Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:49:57.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Bronze Age trade between Britain and Europe: a maritime perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Keith Muckelroy
Keith Muckelroy
Affiliation:
This paper is an edited version of a dissertation under preparation by K. M.; it has been prepared for publication by John Coles and Veryan Heal with advice from Sean McGrail and Stuart Needham. Work at the sites, both designated under the Protection of Wrecks Act, 1973, was supported by the National Maritime Museum, British Museum and British Academy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is derived from chapters of a PhD dissertation by Keith Muckelroy which was partially completed at the time of his death in September 1980. Publication of sections relating to work on two Bronze Age wreck sites was thought appropriate since the maritime context of the material and Muckelroy's assessment of its significance related to Bronze Age studies in general as well as the more specific focus of Middle Bronze Age maritime archaeology which formed the core of the research. In these chapters Muckelroy discussed the individual artefact types and their continental relationship and assessed the implications of the Langdon Bay and Moor Sand cargoes in terms of Bronze Age seafaring and the seaborne transportation of goods. His detailed discussion of the bronze forms has been summarized here; and it is upon the maritime aspect that this paper concentrates, this being the area in which Muckelroy's work at the two sites was making its unique contribution.

The two sites under examination, Langdon Bay and Moor Sand, are well-enough known through various interim statements (Baker and Brannigan 1978; Coombs 1976; Muckelroy and Baker 1979; Muckelroy 1980) to require little detailed introduction other than a short description here. Both are important not so much for the particular objects found, but for the implications of the associations and contexts and as a result of the briefest consideration it can be asserted that in the later second millennium BC there existed vessels of size and quality sufficient to transport bulk materials across the channel, probably at regular intervals, and certainly guaranteed of receptions which warranted the organization of Bronze Age shipping by a community or segment of a community.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 47 , December 1981 , pp. 275 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Albelda, J., 1923. ‘Bronzes de Huelva (Espagne)’, Revue archéologique, 18, 222–226.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and Branigan, K., 1978. ‘Two Bronze Age swords from Salcombe, Devon, Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 7. 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchall, A., 1965. ‘The Aylesford-Swarling culture: the problem of the Belgae reconsidered’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 31, 241–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, J. C. and Mohen, J. P., 1977. ‘Le dépôt du Bronze Final I de Saint-Just-en-Chaussée (Oise), Bull. Soc. Préhist. Franç., 74, 472–481.Google Scholar
Bouscaras, A., 1971. ‘L'épave des bronzes de Rochelongues’, Archéologia, 39, 68–73.Google Scholar
Briard, J., 1963. ‘Pointes de lance de type britannique découvertes en Bretagne; leur répartition en France’, L'Anthropologie, 67, 571–578.Google Scholar
Briard, J., 1964. ‘Notes sur quelques faucilles à douille de l'âge du bronze trouvées en France’, L'Anthropologie, 68, 133–138.Google Scholar
Briard, J., 1965. Les dépôts bretons et l'âge du bronze atlantique. Rennes.Google Scholar
Briard, J. and Verron, G., 1976. Typologie des objets de l'âge du bronze en France: Haches (2), Herminettes. Soc. Préhist. Franç., Commission du Bronze, IV. Paris.Google Scholar
Briscoe, T. and Furness, A., 1955. ‘A hoard of Bronze Age weapons from Eriswell, near Mildenhall’, Antiq. J., 35, 218–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1968a. Bronze Age metalwork in northern England. Newcastle.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1968b. ‘The later Bronze Age in the British Isles and north-western France’, Archaeol. J., 125, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1969. ‘Breton palstaves from the British Isles’, Archaeol. J., 126, 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1970. ‘The Bronze Age’, Current Archaeol., 19, 208–215.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. B., 1974. ‘The Bronze Age’. In Renfrew, C. (ed), British Prehistory—A New Outline, 165–232. London.Google Scholar
Butler, J. J., 1963. ‘Bronze Age connections across the North Sea’, Palaeohistoria, IX, 1–286.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M. and Harding, A. F., 1979. The Bronze Age in Europe. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Coombs, D., 1971. Late Bronze Age metalwork in the south of England. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Coombs, D., 1976. ‘The Dover harbour bronze find—a bronze age wreck?’, Archaeol. Atlantica, 1, 193–195.Google Scholar
Cordier, G., Millotte, J. P., and Riquet, R., 1960. ‘Trois cachettes de bronze de l'Indre-et-Loire’, Gallia Préhist., 3, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, M., 1938. ‘L'age du bronze en France’, L'Anthropologie, 48, 457–502.Google Scholar
Elgee, F. and Elgee, H. W., 1933. The archaeology of Yorkshire. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Fox, A. and Britton, D., 1969. ‘A continental palstave from the ancient field system on Horridge Common, Dartmoor, England’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 35, 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. 1928. ‘Corston Beacon’, Archaeol. Cambr., 83, 137–174.Google Scholar
Fox, C. 1938. Personality of Britain, 3rd Edition. Cardiff.Google Scholar
Gaucher, G. and Mohen, J. P., 1974. L'Age du bronze dans le nord de la France. Soc. Préhist. du Nord, Amiens.Google Scholar
Gaucher, G. and Robert, Y., 1967. ‘Les dépôts de bronze de Cannes-Écluse’, Gallia Préhist., 10, 169–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimbutas, M., 1965. Bronze Age cultures in central and eastern Europe. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., 1942. ‘The Deverel Urn and the Picardy Pin’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 8, 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hencken, H., 1956. ‘The fibulas of Huelva’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 22, 213–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, H. W. M., 1956. ‘Studies in the Late Bronze Age in Ireland; 2. The typology and distribution of bronze implements’, Ulster J. Archaeol., 19, 29–56.Google Scholar
Hugues, M. C., 1965. ‘La découverte sousmarine de Rochelongue, Agde, Hérault’, Comptes Rendue d'Acad. d'Inscrip., Jan.-June 1965, 176–178.Google Scholar
Hundt, H. J., 1958. ‘Spätbronzezeitliches Doppelgrab in Frankfurt-Berkersheim’, Germania, 36, 344–61.Google Scholar
Hydrographer of the Navy, 1971. Dover Strait Pilot, 1st Edition. London.Google Scholar
Hydrographer of the Navy, 1977. Channel Pilot, 2nd Edition, London.Google Scholar
Jully, J. J., Fonquerle, D., Aris, R., and Agde, M., 1978. Agde Antiqua.Google Scholar
Kraft, G., 1927. ‘Die Stellung der Schweiz innerhalbs der bronzezeitlichen Kulturgruppen Mitteleuropas’, Anzeiger für Schweiz. Altertums, 29, 74–90.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. H., Lewis, R. P. W. and Woodroffe, A., 1966. ‘Atmospheric circulation and main climatic variables between 8000 and 0 BC: the meteorological evidence’, In Sawyer, J. S. (ed) World Climate from 8000 to 0 BC (Royal Meteorological Society), 174–211.Google Scholar
Larn, R., 1977. Goodwin Sands Shipwrecks. D & C, Newton Abbot.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. J., 1979. ‘A late Middle Bronze Age hoard from Hunstanton, Norfolk’. In Burgess, C. B. and Coombs, D. (eds) Bronze Age Hoards; some finds old and new, BAR British Series, 67, 43–92.Google Scholar
McArdle, T. D., 1969. Personal Armament in Middle and Late Bronze Age France. PhD thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Millotte, J. P., 1959. ‘Essai sur les relations entre Test et l'ouest de la France aux ages des métaux’, Ogam, 11, 131–54.Google Scholar
Millotte, J. P., Cordier, G., and Abauzit, P., 1968. ‘Essai de typologie protohistorique: les haches à ailerons medians’, Revue Archéol. de l'Est, 19, 7–67.Google Scholar
Mohen, J. P., 1968. ‘Bronzes protohistoriques de Paris et sa région au Musée de l'Armee (Invalides)’, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Franç., 65, 779–816.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K., 1978. Maritime Archaeology. C.U.P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K. and Baker, P., 1979. ‘The Bronze Age site off Moor Sand, near Salcombe, Devon’, Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 8, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muckelroy, K., 1980. ‘Two Bronze Age cargoes in British Waters’, Antiquity, LIV, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reim, H., 1974. Die spätbronzezeitlichen Griffplatten-, Griffdorn-, und Griffangelschwerter in Ostfrankreich. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abt. IV, Band 3, München.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. J., 1971a. ‘The archaeological interpretation of prehistoric metal working’, World Archaeol., 3, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. J., 1971b. ‘A group of incised decorated armrings and their significance for the Middle Bronze Age of southern Britain’, British Museum Quarterly, 35, 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. J., 1976. The organisation of Middle Bronze Age metalworking. Brit. Archaeol. Rep., 31. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sandars, N. K. 1957. Bronze Age Cultures in France. C.U.P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Savory, H. N., 1949. ‘The Atlantic Bronze Age in south-west Europe’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., 15, 128–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, P., 1971. Die Schwerter in Süddeutschland, Österreich, und der Schweiz Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abt. IV, Band 2, München.Google Scholar
Smith, M. A., 1959. ‘Some Somerset hoards and their place in the Bronze Age of southern Britain’, Proc. Préhist. Soc., 25, 144–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprockhoff, E., 1941. ‘Niedersachsens Bedeutung für die Bronzezeit Westeuropas’, Bericht Röm.-Germ. Komm., 31. 1–135.Google Scholar
Williams, A., 1937. ‘Bronze Implements from Swansea’, Archaeol. Cambr., 92, 333–34.Google Scholar