen, das einen untypisch hohen Anteil an organischem Material, wie z.B. weggeworfene Tierknochen und Knochengeräte und einen Mikrolithen aus Flint aufwies. Parallelen zu diesem steinzeitlichen Haus oder Hütte kommen aus Skandinavien und den Niederlanden. Die Daten suggerieren, dass die Menschen mit einer Welt in Verbindung standen, die mehrere hundert Kilometer außerhalb ihres Territoriums lag.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 75 , 2009 , pp. 305 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bloemers, J.H.F., Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., & Sarfatij, H. 1981. Verleden Land. Archeologische opgravingen in Nederland. EindhovenGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, G. (ed.). 1999. Arkeologi i Norden 1. BorgåGoogle Scholar
Carpelan, C. 1976. Nordfinska kåtbottnar från förhistorisk och historisk tid [Hut types from the prehistoric and historic period in the North of Finland]. Iskos 1, 30–4Google Scholar
Carpelan, C. 2006. On archaeological aspects of Uralic, Finno-Ugric and Finnic Societies before AD 800. Slavica Helsingiensia 27, 1–15. http://www.slav.helsinki.fi/nwrussia/eng/Conference/pdf/Carpelan.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dimbleby, G. 1978. Plants and Archaeology. The Archaeology of the Soil. London: AcademicGoogle Scholar
Engblom, L. 1992. Tervolan punamultahaudat [The red ochre burials at Tervola]. In Kentältä poimittua, kirjoitelmia arkeologian alalta, 50–7. Museovirasto, esihistorian toimisto, julkaisu 2. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Forstén, A. 1972. The Refuse Fauna of the Mesolithic Suomusjärvi Period in Finland. Finskt Museum, 74–84Google Scholar
Forstén, A. and Blomqvist, L. 1974. Refuse Faunas of the Vantaa Mesolithic and Neolithic Periods. Finskt Museum, 50–5Google Scholar
Halinen, P. 1999b. Burial practices and the structure of societies during the Stone Age in Finland. In Huurre, et al. (eds), 1999, 173–9Google Scholar
Hernek, R. & Johansson, G. 1999. Mesolitiska hyddor i Bohuslän. In Burenhult, (ed.) 1999, 206–9Google Scholar
Hiekkanen, M. 1990. A suggested interpretation of the maritime nature of Mesolithic and Early Neolithic culture in Finland. Iskos 9, 25–31Google Scholar
Hinout, J. 1998. Essai de syntèse à propos de l'art schématique mésolithique dans les massifs gréseux du Bassin parisien. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Francaise 95, 505–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huurre, M. 1979. 9000 vuotta Suomen esihistoriaa [9000 Years of Finnish Prehistory]. KeuruuGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. 2003. Material Culture and Sacred Landscape: the anthropology of the Siberian Khanty. New York: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. & Zvelebil, M. (eds). 2009. Ceramics before Farming: the origins and dispersal of pottery among hunter-gatherers of northern Eurasia from 16000 BP. London: University College London Institute of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Joukowsky, M. 1986. A Complete Manual of Field Archaeology. Tools and Techniques of Field Work for Archaeologists. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Jussila, T., Kriiska, A. & Rostedt, T. 2007. The Mesolithic settlement in NE Savo, Finland and the earliest settlement in the eastern Baltic Sea. Acta Archaeologica 78(2), 143–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kankaanpää, J. 2002. The house-pits of Kauvonkangas, Tervola. In Ranta, (ed.) 2002, 65–77Google Scholar
Katiskoski, K. 2002. The semisubterranean dwelling at Kärmelahti in Puumala, Savo Province, Eastern Finland. In Ranta, (ed.) 2002, 171–200Google Scholar
Kinnunen, K.A., Tynni, R., Hokkanen, K. & Taavitsainen, J.-P. 1985. Flint Raw Material of Prehistoric Finland: rock types, surface textures and microfossils. Vammala: Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Finland 334Google Scholar
Kinnunen, K.A. 1993. Mineralogical methods applied to the study of Stone Age quartz quarries in Finland. Fennoscandia Archaeologica 10, 9–17Google Scholar
Koivunen, P. 2002. Kierikkisaari Island in Yli-Ii – A Stone Age Pile Settlement? In Ranta, H. (ed.) Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland. National Board of Antiquities. Jyväskylä, 123–8Google Scholar
Kotivuori, H. 1993. Kivikauden asumuksia Peräpohjolassa. Selviytyjät. Näyttely pohjoisen ihmisen sitkeydestä [Stone-Age dwellings in the North of Finland. The survivors. Exhibition of the persistence of man in the North]. Lapin Maakuntamuseon julkaisuja 7. Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Kriiska, A. and Lõugas, L.. 1999. Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic Seasonal Settlement at Kõpu, Hiiumaa Island, Estonia. Environmental and Cultural History of the Eastern Baltic Region. PACT 57. Rixensart, 157–72Google Scholar
Larsson, L. 1999. Människor och miljö i ett kustsamhälle för 7000 år sedan [People and environment in a seaside settlement 7000 years ago]. In Burenhult, (ed.) 1999, 336–9Google Scholar
Lempiäinen, T. 1997. Kasvillisuuden historia Suomen Lapista – Kannattaako makrofossiilitutkimus 65-leveysasteen pohjoispuolella? [On the history of botany in Finnish Lapland – is it worthwhile to conduct macrofossil analyses north of lat. 65?]. In Early in the North. Reports of the Early in the North Project, 35–48. University of Helsinki: Helsinki Papers in Archaeology 10Google Scholar
Leskinen, S. 2002. The Late Neolithic house at Rusavierto. In Ranta, (ed.) 2002, 147–69Google Scholar
Louwe Koojmans, L.P. 1971. Mesolithic Bone and Antler Implements from the North Sea and from the Netherlands. http://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/dspace/bitstream/1887/1086/1/171_002.pdf, 1–47Google Scholar
Luho, L. 1957. Askola-kulttuuri. Suomen varhais-mesoliittinen kivikausi (Die Askola-Kultur. Die frühmesolitische Steinzeit in Finnland). Porvoo: Askola-Seuran julkaisuja IGoogle Scholar
Lönnqvist, K. 1998 Pyhtää Susikopinharju 1. Kivikautisen asuinpaikan kaivaus 1.18.6.1998 [Pyhtää Susikopinharju 1. Excavation report]. The National Board of Antiquities, Department of Archaeology, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Matiskainen, H. 1989. Studies on the chronology, material culture and subsistence economy of the Finnish Mesolithic, 10000–6000 b.p. Iskos 8Google Scholar
Meinander, C.F. 1976. Hyddbottnar av Madeneva-typ [Madeneva type huts]. Iskos 1, 26–9Google Scholar
Miettinen, T. 1998. Kymenlaakson esihistoria [The prehistory of Kymi Valley Region]. Kymenlaakson maakuntamuseon julkaisuja no. 26. KotkaGoogle Scholar
Mossberg, B. & Stenberg, L. 1995. Den nordiska floran [Nordic plants]. TurnhoutGoogle Scholar
Mäntynen, P., Äikää, O., Kankainen, T., Kaihola, L. 1987. Application of pulse-shape-discrimination to improve the precision of the carbon-14 gas-proportional-counting method. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 38, 869–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Board of Antiquities (NBA), (ed.) 1998. Esihistorialliset kiinteät muinaisjäännökset Etelä-Pohjanmaalla, Keski-Pohjanmaalla ja Pohjanmaalla [Prehistoric Sites in Southern Ostrobothnia, Central Ostrobothnia and Ostrobothnia]. Museovirasto, Eteläpohjanmaan liitto, Keski-Pohjanmaan liitto. VaasaGoogle Scholar
Nunez, M. 1991. On the food resources available to man in Stone Age Finland. Finskt Museum 97, 24–54Google Scholar
Nunez, M. & Okkonen, J. 1999. Environmental background for the rise and fall of villages and megastructures in North Ostrobothnia 4000–2000 cal BC. In Huurre, et al. (eds) 1999, 105–15Google Scholar
Ojanlatva, E. & Alakärppä, X.X.J. 2002. Interpretation of the Peurasuo House Pit in Oulu. In Ranta, H. (ed.), Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland, 109–22. Jyväskylä: National Board of AntiquitiesGoogle Scholar
Pesonen, P. 1995. Hut floor areas and ceramics – analysis of the excavation area in the Rääkkylä Pörrinmökki settlement site, Eastern Finland. Fennoscandia Archaeologica 12, 139–49Google Scholar
Pesonen, P. 1999. Rekikylä – kivikautinen kylä Ylikiimingissä [Rekikylä – a Stone Age village in Ylikiiminki]. Muinaistutkija 1, 2–15Google Scholar
Pesonen, P. 2002. Semisubterranean houses in Finland – a review. In Ranta, (ed.) 2002, 9–41Google Scholar
Rankama, T. 1995. A wasteful effort: spatial, technological, and behavioral analyses of the artefact assemblage of the Ala-Jalve site, Utsjoki, Finnish Lapland. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Licentiate of Philosophy. University of Helsinki, Department of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Rankama, T. and Kankaanpää, J. 1999. More Pieces in Vertical Movement. In Huurre, M., Carpelan, C., Halinen, P., Kirkinen, T., Laulumaa, V., Lavento, M. and Lönnqvist, M. (eds.), Dig it all. Papers dedicated to Ari Siiriäinen. The Finnish Antiquarian Society. The Archaeological Society of Finland. Jyväskylä, 45–63Google Scholar
Rankama, T. 2002. Analyses of the Quartz Assemblages of Houses 34 and 35 at Kauvongangas in Tervola. In Ranta, H. (ed.), Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland. National Board of Antiquities. Jyväskylä, 79–108Google Scholar
Ranta, H. (ed.). 2002. Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland. Jyväskylä: National Board of AntiquitiesGoogle Scholar
Räihälä, O. 1999. Mesolithic settlement on the River Emäjoki, north-east of Finland. In Huurre, et al. (eds) 1999, 201–17Google Scholar
Räty, J. 1995. The red ochre graves of Vaateranta in Taipalsaari. Fennoscandia Archaeologica 12, 161–72Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. 1990. On the Mesolithic quartz industry in Finland. Iskos 9, 7–23Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. 1996. Pioneerit pohjoisessa. Suomen varhaismesoliittinen asutus arkeologisen aineiston valossa [The pioneers in the North. Early Mesolithic habitation in the light of the archaeological material]. Suomen Museo, 5–45Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. 1998. Suomen varhaismesoliittisen pioneeriasutuksen alkuperästä [On the origin of the early Mesolithic pioneer population in Finland]. Muinaistutkija 4, 27–37Google Scholar
Siiriäinen, A. 1981a. On the Cultural Ecology of the Finnish Stone Age. Suomen Museo, 1980, 5–40Google Scholar
Siiriäinen, A. 1981b. Problems of the East Fennoscandian Mesolithic. Finskt Museum, 5–31Google Scholar
Siiriäinen, A. 1982. Recent Studies on Stone Age Economy in Finland. Fennoscandia Antiqua 1, 17–25Google Scholar
Siiriäinen, A. 1986. Kärräniemi in Rovaniemi. A middle subneolithic site with a palisade in Northern Finland. Iskos 6, 185–98Google Scholar
Sohlström, B. 1992. En stenåldershydda, en bosättningsanalys [A Stone Age hut – an analysis of the settlement]. In Kentältä poimittua, kirjoitelmia arkeologian alalta, 27–38. Museovirasto, esihistorian toimisto, Publication 2Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P.J. 1993. Extended 14C Data Base and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Beck, J.W., Burr, G.S., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., van der Plicht, J. and Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40, 1041–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and van der Plicht, J. (ed.), 1998. INTCAL98. Radiocarbon 40Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, J.-P., Simola, H. & Grönlund, E. 1998. Cultivation history beyond the periphery: early agriculture in the north European Boreal forest. Journal of World Prehistory 12, 199–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takala, H. 2004. The Ristola Site in Lahti and the Earliest Postglacial Settlement of South Finland. Turun yliopisto: unpublished PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
Ukkonen, P. 1993. The post-glacial history of the Finnish mammalian fauna. Annales Zoologici Fennici 30, 249–64Google Scholar
Ukkonen, P. and Mannermaa, K. 1998.Osteological report of the Pyhtää Susikopinharju (1) excavations. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
Ukkonen, P. 1996. Osteological analysis of the refuse fauna in the Lake Saimaa area. In Environmental Studies in Eastern Finland. Reports of the Ancient Lake Saimaa Project, 63–128. University of Helsinki: Helsinki Papers in Archaeology 8Google Scholar
Vuorinen, J.H.T. 1982. Piikivi ja Suomen kampakeraaminen piikauppa [Flint and trade in the Comb Ware period]. University of Helsinki: Moniste 30Google Scholar
Werbart, B. 1999. De mänskliga kontakterna i Östersjöområdet.In Burenhult, (ed.) 1999, 336–9Google Scholar
Wickham-Jones, C.R. 2004a. The Mesolithic in Scotland: action archaeology for the twenty-first century. Before Farming 2004/1, article 3, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham-Jones, C.R. 2004b. Structural evidence in the Scottish Mesolithic. In Saville, A. (ed.), Mesolithic Scotland and its Neighbours, 229–42. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Wickham-Jones, C.R. & Hardy, K. 2004. Camas Daraich, a Mesolithic site at the Point of Sleat, Skye. Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports 12Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M., Domaska, L. & Dennell, R. 1998. Harvesting the Sea, Farming the Forest: the emergence of Neolithic societies in the Baltic Region. Sheffield: Sheffield Archaeological Monograph 10Google Scholar
Äikää, O., Mäntynen, P. and Kankainen, T. 1992. High-performance 14C gas-proportional counting system applying pulse-shape discrimination. Radiocarbon 34, 414–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar