Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:10:00.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palaeolithic Parietal Art and its Topographical Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Michael  and
Anne Eastham
Michael
Affiliation:
Holt, Foxholes Rd, Horwich, Bolton BL6 6AP
Anne Eastham
Affiliation:
Holt, Foxholes Rd, Horwich, Bolton BL6 6AP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our purpose is to examine the hypothesis that Palaeolithic parietal image sites in south-west Europe model or map a specific area of the terrain around them in so far as that terrain was useful to the people who made the images. So far as we are aware the hypothesis has not received wide attention (Eastham 1979; Kehoe 1990). Maps were made by some hunter-gatherer peoples. There are Amerindian maps (Brody 1981; Leacock 1969), and maps have been used as an explanation of some Australian parietal figures (Mountford 1956; 1961). There has been, however, little systematic application of the hypothesis to Palaeolithic images.

The images under discussion are the recognizable representations of animals painted, engraved or carved on the walls, floors and roofs of caves and rock shelters during the last glaciation. They are recognizable because the marks of which they are composed make redundant reference to known species. They may be accompanied by others which can be interpreted as representations of human beings and ambiguous configurations of animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , 1991 , pp. 115 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aikio, P. 1989. The changing role of the reindeer in the life of the Sami. In Clutton-Brock, J. (ed.), The Walking Larder, 169–83. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Altuna, J. and Appellaniz, J. 1978. Las figuras rupestres de la Cueva de Ekain. Munibe 30, 1–3.Google Scholar
Altuna, J. 1983. On the relationship between archaeofaunas and Palaeolithic art. In Clutton-Brock, J. and Grigson, C. (eds), Hunters and their Prey, 227–38. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports IS 163.Google Scholar
Anjoulat, N. 1984. La Grotte de Girouteaux. In Leroi-Gourhan, A. (ed.), L'Andes Cavernes, 75–76. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.Google Scholar
Barrière, C. 1980–1983. La Grotte de Combarelles, nouvelles gravures. Travaux de l'lnstitut d'Art Préhistorique, 22–25.Google Scholar
Bazile, F. and Bazile-Robert, E. 1979. La Solutréen à pointes à cran de la Baume d'Oullins. Études Préhistoriques 15, 1–6.Google Scholar
Betts, A. 1983–1985. Black Desert survey. Levant, Journal of the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem and Amman 15–17, 1–10, 25–34, 29–52.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. and de Saint-Perier, R. 1927. Les Poissons, les Batraciens et les Reptiles dans l'Art Quaternaire. Paris: Masson. (Archives de l'lnstitute de Paléontologie Humaine 2.)Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1952. Quatre Cent Siècles d'Art Pariétal. Montignac: Centre d'Études et Documentation Préhistorique.Google Scholar
Brody, H. 1981. Maps and Dreams. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Camon Aznar, J. 1954. Los Artes y los Pueblos de la España Primitiva. Madrid: Espasa Calpa SA.Google Scholar
Capitan, L., Breuil, H. and Peyrony, D. 1904. Une nouvelle grotte à parois gravées; la Grotte de la Calévie. Revue de l'Ecole d'Anthropologie de Paris 14, 1132–33.Google Scholar
Capitan, L., Breuil, H. and Peyrony, D. 1910. La Caverne de Font de Gaume aux Eyzies. Monaco: Imprimerie Chêne.Google Scholar
Capitan, L., Breuil, H. and Peyrony, D. 1924. Les Combarelles aux Eyzies. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Cheynier, A. 1949. Badegoule, Station Solutréen et Protomagdalenienne. Paris: Masson. (Archives de l'lnstitute de Paléontologie Humaine 23.)Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1955. Solutré: les fouilles de 1907 à 1925 mise à point stratigraphique et typologique. Travaux de Laboratoire de Géologie, Lyons, Nouveau Séries 2, 93–222.Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1967. La Paléolithique de l'Ardèche dans son Cadre Paléoclimatique. Bordeaux: Delmas.Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1971. Anciennes civilisations retrouvées entre Rhône et Cevennes. Études Préhistoriques 1, 2–8.Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1972. La Grotte de la Tête de Lion à Bidon. Études Préhistoriques 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1984a. Grottes ornées de l'Ardèche. Les Dossiers Histoire et Archéologie 87, 80–86.Google Scholar
Combier, J. 1984b. Grottes ornées du Rhône Alpes. In Leroi-Gourhan, A. (ed.), L'Art des Cavernes. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.Google Scholar
Combier, J., Drouet, E. and Huchard, B. 1958. Les Grottes Solutréenes de la canyon inférieure de l'Ardèche. Mémoires de la Société Préhistoriques Française 5, 61–117.Google Scholar
Delluc, B. and Delluc, G. 1971. La Grotte ornée de Sous Grande Lac. Gallia Préhistoire 14, 245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delluc, B. and Delluc, G. 1978. Les manifestations graphiques Aurignaciennes sur support rocheuses des environs des Eyzies. Gallia Préhistoire 21(1 and 2), 213–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastham, A. S. and Eastham, R. M. 1979. The wall art of the Franco Cantabrian deep caves. Art History 2, 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez Reyna, S. 1965. The Cave of La Pileta. Malaga: Delegacion Provincial.Google Scholar
Glory, A. 1948. Baumes de Bouchon et de Cayre Cres. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 45, 274.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1980. Hunters, Pastoralists and Ranchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, T. F. 1973. The Gull Lake Site. A Prehistoric Bison Drive Site in Southwestern Saskatchewan. Milwaukee: Public Museums publications in Anthropology and History 1.Google Scholar
Kehoe, T. F. 1990. Corralling: evidence from Upper Palaeolithic cave art. In Davis, L. B. and Reeves, B. O. K. (eds), Hunters of the Recent Past, 34–46. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Lavoinne, M. L. and Parisi, S. 1981. Atlas Préhistorique du Midi Méditerranée. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Leacock, R. 1969. The Montagnais-Noskapi band. In Damas, D. (ed.), Band Societies, 1–20. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. 1979. The !Kung San, Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1968. The Art of Prehistoric Man in Western Europe. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1972. Considerations sur l'organisation spatiale des formes animales dans l'art pariétal Paléolithique. In Basch, M. Almagro and Guinea, M. A. Garcia (eds), Santander Symposium, 281–300. Santander and Madrid: Patronato de las Cuevas Prehistoricas.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1982. The Dawn of European Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lhomme, G. 1976. Un nouveau gisement Paléolithique en Ardèche; l'Abri des Pêcheurs à Castelnau. Ètudes Préhistoriques 13, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M. 1973. La Grotte St Eulalie à Espagnac. Gallia Préhistoire 16, 3–62 and 233–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorblanchet, M. 1989. From man to animal and sign in Palaeolithic art. In Morphy, H. (ed.), Animals into Art, 109–43. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
de Lumley, H. 1971. La Paléolithique Inférieure et Moyen du Midi Méditerranée dans son cadre géologique. Gallia Préhistoire Supl.Google Scholar
Mountford, C. P. 1956. Art, Myth and Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mountford, C. P. 1961. The artist and his art in Australian Aboriginal culture. In Smith, M. (ed.), The Artist in Tribal Society, 1–14. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mouré Romanillo, J. A. and de Balbin Behrmann, R. 1981. Las Pinturas y Grabados de la Cueva de Tito Bustillo. Valladolid: Sever Cuesta.Google Scholar
Naber, F. H., Berenger, D. J. and Zalles-Flossbach, C. 1976. L'art pariétal Paléolithique en Europe Romane. Bonner Hefte zur Vorgeschichte 14, 15 and 16.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. 1986. Magdalenian reindeer exploitation at the Grottes des Eyzies. Archaeozoologia 1 (1), 171–82.Google Scholar
Peyrony, D. 1948. Éléments de Préhistoire. Paris: A. Costes.Google Scholar
Prat, J. and de Sonneville-Bordes, D. 1963. Decouvertes recentes à la Grotte de Font de Gaume. Quaternaria 12, 115–32.Google Scholar
Rice, P. C. and Patterson, A. L. 1986. Validating the cave art archaeofaunal relationship in Cantabrian Spain. American Anthropologist 88, 658–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riviere, E. 1894. Nouvelles recherches anthropologiques et paléontologiques dans le Dordogne. (Grottes de Rey et Combarelles.) In Congres de Caen, 709–22. Société Françhise pour l'Avancement des Sciences.Google Scholar
Roudil, J. 1984. L'occupation Néolithique du Baume d'Oulen. Ardèche Archéologie 1, 14–18.Google Scholar
Roudil, J. and Saumade, M. 1985. Stratigraphies comparés de Néolithiques Ardechois. Ardèche Archéologie 2, 12–22.Google Scholar
Roussot, A. 1984. Abri du Poisson, Grottes de Font de Gaume, Grotte de Bernifal. In Leroi-Gourhan, A. (ed.), L'Art des Cavernes, 129–34, 154–56, 170–74. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1930. The Koisan Peoples of South Africa. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Shchelinsky, V. E. 1989. Some results of new investigations in the Kapova cave in the southern Urals. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 55, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieveking, A. and , G. 1962. The Caves of France and Northern Spain. London: Vista.Google Scholar
White, R. 1985. Upper Palaeolithic Land Use in Perigord. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, IS, 253.Google Scholar