Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:21:36.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Garboldisham Macehead: its Manufacture, Date, Archaeological Context and Significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

Andrew Meirion Jones ,
Marta Díaz-Guardamino ,
Alex Gibson  and
Sylvia Cox
Andrew Meirion Jones
Affiliation:
Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BF Email: [email protected]
Marta Díaz-Guardamino
Affiliation:
School of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, John Percival Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU
Alex Gibson
Affiliation:
School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP
Sylvia Cox
Affiliation:
Henry Moore Studios & Gardens, Dane Tree House, Perry Green SG10 6EE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper discusses the Garboldisham macehead: an unusual decorated macehead carved from red deer antler. The macehead was found in the 1960s deposited in a tributary of the river Little Ouse, Norfolk and is decorated with three spirals, making it especially significant. This paper reports on the analysis of the decoration using digital imaging, discusses a new radiocarbon date recently obtained for the artefact, and discusses its significance alongside other dated antler maceheads.

Résumé

[10P]La tête de massue de Garboldisham: sa fabrication, sa datation, son contexte et sa signification archéologiques, de Andrew Meirion Jones, Marta Díaz-Guardamino, Alex Gibson, et Sylvia Cox

Cet article traite de la tête massue de Garboldisham: une massue décorée inhabituelle sculptée dans un bois de cerf. La tête de massue fut découverte dans les années 1960 reposant dans un affluent de la rivière Little Ouse, Norfolk, elle est décorée de trois spirales, ce qui la rend particulièrement significative.Cet article rend compte de l’analyse de la décoration au moyen de l’imagerie numérique, examine une nouvelle datation au C14 de l’artefact obtenue récemment et discute de sa portée à côté d’autres têtes de massue en bois de cerf datées.

Zussamenfassung

Der Keulenkopf von Garboldisham: Herstellung, Datierung, archäologischer Kontext und Bedeutung, von Andrew Meirion Jones, Marta Díaz-Guardamino, Alex Gibson, und Sylvia Cox

Dieser Beitrag erörtert den Keulenkopf von Garboldisham: eine ungewöhnliche verzierte Keule, die aus Rothirschgeweih hergestellt wurde. Der Keulenkopf wurde in den 1960er Jahren in einem Zufluss des Flusses Little Ouse, Norfolk, gefunden und ist mit drei Spiralen verziert, was ihn besonders bedeutsam macht. Dieser Beitrag stellt die Untersuchung der Verzierung mit Hilfe von digitalen Bildanalyseverfahren vor, diskutiert ein neues Radiokarbondatum, das jüngst am Artefakt gewonnen wurde, sowie dessen Bedeutung in Zusammenhang mit weiteren datierten Keulenköpfen aus Geweih.

Resumen

La maza de Garboldisham: manufactura, cronología, contexto arqueológico y significado, por Andrew Meirion Jones, Marta Díaz-Guardamino, Alex Gibson, y Sylvia Cox

Este artículo estudia la maza de Garboldisham: una inusual maza decorada con grabados elaborada en asta de ciervo. La maza fue documentada en los años 1960 como un depósito realizado en un afluente del río Little Ouse, Norfolk y está decorada con tres espirales, convirtiéndola en un objeto especialmente destacado. Este artículo se centra en el análisis de su decoración mediante el escaneo digital, y discute la nueva datación radiocarbónica recientemente obtenida a partir del artefacto y su significado junto a otras mazas realizadas en asta.

Keywords

Digital imagingdecorationmaceheadMiddle Neolithicspiralradiocarbon dating
Type
Shorter Contribution
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 83 , December 2017 , pp. 383 - 394
Copyright
© The Prehistoric Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ard, V. & Darvill, T. 2015. Revisiting old friends: the production, distribution and use of Peterborough Ware in Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 34(1), 1–31 Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. & O’Sullivan, M. 2013. Interpreting chronologies for the Mound of the Hostages, Tara and its contemporary context in Neolithic and Bronze Age Ireland. In O’Sullivan, M., Scarre, C. & Doyle, M. (eds), Tara from the Past to the Future, 26–104. Dublin: Wordwell Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1990. The Passage of Arms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Brewster, T.C.M. 1984. The Excavation of Whitegrounds Barrow, Burythorpe. Malton: East Riding of Yorkshire Archaeological Research Committee Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1), 337–360 Google Scholar
Clarke, D.V., Cowie, T.G. & Foxon, A. 1985. Symbols of Power at the Time of Stonehenge. Edinburgh: HMSO Google Scholar
Edwardson, A.R. 1965. A spirally decorated object from Garboldisham. Antiquity 39, 145 Google Scholar
Eogan, G. 1986. Knowth and the Passage Tombs of Ireland. London: Thames & Hudson Google Scholar
Eogan, G. & Richardson, H. 1982. Two maceheads from Knowth, Co. Meath. Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 112, 123–138 Google Scholar
Frodsham, P. 1996. Spirals in time: Morwick Mill and the spiral motif in the British Neolithic. In Frodsham, P (ed.), Neolithic Studies in No-Man’s Land. Papers on the Neolithic of Northern England from the Trent to the Tweed, 101–138. Northern Archaeology 13/14Google Scholar
Garrow, D., Griffiths, S., Anderson-Whymark, H. & Sturt, F. 2017. Stepping Stones to the Neolithic? Radiocarbon Dating the Early Neolithic on Islands Within the ‘Western Seaways’ of Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 83, 97–136Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 2002. Prehistoric Pottery in Britain and Ireland. Stroud: Tempus Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 2013. Two Middle Neolithic radiocarbon dates from the East Midlands. PAST 73, 1 Google Scholar
Gibson, A. & Bayliss, A. 2010. Recent work on the Neolithic round barrows of the upper Great Wold Valley, Yorkshire. In Leary, J., Darvill, T. & Field, D. (eds), Round Mounds and Monumentality in the British Neolithic and Beyond, 72–107. Oxford: Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 10 Google Scholar
Healy, F. 2011. Chronology, corpses, copper and lithics. In M.J. Allen, J. Gardiner, A. Sheridan & D. McOmish (eds), Is There a British Chalcolithic: people, place and polity in the later 3rd millennium, 144–163. Oxford: Prehistoric Society Research Paper 4 Google Scholar
Hensey, R. 2015. First Light. The Origins of Newgrange. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Jones, A.M., Cochrane, A., Carter, C., Dawson, I., Díaz-Guardamino, M., Kotoula, E. & Minkin, L. 2015. Digital imaging and prehistoric imagery: a new analysis of the Folkton Drums. Antiquity 89(347), 1083–1095 Google Scholar
Kinnes, I.A. 1995. An innovation backed by great prestige: the instance of the spiral and twenty centuries of stony sleep. In Kinnes, I.A. & Varndell, G. (eds), ‘Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape’: essays on British and Irish pottery for Ian Longworth, 49–53. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Lamdin-Whymark, H. 2008. The Residue of Ritual Action: Neolithic deposition practices in the Middle Thames Valley. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 466Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 2004. Spiraling outwards – the problems and possibilities of a later Neolithic Leitmotiv . In Gibson, A. & Sheridan, A. (eds), From Sickles to Circles: Britain and Ireland at the time of Stonehenge, 123–141. Stroud: Tempus Google Scholar
Loveday, R. & Barclay, A. 2010. ‘One of the most interesting barrows ever examined’ – Liffs Low revisited. In Leary, J., Darvill, T. & Field, D. (eds), Round Mounds and Monumentality in the British Neolithic, 108–129. Oxford: Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 10 Google Scholar
Loveday, R., Gibson, A., Marshall, P.D., Bayliss, A., Bronk Ramsay, C. & Plicht, H. van der. 2007. The Antler Maceheads Dating Project. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 73, 381–392 Google Scholar
MacSween, A., Hunter, J., Sheridan, A., Bond, J., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, P., Bayliss, A., Griffiths, S. & Whittle, A. 2015. Refining the chronology of the Neolithic settlement at Pool, Sanday, Orkney: implications for the emergence and development of Grooved Ware. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 81, 283–310.Google Scholar
Marshall, D.N. 1977. Carved stone balls. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 108, 40–72 Google Scholar
Mortimer, J.R. 1905. Forty Years’ Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds of East Yorkshire. London, Hull & York: A Brown & Sons Google Scholar
O’Kelly, M. 1982. Newgrange. Archaeology, Art and Legend. London: Thames & Hudson Google Scholar
Owles, E. & Smedley, N. 1967. Archaeology in Suffolk, 1967. Ipswich: Suffolk Institute of Archaeology Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1954. The Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M. & Plicht, J. van der. 2013. IntCal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 Years cal bp. Radiocarbon 55(4), 1869–1887 Google Scholar
Richards, C., Jones, A.M., MacSween, A., Sheridan, A., Dubar, E., Reimer, P., Bayliss, A., Griffiths, S. & Whittle, A. 2016. Settlement duration and materiality: formal chronological models for the development of Barnhouse, a Grooved Ware settlement in Orkney. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 82, 193–225.Google Scholar
Roe, F.E.S. 1968. Stone maceheads and the latest Neolithic cultures of the British Isles. In Coles, J.M. & Simpson, D.D.A. (eds), Studies in Ancient Europe, 145–172. Leicester: Leicester University Press Google Scholar
Shee Twohig, E. 2012. Inside and outside: visual culture at Loughcrew, Co. Meath. In Cochrane, A. & Jones, A.M. (eds), Visualising the Neolithic, 125–139. Oxford: Windgather Press Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. 2004. Going round in circles? Understanding the Irish Grooved Ware ‘complex’ in its wider context. In Coles, J., Grogan, E., Raftery, B., Roche, H. & Bradley, J. (eds), From Megaliths to Metals. Essays in Honour of George Eogan, 27–37. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., Garrow, D., Mason, O., Schulting, R., Snoeck, C., Bradley, R., Waddington, C., Cook, G. & Naysmith, P. 2014. Radiocarbon Dates associated with the Scottish History And Archaeology Department, National Museums Scotland, 2013/14. Discovery & Excavation in Scotland 2014, 200–204 Google Scholar
Sheridan, J.A., Goldberg, M., Blackwell, A., Mahler, D., Richards, M., Duffy, P., Gibson, A.M., Macniven, A. & Caldwell, D.H. 2012. Radiocarbon dates associated with the Scottish History and Archaeology Department, National Museums Scotland, 2011/12. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland 2013, 200–202 Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A 1996. ‘Crown’ antler maceheads and the Later Neolithic in Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 62, 293–309Google Scholar
Simpson, D.D.A., Murphy, E.M. & Gregory, R.A. 2006. Excavations at Northton, Isle of Harris. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 408Google Scholar