Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:36:55.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Off-Site Artefact Distribution and Land-Use Intensity in Turkish Thrace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Burçin Erdoğu
Burçin Erdoğu
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, the author investigates off-site artefacts distribution around the prehistoric settlements of Turkish Thrace and provides evidence relating to prehistoric land use. Intensive block and transect surveys were completed in two small separate areas in the Edirne region, as well as intra-site gridded collection of settlements. Since until now no intensive archaeological surveys have been conducted in Turkish Thrace, this work is unique for the whole region. Results show that most of the prehistoric settlements in the Edirne region can be described as mobile, reoccupied flat settlements. Most off-site artefacts were found either immediately or in small concentrations around the settlements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 69 , 2003 , pp. 183 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, M.J. 1991. Analysing the landscape: a geographical approach to archaeological problems. In Schofield, A.J. (ed.), Interpreting Artefact Scatters. Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology: 39–57. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Ammerman, A.J. 1985. Plow-zone experiments in Calabria, Italy. Journal of Field Archaeology 12, 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J.L. & Snodgrass, A.M. 1985. The Cambridge/Bradford Boeotian Expedition: the first four years. Journal of Field Archaeology 12, 123–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J.L. & Snodgrass, A.M. 1988. Off-site pottery distributions: a regional and interregional perspective. Current Anthropology 29(3), 506–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J.L. 1992. Appearance and reality: understanding the buried landscape through new techniques in field survey. In Bernardi, M. (ed.), Archeologia del Paesaggio, 89–137. Firenze: All'Insegna del GiglioGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J. L., 2000. The Concepts of ‘Site’ and ‘Offsite’ archaeology in the surface artefact survey. In Pasquinucci, M. and Trement, F. (eds.). Non-Destructive Techniques Applied to Landscape Archaeology: 200–215. The Archaeology of Mediterranean Landscapes 4. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J.L., Oliver, D., Howard, P. & Snodgrass, A. 2000. Deconstructing ‘The sense of place’? Settlement systems, field survey, and the historic record: a case-study from Central Greece. Proceeding of Prehistoric Society 66, 123–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. 1989. The early Balkan village. In Bökönyi, S. (ed.). Neolithic of Southeastern Europe and its Neareastern Connections, 33–53. Budapest: Institute of Archaeology of Hungarian Academy of Science/Varia Archaeologica Hungarica IIGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J., 2000. ‘Rubbish-dumps’ or ‘places of deposition’? Neolithic and Copper Age settlements in Central and Eastern Europe. In Ritchie, A. (ed.). Neolithic Orkney in its European Context, 347–62. Cambridge: McDonald Institute MonographGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J., Shiel, R. & Batović, S. 1996. The Changing face of Dalmatia: Archaeological and Ecological Studies in a Mediterranean Landscape. Leicester: University PressGoogle Scholar
Cherry, J.F., Davis, J.L. & Manzourani, E. 1991. Landscape Archaeology as Long-Term History, Northern Keos in the Cycladic Islands. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.R. & Schofield, A.J. 1991. By experiment and calibration: an integrated approach to archaeology of ploughsoil. In Schofield, A.J. (ed.). Interpreting Artefact Scatters. Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology, 93–105. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Dewdney, J.C. 1971. Turkey. London: Chatto and WindusGoogle Scholar
Dunnell, R.C. & Dancey, W.S. 1983. The siteless survey: a regional scale data collection strategy. Archaeological Method and Theory 6, 267–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercan, T. 1992. Trakya'daki Senozoyik Volkanizmasl ve Bölgesel Dağllml. Jeoloji Miihendisliği 41, 37–50Google Scholar
Erdoğu, B. 1997. Edirne ili 1995 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmasl. XIV. AraşLirma Sonuçları Toplantısı I, 273–91Google Scholar
Erdogu, B. 1999. 1997 Yılı Edirne ili Yüzey Araştırması. XVI. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı II, 345–58Google Scholar
Evans, J. & O'Connor, T. 1999. Environmental Archaeology. Principles and Methods. Gloucester: Shire SuttonGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K.V. (ed.). 1976. The Early Mesoamerican Village. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Foard, G. 1978. Systematic fieldwalking and the investigation of Saxon settlement in Northamptonshire. World Archaeology 9(3), 357–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. 1981a. Off-site Archaeology and Human Adaptations in Eastern Africa. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S97Google Scholar
Foley, R. 1981b. Off-site archaeology: an alternative approach for the short-sighted. In Hodder, I., Issac, G. & Hammond, N. (eds), Pattern of the Past. Studies in Honour of David Clarke. 157–83. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, V. & Tingle, M. 1989. The Maddle Farm Project. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 200Google Scholar
Gaffney, V., Bintliff, J. & Slapsak, B. 1991. Site formation processes and Hvar Survey Project, Yugoslavia. In Scofield, A.J. (eds). Interpreting Artefact Scatters: contributions to ploughzone archaeology, 59–80. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Göçmen, K., 1976. Asaği Meriç Vadisi Ta kın Ovası ve Deltanın Alüvyal Jeomorfolojisi. Istanbul: IUCFYGoogle Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1968. Living archaeology: the Ngatatjara of Western Australia. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 24, 101–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B. & Cannon, A. 1983. Where the garbage goes: refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2, 117–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, P.P. 1991. Models for the distribution of pottery around former agricultural settlements. In Schofield, A.J. (ed.), Interpreting Artefact Scatters. Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology, 81–92. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. 1980. Discard location: the ethnographic data. American Antiquity 45(3), 490–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S.P. & Spence, T. 1997. Refuse and the formation of middens. Antiquity 71, 77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neústupný, E. 1998. Space in Prehistoric Bohemia. Praha: Institute of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 1984. Doğu Marmara ve Trakya Araşrımaıarı 1982. I. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 63–8. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Özdoğan, M., 1985. A Surface survey for prehistoric and early historic sites in northwestern Turkey. National Geographic Research for 1979, 517–41. Washington: National GeographicGoogle Scholar
Özdoğan, M., 1988. 1986 yılı Trakya ve Marmara Bolgesi Araştırmaları. V. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 157–69. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Persons, E.C. 1919. Increase by magic: a Zuni pattern. American Anthropologist 21, 272–86Google Scholar
Roper, D.C. 1976. Lateral displacement of artefacts due to plowing. American Antiquity 41, 372–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. 2000. Cultural depositional processes and post-depositional problems. In Francovich, R., Patterson, H. & Barker, G. (eds). Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 16–26. The Archaeology of Mediterranean Landscapes V. Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Ternek, Z. 1987. Explanatory Text of the Geological Map of Turkey: Istanbul. Ankara: MTAGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D.H. 1975. Non-site sampling in archaeology: Up the creek without site? In Muller, J.W. (ed.), Sampling in Archaeology, 61–81. Tuscon: University of Arizona PressGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, T.J, 1982. The definition of ancient manured zones by means of extensive sherd-sampling techniques. Journal of Field Archaeology 9, 323–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, T.J. 1989. Extensive sherd scatters and land-use intensity: some recent results. Journal of Field Archaeology 16, 31–46Google Scholar
Wright, J.C., Cherry, J.F., Davis, J.L., Mantzourani, E. & Sutton, S.B. 1990. The Nemea Valley Archaeological Project: a preliminary report. Hesperia 59(4), 579–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yellen, J. 1977. Archaeological Approaches in the Present: models for reconstructing the past. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar