Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:30:18.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material Genealogies: Bronze Moulds and their Castings in Later Bronze Age Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2016

Leo Webley  and
Sophia Adams
Leo Webley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UU Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sophia Adams
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UU Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bivalve bronze moulds were used for casting bronze and lead objects – mainly axes – during the Middle and Late Bronze Age. These remarkable artefacts, which were sometimes beautifully decorated, have been surprisingly little studied. This paper discusses the bronze moulds from Britain, outlining the range of possibilities that existed for the life courses of these objects during the three broad stages of manufacture, use, and deposition. Two points will be emphasised. First, it will be shown that the biographical pathways available to bronze moulds differed significantly from those of moulds made from stone or clay, which may relate to the differing properties and conceptual associations of these three materials. Secondly, the relationships between the life courses of bronze moulds and the artefacts cast in them will be explored, focusing particularly on cases in which moulds and their castings were deposited together in the same hoard. It will be suggested that the ‘genealogical’ link between a mould and its ‘offspring’ could have formed a significant element of the biography of both objects.

Résumé

Généalogies matérielles: Moules de bronze et leurs moulages à l’âge du bronze moyen et final en Grande-Bretagne de Leo Webley & Sophia Adams

Des moules bivalves en bronze furent utilisés pour mouler des objets en bronze et en plomb, essentiellement des haches, pendant l’âge du bronze moyen et final. Il est surprenant que ces remarquables objets fabriqués, qui furent parfois admirablement décorés, ont été si peu étudiés. Cet article débat des moules de bronze britanniques, exposant la gamme de possibilités qui existait pour le cours de la vie de ces objets pendant les trois grands stades de la fabrication, de l’utilisation et de la déposition. Nous insisterons sur deux points. D’abord, nous montrerons que les chemins biographiques accessibles aux moules de bronze différaient grandement de ceux des moules fabriqués en pierre ou en argile, ce qui peut avoir un rapport avec les propriétés différentes et les associations conceptuelles des ces trois matériaux. Ensuite, nous explorerons les relations entre le cours de la vie des moules en bronze et les objets fabriqués moulés dedans, nous concentrant particulièrement sur les cas dans lesquels les moules et leurs objets avaient été déposés ensemble dans la même cache. Nous proposerons que le lien ‘généalogique’ entre un moule et son ‘rejeton’, aurait pu former un élément significatif de la biographie de ces deux objets.

Zussamenfassung

Materielle Genealogien: Bronzegussformen und ihre Gussstücke im Großbritannien der späteren Bronzezeit, von Leo Webley und Sophia Adams

Zweischalige Gussformen aus Bronze wurden in der mittleren und späten Bronzezeit zum Guss von Bronze- und Bleiobjekten – vor allem Äxten – genutzt. Diese auffälligen Artefakte, die manchmal reich verziert wurden, wurden bisher erstaunlich selten untersucht. Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die bronzenen Gussformen aus Großbritannien und stellt die Bandbreite der Möglichkeiten vor für den Lebensweg dieser Objekte während der drei grundsätzlichen Stufen der Herstellung, Nutzung und Deponierung. Zwei Punkte werden besonders betont: Zum einen wird gezeigt, dass die biographischen Wege, die den Gussformen aus Bronze offen standen, sich signifikant unterschieden von jenen für Gussformen aus Stein oder Ton, was mit den unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften und konzeptuellen Assoziationen dieser drei Materialen zusammenhängen mag. Zum anderen wird der Zusammenhang zwischen den bronzenen Gussformen und den in ihnen gegossenen Artefakten untersucht, wobei insbesondere auf Fälle eingegangen wird, in denen Gussformen und ihre Gussstücke zusammen in der gleichen Deponierung niedergelegt worden sind. Es wird angenommen, dass der ‚genealogische‘ Link zwischen einer Form und ihrem‚ Abkömmling‘ ein signifikantes Element in der Biographie beider Objekte gebildet haben kann.

Resumen

Genealogías materiales: moldes de bronce y sus piezas de función durante el Bronce Medio y Final en Gran Bretaña, por Leo Webley y Sophia Adams

Los moldes de bronce bivalvos se emplearon para la fundición de objetos de bronce y plomo -fundamentalmente hachas- durante el Bronce Medio y Final. Sorprendentemente estos objetos excepcionales, que están en ocasiones profusamente decorados, han sido poco estudiados. Este artículo presenta los moldes de bronce documentados en Gran Bretaña, describiendo un rango de posibilidades sobre la vida útil de este tipo de objetos durante las tres fases de manufactura, uso y deposición. Se resaltan especialmente dos aspectos. El primero refleja que la secuencia biográfica de estos moldes en bronce difiere significativamente de aquéllos realizados en piedra o arcilla, lo cual se podría relacionar con diferentes propiedades y asociaciones conceptuales de estos tres materiales. En segundo lugar, se explora la relación entre la vida útil de los moldes de bronce y las piezas fundidas, centrándose especialmente en los casos en los que ambos fueron depositados en las mismas acumulaciones. Se propone que este vínculo “genealógico” entre los moldes y su “descendencia” podría haber constituido un elemento significativo de la biografía de ambos objetos.

Keywords

Archaeometallurgyartefact biographiesartefact genealogiesBronze Agebronze castinghoardslead castingmetalworkmoulds
Type
Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 82 , December 2016 , pp. 323 - 340
Copyright
© The Prehistoric Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agache, R. 1968. Nord et Picardie. Gallia Préhistoire 11, 267–309 Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. 2000. Goldschmiedekunst und Bronzetechnik: Studien zum Metallhandwerk der Atlantischen Bronzezeit auf der Iberischen Halbinsel. Montagnac: Monique Mergoil Google Scholar
Barber, M. 2003. Bronze and the Bronze Age. Stroud: Tempus Google Scholar
Baron, J., Miazga, B. & Nowak, K. 2014. Functions and contexts of Bronze Age metal casting moulds from Poland. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 111, 325–338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., Miazga, B., Ntaflos, T., Puziewicz, J. & Szumny, A. 2015. Beeswax remnants, phase and major element chemical composition of the Bronze Age mould from Gaj Oławski (SW Poland). Archaeological & Anthropological Sciences 8(1), 187–196 Google Scholar
Bayley, J., Mackreth, D. & Wallis, H. 2001. Evidence for Romano-British brooch production at Old Buckenham, Norfolk. Britannia 32, 93–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, S. & Needham, S. 2007. The Dunaverney and Little Thetford flesh-hooks: History, technology and their position within the late Bronze Age Atlantic zone feasting complex. Antiquaries Journal 87, 53–108 Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998. The Passage of Arms: An archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoards and votive deposits, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Ford, D. 2004. A long distance connection in the Bronze Age: Joining fragments of a Ewert Park sword from two sites in England. In H. Roche, E. Grogan, J. Bradley, J. Coles & B. Raftery (eds), From Megaliths to Metals: Essays in honour of George Eogan, 174–177. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Braithwaite, M. 1982. Decoration as ritual symbol: A theoretical proposal and an ethnographic study in southern Sudan. In I. Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, 80–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Briggs, S., Leahy, K. & Needham, S. 1987. The late Bronze Age hoard from Brough-on-Humber: A re-assessment. Antiquaries Journal 67, 11–28 Google Scholar
Brück, J. 2006. Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in middle and late Bronze Age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16, 297–315 Google Scholar
Čivilytė, A. 2004. Pagaminti tam, kad panaudotum? Keletas nežinomos bronzinės liejimo formos (Dovilai, Klaipėdos r.) reikšmių [English summary: To produce for use? Several meanings of unknown bronze casting mould (Dovilai, Klaipėda district)]. Lietuvos Archeologija 25, 221–232 Google Scholar
Clark, E. 1905. Report as local secretary for Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London 2nd Series 20, 258–63Google Scholar
Coghlan, H. 1975. Notes on the Prehistoric Metallurgy of Copper and Bronze in the Old World, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Coombs, D. 1971. Late Bronze Age Metalwork in the South of England: Typology, chronology and industrial traditions. PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cordier, G. 2012. Le dépôt de l’âge du Bronze final de l’Étang, commune de Saint-Germain-sur-Vienne (dép. Indre-et-Loire). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 42, 31–39 Google Scholar
Crowe, K. 2003. Two late Bronze Age hoards from south-east Essex. Essex Archaeology and History 34, 1–18 Google Scholar
Denyer, S. 1978. African Traditional Architecture: An historical and geographical perspective. London: Heinemann Google Scholar
Drescher, H. 1957. Bronzeguß in Formen aus Bronze. Die Kunde, Neue Folge 8, 52–75 Google Scholar
Drescher, H. 1958. Der Überfangguss. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1881. The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Longmans, Green & Co Google Scholar
Foltz, E. 1980. Guss in verlorener Form mit Bleimodellen? Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 10, 345–349 Google Scholar
Fontijn, D. 2002. Sacrificial Landscapes: Cultural biographies of persons, objects and ‘natural’ places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands. Leiden: Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 33/34Google Scholar
Fregni, E. 2014. The Compleat Metalsmith: Craft and technology in the British Bronze Age. PhD thesis, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31, 169–178 Google Scholar
Greenwell, W. & Clinch, G. 1905. Early man. In W. Page (ed.), The Victoria History of the County of Durham. Volume 1, 199–209. London: Archibald Constable Google Scholar
Guilbert, G. 1996. The oldest artefact of lead in the Peak: New evidence from Mam Tor. Mining History 13, 12–18 Google Scholar
Hansen, S. 1991. Studien zu den Metalldeponierungen während der Urnenfelderzeit im Rhein-Main-Gebiet. Bonn: Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 5 Google Scholar
Heeb, J. & Ottaway, B. 2014. Experimental archaeometallurgy. In B. Roberts & C. Thornton (eds), Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective, 161–192. New York: Springer Google Scholar
Helms, M. 2012. Nourishing a structured world with living metal in Bronze Age Europe. World Art 2, 105–118 Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, H. 1960. The Bronze Age moulds of the British Isles. Part 2: England and Wales – moulds of stone and bronze. Sibrium 5, 153–162 Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How things tell the stories of people’s lives. London: Routledge Google Scholar
Howard, H. 1983. The Bronze Casting Industry in Later Prehistoric Southern Britain: A study based on refractory debris. PhD thesis, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Jantzen, D. 2008. Quellen zur Metallverarbeitung im Nordischen Kreis der Bronzezeit. Stuttgart: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 19.2 Google Scholar
Jochum Zimmermann, E., Künzler Wagner, N. & Kunnert, U. 2003. Zurück zur Gussform. Zum Einfluss des Gussformmaterials auf die Mikrostruktur eines gegossenen Bronzeobjektes. Experimentelle Archäologie in Europa, Bilanz 2002, 79–91 Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2012. Prehistoric Materialities: Becoming material in prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Joy, J. 2009. Reinvigorating object biography: Reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology 41, 540–556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienlin, T. & Ottaway, B. 1998. Flanged axes of the North-Alpine region: An assessment of the possibilities of use-wear analysis on metal artefacts. In C. Mordant, M. Pernot & V. Rychner (eds), L’Atelier du bronzier en Europe du XXe au VIIIe siècle avant notre ère, 271–286. Paris: CTHS Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: Commoditisation as process. In A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. 2008. Bronze Age Metalworking in the Netherlands (c. 2000-800 BC). Leiden: Sidestone Press Google Scholar
Leahy, K. 1977. A Survey of Casting Moulds from the Middle and Late Bronze Age in Great Britain and Ireland. BA thesis, University of LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Malim, T. 2010. The environmental and social context of the Isleham hoard. Antiquaries Journal 90, 73–130 Google Scholar
Martinón-Torres, M. & Uribe-Villegas, M. 2015. Technology and culture in the invention of lost-wax casting in South America: An archaeometric and ethnoarchaeological perspective. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25, 377–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohen, J.-P. 1978. Moules en bronze de l’Age du Bronze. Antiquités Nationales 10, 23–32 Google Scholar
Moyler, S. 2007. Life on the Cutting Edge: Interpreting patterns of wear on Scottish early Bronze Age axes. PhD thesis, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Needham, S. 1981. The Bulford-Helsbury Manufacturing Tradition: The production of Stogursey socketed axes during the later Bronze Age in southern Britain. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 13 Google Scholar
Needham, S. 1990. The Petters Lane Late Bronze Age Metalwork. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 70 Google Scholar
Needham, S. 1993. The Beeston Castle Bronze Age metalwork and its significance. In P. Ellis (ed.), Beeston Castle, Cheshire: A report on the excavations 1968-85, 41–50. London: English Heritage Google Scholar
Needham, S. & Bridgford, S. 2013. Deposits of clay refractories for casting bronze swords. In N. Brown & M. Medlycott (eds), The Neolithic and Bronze Age Enclosures at Springfield Lyons, Essex: Excavations 1981–1991, 47–74. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology 149 Google Scholar
Needham, S. & Hook, D. 1988. Lead and lead alloys in the Bronze Age – recent finds from Runnymede Bridge. In E. Slater & J. Tate (eds), Science and Archaeology, Glasgow 1987: Proceedings of a conference on the application of scientific techniques to archaeology, Glasgow, September 1987, 259–74. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 196Google Scholar
O’Connor, B. 2007. Llyn Fawr metalwork in Britain: A review. In C. Haselgrove & R. Pope (eds), The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent, 64–79. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Ó Faoláin, S. 2004. Bronze Artefact Production in Late Bronze Age Ireland: A survey. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 382 Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. & Seibel, S. 1998. Dust in the wind: Experimental casting of bronze in sand moulds. In M.-C. Frère-Sautot (ed.), Paléométallurgie des cuivres. Actes du colloque de Bourg-en-Bresse et Beaune, 17-18 oct. 1997, 59–63. Montagnac: Monographies Instrumentum 5 Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. & Wang, Q. 2004. Casting Experiments and Microstructure of Archaeologically Relevant Bronzes. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S1331 Google Scholar
Pearce, I. 2006. The Bronze Age hoard. In I. Pearce (ed.), Roseberry Topping: Geology, landscape, history, heritage, 47–53. Great Ayton: Great Ayton Community Archaeology Project Google Scholar
Rainbird, P. 1999. Entangled biographies: Western Pacific ceramics and the tombs of Pohnpei. World Archaeology 31, 214–224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. & Ottaway, B. 2003. The use and significance of socketed axes during the late Bronze Age. European Journal of Archaeology 6, 119–140 Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. & Burgess, C. 1981. The Axes of Scotland and Northern England. Munich: Prähistorische Bronzefunde 9.7 Google Scholar
Staniaszek, B. & Northover, J. 1983. The properties of leaded bronze alloys. In A. Aspinall & S. Warren (eds), The Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Archaeometry Held at the University of Bradford, Bradford, UK, 30th March-3rd April 1982, 262–72. Bradford: University of BradfordGoogle Scholar
Stansby, A. 1984. The Production and Finishing of Wrought Bronze Tools and Other Objects. Part II thesis, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
Turner, L. 2010. A Re-interpretation of the Later Bronze Age Metalwork Hoards of Essex and Kent. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 507 Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. 1986. The Prehistory of Metallurgy in the British Isles. London: Institute of Metals Google Scholar
Vallancey, C. 1786. Collectanea de Rebus Hibernicis. Volume 4. Dublin: Luke White Google Scholar
Voce, E. 1951. Bronze castings in ancient moulds. In H. Coghlan (ed.), Notes on the Prehistoric Metallurgy of Copper and Bronze in the Old World, 112–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Wirth, M. 2003. Rekonstruktion bronzezeitlicher Gießereitechniken mittels numerischer Simulation, gießtechnologischer Experimente und werkstofftechnischer Untersuchungen an Nachguss und Original. Aachen: Shaker Google Scholar
Yates, D. & Bradley, R. 2010. The siting of metalwork hoards in the Bronze Age of south-east England. Antiquaries Journal 90, 41–72 Google Scholar
York, J. 2002. The life cycle of Bronze Age metalwork from the Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 21, 77–92 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Download undefined(File)
File 18.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Webley Supplementary Material

Webley Supplementary Material

Download Webley Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 54.1 KB