Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:18:37.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model of Regional Archaeological Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Robert Foley
Robert Foley
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recognition by archaeologists over the last fifteen years or so that even a discipline as down to earth as prehistory requires a theoretical basis has led to a diversity of research objectives. Essentially this has been a move away from the delineation of chronology and culture narrative towards an understanding of the behaviour of prehistoric man, requiring the development of theories relating to his ecological adaptation, his social organization, and his cognitive behaviour. The reassessment of archaeology has largely been at an explanatory or interpretative level. To some extent this has of course been paralleled by the increasingly sophisticated scientific and analytical techniques that are now available to aid in the interpretation of archaeological data. However, whilst archaeologists are more rigorous than ever before, and have developed a whole range of concepts for tackling the problems of prehistory, the actual data base employed by archaeologists has remained remarkably static. Field theory and methodology is essentially that of the earliest archaeologists. As Clarke (1973, 10) has commented, ‘harnessing powerful new methodological horses to rickety old conceptual carts has proved to be a powerful but drastic way of improving archaeological constructs by elimination’. Equally, though, the gleaming, streamlined conceptual chariots of the 1980s will go no further nor faster unless some attempt is made to update the roads over which they are expected to travel. What is necessary is a reassessment of what archaeological field data represent, i.e. how is the archaeological record formed?

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 47 , December 1981 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Binford, L. R., 1977. ‘Introduction’. In: Binford, L. R. (ed), For Theory Building in Archaeology. New York and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., 1978. ‘Dimensional analysis of behaviour and site structure: learning from an Eskimo hunting stand’, American Antiquity, 43(3), 330–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsell, J. B., 1953. ‘Some environmental and cultural factors influencing the structure of Australian aboriginal populations’, American Naturalist, 87 (834), 171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1973. ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity 47, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. and Harvey, P. H., 1977. ‘Primate Ecology and Social Organisation’, J. Zool. Land., 183, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougenik, J. A. and Sheehan, D. E., 1977. SYMAP User's Reference Manual. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, R., 1977. ‘Space and Energy: a method for analysing habitat value and utilisation in relation to archaeological sites.’ In: Clarke, D. L. (ed), Spatial Archaeology, 163–188. London and New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foley, R., 1978. ‘Incorporating sampling into initial research design: some aspects of spatial archaeology.’ In: Cherry, J. F., Gamble, C. and Shennan, S. (eds), Samplingin Contemporary Archaeology, 49–66. B. A. R. (British Series), 50.Google Scholar
Foley, R., 1981a. ‘Off-site archaeology: an alternative approach for the short-sited.’ In: Hodder, I., Hammond, N. and Isaac, G. (eds), Pattern in the Past: essays in honour of David Clarke, 157–83. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, R., 1981b. Off-Site Archaeology and Human Adaptation in Eastern Africa. Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology No. 3. B.A.R. (International Series), 97.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A. (ed), 1978. Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P., 1964. Quantitative Plant Ecology. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1977. ‘The distribution of material cultural items in the Baringo District, Kenya’, Man (N.S.), 12, 239–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, D., Yellen, J., and Macdonald, W. (eds), 1977. Experimental Archaeology. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jewell, P. A., 1966. ‘The Concept of Home Range in Mammals.’ In: Jewell, P. A. and Loizos, C. (eds), Play, Exploration and Territory in Mammals, 85–109. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 18.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B., 1968. ‘What hunters do for a living, or, how to make out on scarce resources’. In: Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (eds), Man the Hunter, 30–48. Chicago, Aldine.Google Scholar
McNab, B. K., 1963. ‘Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size,’ American Naturalist, 97 (894), 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. and May, M., 1976. ‘Body weight, diet and home range in primates’, Nature, 259, 459–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H., 1975. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., 1979. ‘Mesolithic Systems in the Netherlands.’ In: Mellars, P. (ed), The Early Post-Glacial Settlement of Northern Europe: an ecological perspective, 81–114. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B., 1976. Behavioral Archaeology. New York & London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, J., 1976. ‘Subsistence Ecology of Central Kalahari San’. In: Lee, R. B. and De Vore, I. (eds), Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers, 98–119. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. and Higgs, E. S., 1970. ‘Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: site catchment analysis,’ PPS, 36, 1–37.Google Scholar
Western, D., 1973. The structure dynamics and changes of the Amboseli ecosystem. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1974. ‘A functional estimation of population from floor area,’ American Antiquity, 39, 343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O., 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, J. J., 1978. ‘Optimal location in settlement space: a model for describing location strategies,’ American Antiquity, 43(2), 258–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodburn, J., 1972. ‘Ecology, nomadic movement and the composition of the local group among hunters and gatherers: an East African-example and its implications.’ In: Ucko, P., Dimbleby, G. W. and Tringham, R. (eds), Man, Settlement and Urbanism, 93–206. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Yellen, J., 1976. ‘Settlement patterns of the IKung: an archaeological perspective.’ In: Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I. (eds), Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers, 47–72. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yellen, J., 1977. Archaeological Approaches to the Present. New York and London, Academic Press.Google Scholar