Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:23:05.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Megalithic Tomb of Pedra Branca, Portugal. Preliminary Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

C. T. North
Affiliation:
Rua Heliodoro Salgado 6B, Santa Amaro de Oeiras, Portugal

Extract

The megalithic tomb of Pedra Branca lies at Montum, on the west coast of Portugal about 140 kilometers south of Lisbon by road (fig. 1). The tomb is the first in Portugal to have yielded Beaker graves overlying earlier burials; prior to its discovery, no Beaker remains had ever been noted further south than Palmela, in the estuary of the Sado river, approximately 40 kilometers from Lisbon. The tomb is situated on the top of a small hillock 100 m above sea level, separated from the Atlantic Ocean by a fertile undulating plain about 5 km in width. The Lake of Melides lies to the north and, to the east, the hills of Grandola rise steeply to an altitude of 300 m; an expanse of rough terrain stretches to the south, ravined by various small streams which flow into the Lake of Santo André on the coast.

When the tomb was discovered by surveyors of the Geological Services of Portugal, it was already very badly damaged; all the orthostats had been broken for use in local construction and part of the circular covering mound had already been ploughed under. The Services therefore, decided that a salvage campaign was called for, and a team made up of the authors, was invited to carry it out with funds granted by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Albright, W. F., 1960. Archaeology in Palestine. Pelican Books, London.Google Scholar
Almagro, M., 1959. ’La primera fecha absoluta para la cultura de Los Millares a base del carbono 14’, Ampurias, 21, 249251.Google Scholar
Belo, R., Trinidade, L. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1961. ‘Gruta da Cova da Moura (Torres Vedras)’. Communicação dos Serviços Geólogicos de Portugal, 45, 391418.Google Scholar
Bender, B. and Phillips, P., 1972. ‘The Early Farmers of France’, Antiquity, 46, 97105.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1970. The Beaker Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ehrich, R. B., Edit., 1971. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gallay, G.. Spindler, K. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1973. ‘O monumento pré-histórico de Pai Mogo’, Associação dos Arquelogos Portugueses, Lisboa..Google Scholar
Guerra, A. V. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1971. ‘Noticia sobre uma falange-ídolo gravada do Museu Doutor Santos Rocha na Figueira da Foz’, Revista de Guimarães, 81, 19.Google Scholar
Guilaine, J., 1967. La civilization du vase campaniforme dans les Pyrénées Françaises. CNRS, Carcassone.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., 1974. ‘Origins of the Bell Beaker Cultures’, Antiquity, 48, 99109.Google Scholar
Kenyon, K., 1971. Archaeology in the Holy Land. Ernest Benn, London.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. and Leisner, V., 1943. Die Megalithgraber der Iberischen Halbinsel: I Der Suden. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. and Leisner, V., 1949. ‘Antas dos arredores de Évora’, A Cidade de Évora, 15/16 and 17/18, Évora.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. and Leisner, V., 1951. ‘Antas do Concelho de Reguengos de Monsaraz’, Instituto de Alta Cultura, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Leisner, V., 1959. Die Megalithgraber der Iberischen Halbinsel: II Der Westen. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Leisner, V., Zbyszewski, G. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1961. ‘Les grottes artificielles de Casal do Pardo, (Palmela) et la culture du vase campaniforme’, Memorias dos Serviços Geologicos de Portugal, 8 Nova série, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Leisner, V. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1963. ‘Primeiras datas de rádio-carbono 14 para a cultura megalítica portuguesa’, Revista de Guimarães, 73, 358366, Guimarães.Google Scholar
Leisner, V., Paço, A. and Ribeiro, L., 1964. Grutas artificiais de S. Pedro do Estoril. Ed. Gulbenkian, Fundação Calouste, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Leisner, V., Zbyszewski, G. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1969. ‘Les Monuments Préhistoriques de Praia das Maçãs et de Casainhos’, Memorias dos Serviços Geologicos de Portugal, 16, Nova seŕie, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Monteiro, R., Zbyszewski, G. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1971. ‘Nota preliminar sobre a lapa pré-histórica do Bugio, (Azoia, Sesimbra)’, Actas do II Congresso Nacional de Arqueologia, 1, 107120, Coimbra.Google Scholar
Paço, A. do and Jalhay, E., 1941. ‘A gruta II da necróple de Alapraia’, Anais da Academia Portuguesa de Historia, Serie I, 4, 107140, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Riquel, R., Guilaine, J. and Cofryn, A., 1963. ‘Les campaniformes français’, Gallia Préhistoire, 6, 63128.Google Scholar
Savory, H. N., 1968. Spain and Portugal. Thames & Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Treinen, F., 1970. ‘Les poteries campaniformes en France’, Gallia Préhistoire, 13, 53332.Google Scholar
Trindade, L. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1971. ‘Vaso campaniforme ‘tipo garrafa bojuda’ do Museu de Torres Vedras’, Revista de Guimarães, 81, 261264.Google Scholar
Vermeule, E., 1972. Greece in the Bronze Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Viana, A., Zbyszewski, G., Andrade, R. Freire de, Malheiro, A. and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1959. ‘Contribuição para o conhecimento da arqueologia megalítica do Baixo Alentejo’, Actas do I Congresso National de Arqueologia, 1, 197213, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Viana, A., Andrade, R. Freire de and Ferreira, O. da Veiga, 1961. ‘Um túmulo do tipo alcalarense nos arredores de Aljustrel’, Revista de Guimarães, 61, 247254.Google Scholar
Viana, A., Ferreira, O. da Veiga and Andrade, R. Freire de, 1961. ‘Descoberta de dois monumentos de falsa cúpula na região de Ourique’, Revista de Guimarães, 71, 512.Google Scholar