Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:03:37.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Neolithic Cultures of South-East Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Robert B. K. Stevenson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

South-east Italy, from the spur to the heel of Italy's boot, forms a natural geographic and cultural unit, separated from the Balkans by the Adriatic yet joined to them by the same sea. It is an area of plain and plateau bounded to the west and north by the Apennines, which come down to the sea at the Gulf of Taranto and again north of the Gargano peninsula.

Considerably more material for the study of the neolithic cultures in this area has been found since T. E. Peet drew attention to their interest nearly forty years ago (II). Yet while the main kinds of pottery are recognised, positive evidence for their succession is still scarce. This is chiefly due to the lack of fully stratigraphic digging, as well as to a tendency to regard the objects found on any single site as ipso facto contemporary with one another or at least as due to a continuous occupation. Some confusion is probably also caused by the number of separate stations all usually called ‘Matera.’ Even so the main phases are now distinguishable, and the chief differences of opinion are regarding the extent to which the characteristic range of pottery of each of these, with all that that implies, continued alongside of the innovations.

The following account based on war-time reading, and brief visits to Matera museum and a number of sites, will stress the view that there was fairly complete replacement: in this and the resulting division into three distinct periods, tentatively indicated by Rellini in 1929 (14c), it goes beyond the views of most Italian archaeologists, as well as previous English resumes. In particular Laviosa-Zambotti in her recent important study of Italian cultures and their relations with Central Europe and the Balkans (8b), while admitting that the various wares are due to a series of influences from outside, concludes that they are truly associated and therefore largely synchronous. This may be due in part to her leaning toward ‘short’ chronologies elsewhere. However, particularly in view of J. S. P. Bradford's remarkable crop-site discoveries (2), it seems worthwhile to set out the existing evidence for a more elaborate scheme, to be tested by future excavations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 13 , 1947 , pp. 85 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.Bernabò-Brea, L., Gli scavi nella caverna delle Arene Candide.1946.Google Scholar
2.Bradford, J. S. P. and Williams-Hunt, P. R., ‘Siticulosa Apulia.’ Antiquity.1946.Google Scholar
3.Buchner, G. ‘Nota preliminare sulle ricerche preistoriche nell'isola d'Ischia,’ Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, n. s.1, 1936–1937.Google Scholar
4a.Cafici, C.Stazioni preistoriche di Trefontane e Poggio Rosso.Monumenti Antichi dei Lincei, XXIII.1915.Google Scholar
4b.Cafici, C.Contributi allo studio del neolitico siciliano. Supplement to B.P.I. XLI.1915.Google Scholar
5.Cafici, I.Apporti delle ricerche alia conoscenza delle culture presicule, B.P.I, n.s.11.1938.Google Scholar
6a.Gervasio, M.I dolmen e la civiltà del bronzo nelle Puglie.1913.Google Scholar
6b.Gervasio, M. ‘Scavi di Canne,’ Iapigia, IX.1938.Google Scholar
7.Jatta, A.La Puglia preistorica.1914.Google Scholar
8a.Laviosa-Zambotti, P. ‘La ceramica della Lagozza e la civilta palafitticola italiana vista nei suoi rapporti con le civilta mediterranee ed europee,’ B.P.I., n.s.III and IV.1939.1940.Google Scholar
8b.Laviosa-Zambotti, P.Le più antiche culture agricole europee.1943.Google Scholar
9a.Mayer, M.Le stazioni preistoriche di Mo Molfetta.1904.Google Scholar
9b.Mayer, M.Molfetta und Matera.1924.Google Scholar
10a.Mosso, A. ‘Stazione preistorica di Coppa Nevigata presso Manfredonia,’ M.A.L. XIX.1909.Google Scholar
10b.Mosso, A. ‘La necropoli neolitica di Molfetta,’ M.A.L. XX.1910.Google Scholar
10c.Mosso, A. and Samarelli, F. “Stazione neolitica di Monteverde’ and ‘Sacrario betelico nella ecc,’ Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità.1910.Google Scholar
11a.Peet, T.E.The Stone and Bronze Ages in Italy and Sicily.1909.Google Scholar
11b.Peet, T.E. ‘Prehistoric Finds at Matera,’ Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology.1909.Google Scholar
12a.Orsi, P. ‘Stazione neolitica di Stentinello,’ B.P.I, XVI.1890. See also Not. Scav., 1912.Google Scholar
12b.Orsi, P. ‘Megara Hyblaea,’ M.A.L. XXVII.1921.Google Scholar
12c.Orsi, P. ‘Neolitici di Lipari,’ B.P.I, XLVIII.1928.Google Scholar
13a.Quagliati, Q. ‘Tombe neolitiche in Taranto e nel suo territorio,’ B.P.I. XXXII.1906.Google Scholar
13b.Quagliati, Q. “Scoglio del Tonno,’ Not. Scav. 1900.Google Scholar
13c.Quagliati, Q.La Puglia preistorica.1936. (Posthumous notes, unfortunately not cited in (8b)).Google Scholar
14a.Rellini, U. ‘La Grotta delle Felci a Capri,’ M.A.L. XXIX.1923.Google Scholar
14b.Rellini, U. ‘Scavi preistorici a Serra d'Alto,’ Not. Scav. 1925.Google Scholar
14c.Rellini, U. ‘Sulla cronologia relativa dell'età eneolitica in Italia,’ Rivista di Antropologia, XXVIII.1928–1929.Google Scholar
14d.Rellini, U. ‘La civiltà enea in Italia,’ B.P.I. LIII.1933.Google Scholar
14e.Rellini, U.La più antica ceramica dipinta in Italia.1934.Google Scholar
15a.Ridola, D.La Grotta dei Pipistrelli e la Grotta Funeraria in Matera.1912.Google Scholar
15b.Ridola, D. ‘Le grandi trincee preistoriche di Matera,’ B.P.I. XLIV–XLVI.1924–1926.Google Scholar
16. Unpublished information from Signorina Bracco.Google Scholar